VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Interest Value Under Leasehold Reform Act

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal determined the value of a freehold interest in a property under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. The Tribunal considered valuation reports and determined the price of the freehold interest and the outstanding rent due.

⚖️ Legal holding

Under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, a tenant is entitled to acquire the freehold interest in their property if they meet the statutory requirements.

Topics

valuation of freehold interestunpaid ground rent

Provisions

Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s.9

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the price for the freehold interest and outstanding rent under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the value of the freehold interest in a property under Section 9 of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. The valuation included the price of the freehold interest and the outstanding rent due. The decision was based on the valuation reports and the statutory requirements.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/00BY/OAF/2023/0018

Property : 2 LYON ROAD, LIVERPOOL [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : VALUATION OF FREEHOLD INTEREST Section 9, LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967

Tribunal Members : JUDGE A M Davies TRIBUNAL MEMBER [NAME] of Decision : 13 February 2024

DECISION

The value of the Respondent’s freehold interest in [ADDRESS], Liverpool is £210. The unpaid ground rent payable by the Applicant is £390.

The total sum payable by the Applicant for the freehold interest is therefore £600.

REASONS

1. On 21 June 2023 the Applicant applied to the County Court at Liverpool under Section 27(1) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (“the Act”) for an order that [ADDRESS], Liverpool (“the Property”) be vested in her.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

2. On 18 September 2023 District Judge Lampkin, being satisfied (a) that the Applicant is entitled to acquire the freehold of the Property pursuant to Part 1 of the Act and (b) that sufficient attempts had been made to trace the landlord but without success, ordered that the freehold of the Property shall be vested in the Applicant subject to her paying into court the price payable in accordance with section 9 of the Act together with any unpaid rent due up to the date of the conveyance.

3. The District Judge transferred the Applicant’s claim to this tribunal for a determination of the price payable for the freehold title and the outstanding rent.

4. The Tribunal has not inspected the premises, but has seen valuation reports prepared for the Applicant by [NAME] dated 5 September 2022 and 25 November 2023. These describe the Property as a two bedroomed end terrace house with one reception room. Comparing recent prices achieved for similar houses within one mile of the Property the agents valued it at approximately £89,000 in 2022 and £94,500 in 2023.

5. The Applicant’s lease is dated 1st March 1985 and creates a term of 999 years from the date of the lease. The rent payable is £10 payable on the first of January in each year, the first payment becoming due on 1st January 1986.

6. Along with other properties, on 21 July 1881 the Property was subjected to a perpetual yearly rentcharge of £27. The Land Registry title of the Property (title number MS231472) states at Note 2, paragraph 1 of the Charges Register: “The registered estate was informally exonerated from this rentcharge by the registered Lease”. The rentcharge has therefore not been taken into consideration on determination of the price payable for the freehold.

7. The valuation date adopted by the Tribunal is 21 June 2023 being the date the application was made to the court for a vesting order.

8. The valuation approach under s9(1) of the Act has three stages: (1) capitalise the annual rent until the expiry of the term of the lease, (2) calculate the modern ground rent and capitalise this for 50 years – then defer the capitalised sum to the date of valuation, and (3) defer the market value of the standing house for (1) plus

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

(2) (“the reversion”). In this case the unexpired term of the lease is 961 years and calculations (2) and (3) are not required, as in both cases the result is nil.

9. The Tribunal’s valuation is therefore: Ground rent £10 x [NAME] @ 4.75% = £210.00

£ Enfranchisement price (excluding costs)

210.00 Rent due from 1986 to 2024 inclusive @ £10 pa

390.00 Total amount due from the Applicant: [redacted]

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant meets the statutory requirements set by the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided on the value of the freehold interest and the outstanding rent due under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

Who was involved?

The case involved a tenant seeking to acquire the freehold interest in their property and the landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on valuation reports and the statutory requirements under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Leasehold Reform Act 1967, specifically Section 9, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the valuation of the freehold interest and the calculation of the outstanding rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, determining the value of the freehold interest and the outstanding rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they have accurate valuation reports and meet the statutory requirements under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Valuation reports prepared by sales and letting agents were crucial in determining the value of the freehold interest.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.