First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Tenanted Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a rented property, setting it at £510.00 per month. They considered the property's condition, necessary improvements, and local market rents to reach their decision.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the condition and location of the property, adjusted for necessary improvements and landlord's neglect.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property taking into account various factors including the condition of the property and the market rent in the area.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £510.00 per calendar month for a property, taking into account its condition, necessary improvements, and market rent in the area. The decision was made on 10 April 2019 by Mr Colin Green and Mr Ken Kasambara.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00BY/F77/2019/0018
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 53 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord [COMPANY]
Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £ 510.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 10 April 2019
3. The amount for services is 0.00 Per
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
0.00 Per
not applicable
5. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
6. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
7. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the below the maximum fair rent of £557.50 per Calendar Month prescribed by the Order.
[ADDRESS] of decision 10 April 2019
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 285
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 269.30
X 285 Minus Y 269.30 = (A) 15.70
(A) 15.70 Divided by Y 269.30 = (B) 0.0583
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.1083
Last registered rent* 503 Multiplied by (C) = 557.47 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = 557.50
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £ 557.50 Per calendar month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/00BY/F77/2019/0018
Property : 53 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Landlord : [COMPANY]
Tenant : [APPELLANT] of Application : Determination of a fair rent under Section 70 of the Rent Act 1977
Tribunal Members : [ADDRESS] (chairman) and [NAME] and venue of hearing
: Determination on the papers following an external inspection of the Property on 10 April 2019
Date of Decision : 10 April 2019
REASONS FOR DECISION
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019
2
DECISION A fair rent of £510.00 per calendar month was determined by the Tribunal on 10 April 2019 with effect from the same date
REASONS Preliminary 1. On 7 December 2018, an application for registration of a fair rent for [ADDRESS] (“the Property”) was received by the Rent Officer from [COMPANY] (“the Agent”) on behalf of [NAME] ([RESPONDENT] (“the Landlord”). The Property is tenanted by [APPELLANT] (“the Tenant”). There is no service charge.
2. A rent of £518.00 per calendar month was determined by the Rent Officer on 21 January 2019 with effect from 6 March 2019.
3. On 18 February 2019, the Agent objected to the registered fair rent and requested the Rent Officer to refer the matter to the Tribunal. Inspection 4. The Tribunal inspected the Property externally on 10 April 2019, the Tenant having requested that there be no internal inspection. The Property is a semi-detached house comprising two ground floor living rooms and a kitchen and three bedrooms and a bathroom on the first floor, with gardens front and rear. As appears from the Agent’s written submissions, there is no central heating. The letting is unfurnished.
5. The Tribunal noted no items of landlord’s disrepair or tenant’s improvements, but the installation of central heating throughout the Property is a necessary improvement
3
Evidence 6. The Tribunal received written representations from the Agent which provided details as to the location of the Property, that they considered the Landlord to be responsible but recognised that the Property was not to modern day standards. Also included were details of three other properties, all three-bedroom semi-detached houses in Childwall, available for letting together with the asking rents: at [ADDRESS], at £895.00 pcm, [ADDRESS] at £850.00 pcm, and [ADDRESS] at £795.00 pcm. No written representations were received from the Tenant. Neither party requested a hearing when oral representations could have been made. The Tribunal therefore re-convened following the inspection to consider its decision. Law 7. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, Section 70: 7.1. Has regard to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the property; 7.2. Disregards the effect on the rental value of the property of (a) any relevant tenant improvements and (b) any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy; 7.3. Assumes (as required by s70(2) that, whatever might be the case, the demand for similar rented properties in the locality does not significantly exceed the supply of such properties for rent. In other words that the effect of such 'scarcity' on rental values is not reflected in the fair rent of the subject property.
4
8. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised that section 70 means: 8.1. that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the subject property discounted for “scarcity”, and 8.2. that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between these comparables and the subject property)
9. Thus, once the market rent for the Property has been determined by the exercise above, that rent must be adjusted, where necessary, for any scarcity.
10. The Tribunal must consider the application of the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 by calculating the maximum fair rent applicable to the Property in accordance with the formula contained in the Order. Valuation and Fair Rent
11. The Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let now in the condition that is considered fit and usual for such an open market letting.
12. The Tribunal carefully reviewed the comparables provided but it was considered that the Property fell below the standard of such properties. The Tribunal also had regard to the presence of central heating and the
5
fact that these were asking rather than actual rents. The Tribunal considered that in the light of the evidence and its general knowledge of rents in the locality the market rent for the Property in the condition referred to in paragraph 11 above would be £650.00 per calendar month including white goods and some furnishings.
13. Having regard to the condition of the property and relying on its own and general experience in the region the Tribunal concluded that it was appropriate to make some adjustments.
14.
Accordingly, the assessment of the fair rent is as follows: Market rent in good condition 650.00 per calendar month White goods and furnishings (65.00) Landlord’s neglect (0.00) Necessary improvements (75.00) Tenant’s improvements (0.00)
(140.00) Occupational rent per calendar month 510.00 15. The Tribunal does not consider that in the present-day market, there is any substantial scarcity element and accordingly no further deduction is made for scarcity 16. The rent is however, subject to the capping provisions of the 1999 order. After effecting the appropriate calculation, the Tribunal determined that
6
the fair rent assessed above was below the maximum fair rent for the Property, which was calculated to be £557.50 per calendar month. Signed: [ADDRESS]: 02 May 2019
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Caps Fair Rent at £190 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Fair Rent of £150 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Maximum Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.
- The fair rent should reflect the condition and location of the property.
- Necessary improvements and the landlord's neglect are considered in determining the fair rent.
- The fair rent is capped according to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
- Market conditions and the state of repair of the property influence the fair rent determination.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified as leading to a decision against the claimant in the provided cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a fair rent of £510.00 per calendar month for a rented property.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the condition of the property, necessary improvements, and local market rents.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the need for improvements.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and local market rents when seeking a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparative rental data and the condition of the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to seek legal advice from a solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
