First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £131.00 per week for a protected tenancy, taking into account the current market conditions and statutory regulations.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined according to the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property based on market conditions and statutory guidelines.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £131.00 per week for a protected tenancy, considering market conditions and statutory guidelines under the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HB/F77/2021/0006
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 2B [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord M [APPELLANT] (Bristol) [APPELLANT]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £131.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 15 February 2021
3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
n/a Per n/a
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £132.00 per Week.
[NAME] of decision 15 February 2021
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 295.4
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 208.0
X 295.4 Minus Y 208.0 = (A) 87.4
(A) 87.4 Divided by Y 208.0 = (B) 0.4202
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.4702
Last registered rent* £88.85 Multiplied by (C) = 130.62 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £131.00
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £131.00 Per Week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
1
Case reference : CHI/00HB/F77/2021/0006 Tenant : Mr [APPELLANT] (Tenant) Landlord : [APPELLANT] (Bristol) [APPELLANT] : 2B [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Date of Objection : Referred to First-tier Tribunal
by Valuation Office Agency on
22nd December 2020
Type of Application : Section 70 Rent Act 1977 (the Act)
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Decision : 15th February 2021
_______________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 15th February 2021 that the rent would be £131.00 per week with effect from the same date.
2. On the 13th June 2020 the landlord of the above property applied to the Rent Officer for registration of a fair rent of £600.00 per calendar month. The rent having been previously determined by the First tier Tribunal at £88.85 per week on 13th September 2007 and effective from that date.
3. On the 17th November 2020 the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £101.92. per week effective from the same date.
4. The Landlord, [RESPONDENT], in an email dated the 30th November 2020, objected to the rent determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (Residential Property).
5. The tenancy appears to be a statutory protected periodic tenancy. There is no written tenancy agreement. The tenancy (not being for a fixed periodic tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the landlord's statutory repairing obligations).
Factual Background and Submissions 6. Following the Directions dated 14th January 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises. A hearing not was requested by either party.
7. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience, the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
8. The property comprises a ground floor flat in a converted residential townhouse.
9. The accommodation is said to comprise: Hallway, kitchen/diner, bedroom and bathroom.
10. All mains services are assumed to be connected. Full central heating.
11. The property is assumed in tenantable decorative order.
12. The property is located within central Bristol ([ADDRESS]) with easy access to amenities and the university.
3
13. The Tribunal noted that the property was let unfurnished and does not include carpets curtains or white goods. The Rent Officer noted the kitchen and bathroom were un-modernised.
14. The Tenant made no submissions
15. The Landlord made no formal submissions other than to state that the rent of £88.85 per week (£385.00 pcm) had not been increased since 2007. The Bristol City Council Housing Allowance Guide states that a tenant of a studio/one bed flat is entitled to £692.02 per calendar month and this justifies the landlord's proposal for an increase to £600.00 pcm (£138.46). The correspondence indicates that works of improvement (new windows) were in progress.
The Law 16. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, had regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.
17. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92, the Court of Appeal emphasised:
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for ‘scarcity’ (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent -
to that of the regulated tenancy) and
(b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
18. The Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 restricts the amount by which the rent may be increased to a maximum 5.oo% plus RPI since the last registration.
19. The only exception to this restriction is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent.
Tribunal’s deliberations 20. The Tribunal considered the matter with the benefit of the submissions of the parties.
21. The Tribunal takes no account of works proposed by the Landlord or in progress at the time of determination but considers the property as it stands on the day of determination.
4
22. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and was unable to identify a certificate (EPC) for the property. The minimum standard for offering a property to let on the open market is Rating E although the Tribunal considers that a rating of this level would have an adverse effect on the rent achievable.
23. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in the wider area of Bristol. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar property in fair condition with central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities and an EPC Rating E or above would be £160.00 per week.
24. However, the subject property is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. It is therefore necessary to adjust that hypothetical rent of £160.00 per week to allow for the differences between the condition considered usual (including responsibility of tenants to maintain decorations as opposed to decorate) for such a letting and the condition of the actual property as stated in the papers (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to this tenant or any predecessor in title), and the improvements carried out by the Tenant.
25. If this property were to be let on the open market it would of course come on the market in its present condition and not in the condition normally seen in such market lettings. The Tribunal considers that to reflect these matters, a deduction should be made to the hypothetical rent.
26. The Tribunal considers that a deduction should also be made to reflect the lack of floor coverings, curtains, white goods and lack of modern kitchen and bathroom.
27. The Tribunal considers that to reflect these matters the following deductions should be made:
a) Decoration liability: £7.00 b) Un-modernised kitchen £6.00 c) Un-modernised bathroom: £6.00 c) White goods: £4.50 d) Floorings and curtains: £4.50
28. A total deduction of £28.00 per week to the hypothetical rent.
29. This leaves a fair rent of £132.00.00 per week.
Scarcity
5
30. The matters taken into account by the Tribunal when assessing scarcity were:- a) The Tribunal interpreted the ‘locality’ for scarcity purposes as being the area the wider area of Bristol (i.e. a sufficiently large area to eliminate the effect of any localised amenity which would, in itself, tend to increase or decrease in rent. b) Local Authority and Housing Association waiting lists. c) House prices which could be an indicator of increased availability of housing and a reduction in scarcity. d) Submissions of the parties. e) The members of the Tribunal have between them many years of experience of the residential letting market and that experience leads them to the view that there is no substantial shortage of similar houses available to let in the locality defined above.
31. Assessing a scarcity percentage cannot be a precise arithmetical calculation because there is no way of knowing either the exact number of people looking for a particular type of house in the private sector or the exact number of such properties available. It can only be a judgment based on the years of experience of members of the Tribunal. However, the Tribunal did not consider that there was a substantial scarcity element and accordingly made no further deduction for scarcity.
32. This leaves a fair rent for the subject property of £132.00 per week.
Relevant Law 33. The Rent Act 1977.
34. Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. In particular paragraph 7 which states:
This article does not apply in respect of a dwelling-house if because of a change in the condition of the dwelling-house or the common parts as a result of repairs or improvements (including the replacement of any fixture or fitting) carried out by the landlord or a superior landlord, the rent that is determined in response to an application for registration of a new rent under Part IV exceeds by at least 15% the previous rent registered or confirmed.
Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 35. The rent to be registered is limited by the Fair Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 because it is above the maximum fair rent (see calculation on reverse of decision sheet) of £131.00 per week and accordingly the sum of £131.00 per week will be registered as the fair rent on and with effect from 15th February 2021 being the date of the Tribunal's decision.
[NAME]
6
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for Tenancy Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Fair Rent Determination for a London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Using Retail Price Index
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Central London Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent was determined to be £131.00 per week, excluding water rates and council tax.
- The effective date for the new fair rent was set as 15 February 2021.
- The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 applied to the rent determination.
- The previous registered rent was increased by the percentage change in the retail price index.
- A 5% increase was added to the calculation because it was a second or subsequent application since 1 February 1999.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed rent of £600.00 per calendar month was not accepted as the fair rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided on a fair rent of £131.00 per week for a protected tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on market conditions and statutory guidelines to ensure the rent was fair and reasonable.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the need to determine a fair rent based on current market conditions and statutory guidelines.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect their fair rent to be determined similarly, considering market conditions and statutory guidelines.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included the condition of the property, market comparables, and statutory guidelines.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this to ensure proper representation and understanding of the legal process.
