First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, taking into account the property's condition and the scarcity of similar accommodation in the area. The rent was set at £5,040.00 per quarter.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination that reflects the current market conditions and the state of the property, adjusted for any scarcity in the local rental market.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property, considering various factors including the condition of the property and local scarcity of similar accommodation.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £5,040.00 per quarter for a property, considering the property's condition, including the lack of central heating and unmodernised kitchen and bathroom, and the scarcity of similar accommodation in the local rental market.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AG/F77/2019/0136
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
[NAME] and [APPELLANT]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is 5040.00 Per Quarter (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 20 September 2019
3. The amount for services is 199.61 Per Quarter
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
N/A Per
5. The rent is to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
None
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £5113.61 per Quarter including £199.61 per Quarter for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 20th September 2019
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 289.5
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 272.3
X 289.5 Minus Y 272.3 = (A) 17.2
(A) 17.2 Divided by Y 272.3 = (B) 0.063166
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 - NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.113166
Last registered rent* 4414.10 Multiplied by (C) = 4913.62 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = 4914.00
Variable service charge YES If YES add amount for services 199.61
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £5113.61 Per Quarter
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : KA/LON/00AG/F77/2019/0136 Property :
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Landlord : [COMPANY] Tenant : Ms [APPELLANT] of application :
Fair rent determination in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977
Tribunal members : Judge P [NAME] (Chairman) Mr K Ridgeway MRICS Date of decision : 20th September 2019 Date of Extended Reasons : 24th October 2019
REASONS FOR DECISION
2 Decision of the FTT
The First-tier Tribunal (“FTT”) determines the fair rent to be £5,040.00 per quarter (including £199.61 per quarter for services), with effect from 20th September 2019. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rents) Order 1999 (“the Order”) apply but the fair rent is not limited by the Order as the fair rent is less than the maximum fair rent prescribed by the Order. Background 1. According to information supplied by the Landlord, the tenancy commenced on 25th December 1966.
2. On 2nd July 2019, the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £5,210.00 per quarter effective from 1st August 2019. The Rent Officer applied capping to the rent, and the Rent Register stated that the uncapped rent - i.e. the rent that would otherwise have been registered if the rent had not been subject to capping – was £6,375.00 per quarter.
3. By a letter dated 11th July 2019 Mr [NAME], acting by virtue of a Power of Attorney, objected on the Tenant’s behalf to the fair rent registered by the Rent Officer. Both parties made written representations but neither party requested a hearing. Inspection 4. The FTT inspected the Property on 20th September 2019 and noted that the Property was as described by the Rent Officer in the Rent Register.
5. There were four bedrooms, but the fourth bedroom was extremely small. The kitchen was small and unmodernised, and the white goods belonged to the Tenant. The bathroom was also small and unmodernised. There was no central heating, but there was some low- level background heating and some portable electric heaters. The lounge was large and bright and had a more modern feel to it than the rest of the Property. The Law 6. When determining the fair rent the FTT, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, had regard to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the Property. To the extent that it was aware of any, it also disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant tenant’s improvements and (b) any disrepair or other defect attributable to the Tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy on the rental value of the Property.
3 7. Section 70(2) of the Rent Act 1977 states that the FTT must also
assume that the demand for similar rented properties in the locality
does not significantly exceed the supply of such properties for rent. In
other words, the effect of any such “scarcity” on rental values must not
be included when determining the fair rent for the subject property. 8. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc.
Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999]QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised: (i) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of the regulated tenancy) and (ii) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy rents are usually appropriate comparables (these rents will have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
9. Therefore, once the market rent for the Property has been determined
by the exercise in 6 above, that rent must be adjusted, where necessary,
for scarcity.
10. The other relevant provision is the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 (“the Order”). Where it applies, this provides for a limit on the amount that can be registered as the fair rent, often referred to as the “capped rent”, calculated in accordance with a formula laid down in the Order. Valuation 11. In reaching its determination the FTT took into account the documents which were supplied by the Rent Officer, the parties’ written representations and its own general knowledge.
12. The FTT first determined the rent which the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market in the condition considered usual for a modern letting (“the initial valuation”). The FTT noted that whilst the Property technically contained four bedrooms one of those bedrooms was extremely small. On the other hand, the Property viewed as a whole was very spacious. The FTT noted the comparable evidence from the Landlord, as well as having regard to its own general knowledge of market rent levels in the area obtained through regular valuations in the London area. Having done this, it came to the conclusion that a reasonable initial valuation would be £10,500.00 per quarter.
4 13. Adjustments then needed to be made to this initial valuation to take into account (a) any information available to the FTT as to the actual condition of the Property, (b) any improvements carried out by the Tenant (which do not form part of her repairing obligations) and (c) the terms of the tenancy to the extent that they affect value.
14. Applying these principles to the Property, the FTT considered that a 40% deduction was due to reflect (i) the lack of central heating, (ii) the small and unmodernised kitchen, (iii) the small and unmodernised bathroom, (iv) the lack of soft furnishings and (iv) the Tenant’s responsibilities in relation to the upkeep of the interior. This reduced the rental figure from £10,500.00 per quarter to £6,300.00 per quarter. No information has been supplied by the Tenant to indicate that any improvements have been carried out by her.
15. The FTT also considered the issue of scarcity. The FTT has no doubt that there is substantial scarcity of accommodation of this type in Greater London. In the absence of any evidence from the parties, the FTT applied its own general knowledge and had regard to the collective knowledge of its expert members in the London region. The FTT concluded that 20% is currently the appropriate deduction in Greater London. Applying the 20% deduction referred to above, this reduced the rent to £5,040.00 per quarter.
16. Whilst the capping provisions of the Order do apply in this case, the above figure of £5,040.00 per quarter is less than the maximum fair rent prescribed by the Order. Consequently, the fair rent is not limited by the Order.
17. Therefore, the new fair rent for the Property is the amount of £5,040.00 per quarter.
Name:
Judge P [NAME]:
24th October 2019
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £831 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent After Inspecting Property Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination Under the Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property with Agricultural Tie
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £850 for East Sussex Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Tenants
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy Using Specific Formula
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent was determined to be £5,040.00 per quarter, including services.
- The tribunal considered the property's age, location, and state of repair when determining the fair rent.
- The tribunal assumed that the demand for similar rented properties did not significantly exceed supply, to disregard scarcity's effect on rental values.
- A 40% deduction was applied to the initial valuation due to the property's condition, including lack of central heating and unmodernised kitchen and bathroom.
- A 20% deduction was applied for scarcity of accommodation in Greater London, based on the tribunal's general knowledge.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided on a fair rent of £5,040.00 per quarter for a property.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court considered the property's condition and the scarcity of similar accommodation in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the scarcity of similar accommodation.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and the local rental market when seeking a fair rent determination.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Documents provided by the Rent Officer and the parties' written representations were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
