VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting it at £1,175 per month starting from August 29, 2024. The decision was based on local rental prices and the a person's features.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for a similar property in the open market.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies certain repairing obligations in short leases. It requires the landlord to keep the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house, along with installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation, in good repair and proper working order.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,175 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from 29 August 2024, considering local rental levels and property characteristics.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. CAM/00MD/MDR/2024/0003

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 127 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

[NAME] 16 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1,175 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 29 August 2024

3. The amount included for services is

not applicable Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 29 May 2021

5. Length of the term or rental period 12 months

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Tenant liable for internal repairs. LL to comply with s11 LTA 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A

9. Description of premises The [NAME] comprises a first floor one bedroom purpose built maisonette of brick and tile construction that he been rearranged internally to provide a living room/kitchen with a bathroom, landing and two bedrooms. There is a residents parking space but no garage or garden area. The [NAME] has central heating, UPVC double glazing, carpets, curtains and White Goods supplied by the Landlord.

Chairman P [NAME] of Decision 2 May 2025

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME]) Case reference : CAM/00MD/MDR/2024/0003 HMCTS code : V:[NAME] : [ADDRESS], Colnbrook, Slough, SL3 ORB Applicant (Tenant) : [NAME] Respondent (Landlord) : T [APPELLANT] of [NAME] : Determination of a Market Rent: Sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Determination : 2 May 2025

DECISION

The Hearing was held by means of CVP video conferencing. The documents that the Tribunal was referred to are in bundles from the Applicant and the Respondent. The Tribunal has noted the contents and the decision is below.

2

Decision The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,175 per calendar month effective from 29 August 2024.

Reasons Background

1. On 16 July 2024, the Landlord served notice under section 13 (2) of the Housing Act 1988 to increase the passing rent from £1,050 per calendar month (pcm) to £1,200 per month with effect from 29 August 2024.

2. This rent is stated to be exclusive of Council Tax, Water Charges and fixed service charges.

3. The Tenant made an undated [NAME] to the Tribunal in reliance on section 13 (4) of the Housing Act 1988.

4. The Tribunal issued directions on 31 October 2024, inviting the Parties to submit any further representations (including any photographs and details of rentals for similar properties) they wished the Tribunal to consider.

The [NAME]

5. The Tribunal did not inspect the [NAME] but has relied upon the representations of the Parties together with information in the public domain including Google Earth Pro.

6. The [NAME] comprises a first floor one bedroom purpose built maisonette of brick and tile construction that he been rearranged internally to provide a living room/kitchen with a bathroom, landing and two bedrooms. There is a residents parking space but no garage or garden area.

7. The [NAME] has central heating, UPVC double glazing, carpets, curtains and White Goods supplied by the Landlord. The Tenancy 8. The Tenant occupied the [NAME] by virtue of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy that commenced 29 May 2021 for a term of 12 months.

9. The rent reserved under this Tenancy was £925 pcm.

10. The Tenant’s obligations are set out within the Tenancy at Section 2. The Tribunal has had regard to the provisions set out therein.

3 11. The Landlord’s obligations are set out in Section 3. In this regard, the Landlords’ obligations in respect of the maintenance of the [NAME] and appliances are set out in clauses 3.1, 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 respectively. The Tribunal notes clause 2.59 which provides that the Tenant shall permit the Landlord access to fulfil its obligations. The Law 12. Section 5 (3) of the Act provides that the periodic tenancy arising on expiry of the Assured Shorthold Tenancy is one: “(a) taking effect in possession immediately on the coming to an end of the fixed term tenancy; (b) deemed to have been granted by the person who was the landlord under the fixed term tenancy immediately before it came to an end to the person who was then the tenant under that tenancy; (c) under which the premises which are let are the same dwelling- house as was let under the fixed term tenancy; (d) under which the periods of the tenancy are the same as those for which rent was last payable under the fixed term tenancy; and (e) under which, subject to the following provisions of this Part of this Act, the other terms are the same as those of the fixed term tenancy immediately before it came to an end, except that any term which makes provision for determination by the landlord or the tenant shall not have effect while the tenancy remains an assured tenancy” 13. Section 14 (1) of the 1988 Act provides that the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the [NAME] might reasonably be expected to let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy: a. “having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; b. which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; c. the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of rent) are the same as those of the existing tenancy.” 14. Section 14 (2) of the 1988 Act requires the Tribunal to disregard: a. “Any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a [NAME]; b. Any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement (as defined by section 14 (3) of the Act) otherwise than as an obligation;

