VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £855, which took effect on April 28, 2024, following the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a determination of rent under an assured periodic tenancy according to the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy, except if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. The tribunal will then decide the rent that a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £855 per month, effective from 28 April 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00FY/MNR/2024/0068

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: 855 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28 April 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 28 July 2021 5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly 6. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with lease agreement 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord All furniture and floor coverings 8. Description of premises A second floor one bedroomed flat in a purpose built development located in a central City location surrounded by mixed use properties.

[NAME] of Decision 12 July 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a determination of rent under an assured periodic tenancy according to the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant requested a rent assessment under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The court recognized the tenant's right to a fair rent determination.
  • The Housing Act 1988 was cited as the legal basis for the tenant's claim.
  • The assured periodic tenancy agreement was in compliance with the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £855 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in this case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, determining the rent according to the statutory requirements.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the statutory requirements for rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on rent determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The lease agreement and statutory requirements were considered important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.