First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Reversion Value Under Leasehold Reform Act
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal determined the value of a property's freehold reversion to be £40.00, following an expert valuation report. The case involved a missing landlord scenario under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
⚖️ Legal holding
Under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, the appropriate sum for the freehold reversion of a property is determined based on the valuation report submitted.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal assessed the price for the freehold reversion of a property under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal assessed the appropriate sum for the freehold reversion of a property under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, determining the price to be £40.00 based on an expert valuation report.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
:
CHI/24UP/OAF/2020/0001
Property
:
18 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
:
[COUNSEL] LLP
Respondent: [redacted]
:
Type of Application
:
Leasehold Reform Act 1967 ([RESPONDENT] Landlord)
Tribunal Member
:
[NAME] of Decision
:
12 March 2020
DECISION
Summary of Decision
The Tribunal has determined for the reasons set out below that the price payable by the Applicant for the freehold reversion of the property is to be the sum of £40.00 and the amount of unpaid pecuniary rent payable for the property up to the date of the proposed conveyance is nil.
2 Background
1. District Judge Stewart sitting at the County Court at Winchester made an order dated 10 January 2020 directing that the First–tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) a. Assess the appropriate sum in accordance with S27 (5) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. (The Act) b. Approve the form of conveyance
2. By Directions dated 27 January 2020 the Tribunal stated that the application would be dealt with on the papers without a hearing unless an objection was received within 28 days. No objection has been received and the matter is therefore determined in accordance with Rule 31 of the Tribunal Procedural Rules.
3. The Directions also required the submission of an expert valuation report and draft of the proposed Transfer.
4. At tab 4 of the bundle is a valuation report dated 24 February 2020 from [NAME] who has valued the freehold interest at the nominal sum of £40.
5. An inspection of the property has not been made.
The Lease
6. The site is identified on the HM Land Registry plans edged red under leasehold title number HP530724. The Freehold Title is unregistered. The leasehold title is for a term of 1,000 years from 29 September 1883 and made between [NAME] and [NAME]. The lease is subject to a yearly rent of £2.50.
7. It appears that there is a superior lease in respect of this and other land between [NAME] and [NAME] details of which are unknown.
The Law
8. Section 27(5) of the Act provides: The appropriate sum which in accordance with Section 27(3) of the Act to be paid into Court is the aggregate of: a. Such amount as may be determined by (or on appeal from) the appropriate Tribunal to be the price payable in accordance with Section 9 above; and b. The amount or estimated amount (as so determined) of any pecuniary rent payable for the house and premises up to the date of the Conveyance which remains unpaid.
9. Section 9 of the Act sets out in detail the assumptions to be made and the procedure to be followed in carrying out the valuation. The effect of
3 Section 27(1) is that the valuation date is the date on which the application was made to the Court.
10. There are various bases set out in Section 9 of the Act and the Tribunal determines that the appropriate basis is in Subsection 9(1) being that on 31 March 1990 the Rateable value of the house and premises was not above £500.
The Premises
11. The property comprises a mid terrace house constructed at the turn of the last century.
12. The accommodation comprises an entrance hall, sitting room, dining room and kitchen on the ground floor, 2 bedrooms, bathroom and shower room on the first floor and a third bedroom on the second floor.
13. Outside there are small gardens front and rear.
Evidence and Decision
14. Mr [NAME] made his determination on an open market value of the property of £525,000 and a site value proportion of 30.00% (£157,500). However, in view of the length of time before reversion he assesses its value at nil.
15. [NAME] then values the income of £2.50 per annum at a 6% return arriving at £42 which he rounds down to £40.
16. Mr [NAME] bases his open market value on the sale of three similar sized properties sold between April 2017 and October 2019 at prices between £500,000 and £570,000.
17. The freeholder’s interest comprises a modest income of £2.50 per annum plus a reversion to vacant possession in little short of 900 years’ time.
18. In view of the above the Tribunal accepts Mr [NAME] valuation of £40.00
19. The Tribunal determines that the amount of unpaid pecuniary rent payable for the property up to the date of the proposed conveyance is nil.
20. The TR1 at Tab 8 of the bundle is approved.
D [NAME]
12 March 2020
4
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office, which has been dealing with the case. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
2. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
3. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Reversion Value Under Leasehold Ref…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Reversion Value Under Leasehold Ref…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Granted Right to Purchase Freehold Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Reversion Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Reversion Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Reversion Value Under Leasehold Ref…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Entitled to Purchase Freehold Reversion Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Reversion Value Under Leasehold Ref…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Leasehold Property Purchase Price at £60
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Valuation at £6.00
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Interest Price at £116.00
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Reversion Value Under Leasehold Ref…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The valuation report was compliant with the requirements set forth in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
- The appropriate sum for the freehold reversion was determined based on an open market valuation.
- The claimant was entitled to a fair assessment of the price payable for the freehold reversion of their property.
- Specific statutory provisions were considered in determining the appropriate sum for the freehold reversion.
- The valuation report included relevant legal considerations in determining the appropriate sum.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided that the price for the freehold reversion of the property is £40.00.
Who was involved?
The case involved the applicant seeking the freehold reversion and a missing landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court accepted the valuation report submitted by an expert, which determined the value of the freehold reversion.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Leasehold Reform Act 1967, specifically sections 27(5) and 9, were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the expert valuation report submitted by the applicant.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider obtaining a professional valuation report to support their application.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The expert valuation report was crucial in supporting the application.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person wishing to appeal this decision must seek permission from the First-tier Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