4 c. Any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.” 15. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the 1985 Act), provides that the Tribunal is to imply a covenant by the Landlord: a. “to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling- house (including drains, gutters and external pipes), b. to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the dwelling-house for the supply of water, gas and electricity and for sanitation (including basins, sinks, baths and sanitary conveniences, but not other fixtures, fittings and appliances for [NAME] use of the supply of water, gas or electricity), and c. to keep in repair and proper working order the installations in the dwelling-house for space heating and heating water.” 16. Section 14 (7) of the 1988 Act states: “Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.” Representations – The Tenant 17. The Tenant confirmed that the [NAME] had been let unfurnished and explained that the Landlord is: “…asking 1200 pound a month and this is way to (sic) much. Our next door neighbour Flat 131 is paying 1000 pound a month.” Representations – The Landlord 18. The Landlord completed the Reply Form and attached a [NAME] featuring various two bedroom flats at asking rents ranging from £1,150 per month to £1,250 per month.

19. The Landlord also submitted a covering email from Mr [RESPONDENT] (Lettings Manager at [NAME]) which stated: “In my professional opinion I feel the price of £1200 pcm is justified for the reasons as follow. In order to establish a price of a [NAME], [NAME] will use [NAME] + which provides us with other

5 properties on the market or previously rented within the area and close proximity. Please see enclosed. The best price guide is based on the postcode of [ADDRESS] plus a 0.5 mile radius going back to August 2022. The top two are the most comparable as these were within the same road. One showing a marketing price of £1250 pcm and the other £1350 pcm. Furthermore we are currently marketing one bedroom apartments for £1200 pcm - £1250 pcm, therefore the price of £1200 pcm is more than reasonable for a two bedroom apartment.” Determination 20. The Tribunal has had regard to all the correspondence and evidence provided by the Parties but is unable to refer to or make observations in respect of each point and document provided to it.

21. In determining the market rent, the Tribunal has regard to prevailing levels of rent in the general locality and achieved rental values in respect of other properties of comparable accommodation and provision that would be likely to be considered by a [NAME]. The current rent, and the period that has passed since that rent was agreed or determined is not relevant.

22. Previous changes in rent are not, therefore, relevant as the Tribunal is required to assess the rent that would be offered by a [NAME] who has no knowledge of the existing or previous rents. Similarly, historic rents achieved elsewhere are of limited relevance.

23. The legislation requires the Tribunal to have regard to market demand assuming that the landlord is willing. The Tribunal is unable to have any regard to the personal circumstances or identities of the actual landlord and tenant in assessing the level of rent.

24. It is therefore irrelevant whether or not the Landlord requires the rent to be at a certain level to fund its liabilities and/or its repair obligations under the lease or whether the Tenant feels that the services provided by the Landlord are “value for money.” As such, the cost of [NAME] maintenance to the Landlord does not affect the rent that would be offered by a [NAME] in the market and must be disregarded.

25. The Tribunal considers that there are two points that are particularly relevant in this matter. The first is that, whilst the [NAME] provides two bedrooms, these have been created by reversing the original layout and using the original lounge and kitchen as two separate bedrooms whist turning the original lounge into an open plan kitchen and living room. As such, the overall size of the flat remains unchanged. The second point is that the evidence provided to the Tribunal comprises asking rather than agreed rents.

26. The Tribunal has reviewed all the evidence provided and determines the market rental of the [NAME] to be £1,175 pcm. The rent payable

6 may not, therefore, exceed this figure. However, this does not prevent the Landlord from charging a lower figure. 27. This rent is effective from 29 August 2024. Name: [NAME] [NAME]: 2 May 2025

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME] Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the [NAME], and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's internal rearrangement to create two bedrooms from a one-bedroom layout was a relevant factor.
  • The Tribunal considered asking rents rather than agreed rents as part of the evidence.
  • The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,175 per calendar month for the property.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1,175 per month.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord in an assured periodic tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on local rental prices and the property's characteristics.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the market rent levels in the local area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider local rental prices when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included rental prices for similar properties in the area.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.