First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent of £165 Per Week
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £165 per week for a property in Cornwall. They considered the property's condition, location, and the fact that the tenant provided some amenities like carpets and curtains.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the market conditions and the state of the property, adjusted for any tenant-provided amenities and disrepair.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £165 per week for a property, effective from November 3, 2023, after considering various factors including the property's condition and location.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £165 per week for a property located in Merrymeet, Cornwall, effective from November 3, 2023. The decision took into account the property's condition, location, and the absence of certain amenities provided by the tenant.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HE/F77/2023/0055
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 2 Penhawger Cottages, Merrymeet, Liskeard, Cornwall, [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord Mrs [APPELLANT]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is £165.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 03 November 2023
3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
n/a Per n/a
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £195.50 per Week prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 3 November 2023
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 378.4
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 308.6
X 378.4 Minus Y 308.6 = (A) 69.8
(A) 69.8 Divided by Y 308.6 = (B) 0.2262
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.2762
Last registered rent* £153.08 Multiplied by (C) = 195.36 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £195.50
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £195.50 Per Week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HE/F77/2023/0055 Property : 2 Penhawger Cottages Merrymeet Liskeard Cornwall [POSTCODE]
Applicant Landlord : Mrs [COUNSEL] : None Respondent Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :
Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] of Inspection : None. Determined on the papers
Date of Decision
:
3rd November 2023
DECISION
CHI/00HE/F77/2023/0055
2 Summary of Decision
On 3rd November 2023 the Tribunal determined a fair rent of £165 per week with effect from 3rd November 2023.
Background
1. On 3rd July 2023 the Landlord applied to the Rent Officer for registration of a fair rent of £175.25 per week for the property, equating to £759.42 per month.
2. The rent was previously registered on the 24th September 2021 at £153.08 per week following a determination by the Rent Officer. This equated to £716.65 per month.
3. The rent was registered by the Rent Officer on the 4th August 2023 at a figure of £165.38 per week with effect from the 27th September 2023. This equates to £759.42.
4. On 4th August 2023 the Landlord objected to the rent determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to the First Tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property) formerly a Rent Assessment Committee.
5. The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.
6. The Tribunal office issued directions on 26th September 2023 which informed the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent on the basis of written representations subject to the parties requesting an oral hearing. No request was made by the parties for a hearing.
7. Both parties were invited to include photographs and video within their representations if they so wished and were informed that the Tribunal might also consider information about the property available on the internet.
8. Representations were made by the Landlord which were copied to the Tenant, but no representation was made by the Tenant.
The Property 9. From the information provided and available on the internet, the property can be described as a semi-detached house built in 1864 as evidenced by a builder’s stone on the property. It is in a rural situation some 3 miles northeast of Liskeard with no immediate shopping facilities. The nearest bus link is ½ mile distant.
CHI/00HE/F77/2023/0055
3
10. The elevations have been rendered and the roof is pitched. Windows are double glazed. The only heating is from a multifuel burner in the Living room, recently installed at the Landlord’s expense.
11. The accommodation includes 3 Bedrooms, Living Room, Kitchen, Utility and Bathroom. Outside there are large gardens, 2 sheds and off-road parking.
Evidence and Representations
12. The Tenancy commenced 1st November 1985.
13. The Rent Officer had assessed an open market rent of £190.38 per week, which equates to £825 per month, and then makes several deductions including an allowance for internal decoration, arriving at an adjusted figure of £165.38 per week which equates to £716.65 per month.
14. The Landlord states that she has carried out continuous improvements and repairs to the property, that the Bathroom is in good repair and the Kitchen “is basic but solid”, both having been installed when the tenancy began in 1985.
15. The Landlord states that the Tenant supplies all white goods, carpets and curtains.
The Law
16. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, had regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.
17. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and
(b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These
CHI/00HE/F77/2023/0055
4 rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
18. The Tribunal also has to have regard to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 where applicable. Most objections and determinations of registered rents are now subject to the Order, which limits the amount of rent that can be charged by linking increases to the Retail Price Index. It is the duty of the Property Tribunal to arrive at a fair rent under section 70 of the Act but in addition to calculate the maximum fair rent which can be registered according to the rules of the Order. If that maximum rent is below the fair rent calculated as above, then that (maximum) sum must be registered as the fair rent for the subject property.
Valuation
19. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only, with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
20. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the good condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal's own general knowledge of market rent levels in the area of Liskeard and east Cornwall. Having done so it concluded that such a likely market rent would be £925 per calendar month.
21. It should be noted that market rents are normally based on a monthly figure.
22. However, the property was not let in a condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore, it was first necessary to adjust that hypothetical rent of £925 per calendar month particularly to reflect the fact that the carpets, curtains and white goods were all provided by the Tenant which would not be the case for an open market assured shorthold tenancy. The lack of central heating, dated Kitchen and the Tenant’s liability for internal decoration also needed to be taken into account
23. The Tribunal therefore considered that this required a total deduction of £210 per month made up as follows:
Tenant’s provision of floorings £50 Tenant’s provision of white goods £30 Tenant’s provision of curtains £20 Tenant’s liability for internal decoration £50 Dated kitchen £20 Lack of full central heating £40
____
CHI/00HE/F77/2023/0055
5 TOTAL per month £210
24. The Tribunal did not consider that there was any substantial scarcity element in the area of Liskeard and east Cornwall.
Decision
25. Having made the adjustments indicated above the fair rent determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was accordingly £715 per calendar month which equates to £165 per week.
26. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Tribunal is below the maximum fair rent of £195.50 per week permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice and accordingly that rent limit has no effect.
Accordingly the sum of £165 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from the 3rd November 2023 being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £552.50 Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Brighton Property at £231 Weekly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £241.50 Per Week
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £490 Per Month Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £124.00 Per Week
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.
- A tenant is entitled to a fair rent set by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977.
- A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjusted for the condition of the property and service charges, subject to the maximum fair rent cap under the Rent Acts (Ma
- A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's market value, adjusted for certain factors.
- A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined by the Tribunal based on the property's condition and market rents, subject to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent)
- A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed according to the Rent Act 1977.
- A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determined according to the Rent Act 1977, taking into account the property's condition and market comparables.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The maximum fair rent for a property is determined by the percentage change in the retail price index since the last registration, plus a fixed percentage increase.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The fair rent for a property was set at £165 per week.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the tenant were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition, location, and the amenities provided by the tenant.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition and location of the property, along with the amenities provided by the tenant.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord, setting a higher rent than initially proposed by the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the property's condition, location, and any amenities provided by the tenant when determining a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and video representations of the property were considered, along with the internet information about the property.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
