First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the property's condition and compared it to similar properties in the area. The rent was set at £800 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on the property's condition and market comparables.
📖 What the law says
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for the property in the open market, taking into account the property's condition and market comparables.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy based on market comparables and the property's condition. The rent was set at £800 per month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/40UE/MNR/2024/0078
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Taunton, Somerset, [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [NAME] c/o [NAME], The Old Workshop, Ilminster, Somerset, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 800.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 April 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 September 2021
5. Length of the term or rental period 6 months
6. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises A ‘back-to-back’ two storey estate house with 2 bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom/wc, front garden.
[NAME] of Decision 31 May 2024
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : CHI/40UE/MNR/2024/0078 Property : [ADDRESS], Taunton, Somerset, [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : None Respondent : [redacted] : None Type of application : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] : Paper determination Date of decision : 31st May 2024
DECISION
2 Decision of the tribunal (1) The Tribunal determines that the rent that the property in its current condition as at the 1st April 2024 might reasonably be expected to achieve in the open market under an assured periodic tenancy is £800 per month Background 1. The tenant has lived in the property as assured periodic tenant since 1st September 2021 with a tenancy agreement of the same date.
2. On the 28th February 2024 the Landlord served a notice pursuant to section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 seeking to increase the rent from £625 per month to £850 per month, being an increase of £225 effective from 1st April 2024.
3. By an application dated 22nd March 2024, the tenant referred that Notice to the Tribunal for a determination of the market rent. The Tribunal issued Directions for the conduct of the matter on 24th April 2024.
4. The Tribunal considered the matter suitable for a determination on the papers and therefore a hearing was not necessary. The parties did not disagree with this arrangement. The Evidence 5. The Tribunal has before it a bundle of evidence which includes a background to the case, the application, the Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement and the directions. The Landlord and the Tenant each completed the Rent Appeal Statements with photographs and copies of invoices for repair and maintenance works. The Landlord provided comparable evidence of [ADDRESS] and the tenant provided brief details of two properties to rent in the area. Inspection 7. The Tribunal did not inspect the property and relied on the information provided by the parties, [NAME], [ADDRESS] and its expert knowledge. The property is a “back to back” two storey house with brick elevations and pitched roof. The property forms part of an established estate with access to town centre amenities.
8. The accommodation comprises: 2 bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom, There is no central heating with only an electric heater in the
3 living room. Enclosed rear garden. It is stated curtains and white goods were provided by the Landlord. The Law 9. The rules governing a determination are set out in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. In particular, the Tribunal is to determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “sitting tenant”) and any increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, exterior and any installations pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the tenant for interior decoration. The Valuation 10. Having carefully considered all the evidence from the Landlord and the Tenant the Tribunal considers that an achievable rent for the property in a good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom fittings, modern services with carpets curtains and white goods provided by the Landlord would be £850 per month This figure is based upon the comparable evidence provided by the Landlord and the Tribunal’s professional judgement and experience. 11 The Tribunal has considered carefully the parties submissions and using its own expertise, we consider a deduction of £50 should be applied to take into account for the dated condition of the fittings, the poor condition of the carpets, and no curtains and white goods. This reduces the rental figure to £800 per month. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based on capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant. 12 The average rent for rental properties in the Taunton area has increased every quarter since the end of 2020, according to the online property portal [NAME]. The rent increases are due to not enough properties coming to the market to meet demand and the number of homes for rent is 46 per cent below 2020 levels. This puts this decision in context with the current rental market.
13. The Tribunal has been provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement, which incorporates the usual repair obligations.
4 14. The Tribunal received no evidence of hardship from the tenant and, therefore, the rent determined by the tribunal is to take effect from 1st April 2024.
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Roof Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) RTM Company Granted Dispensation for Urgent Electrical Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Financial Penalty to £500
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Urgent Lift Repairs Dispensation in First-tier Tribunal Ca…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Fire Safety Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy: First-tier Tribunal Decision
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal determined the rent based on the property's current condition as of April 1, 2024.
- The tribunal considered comparable evidence provided by the landlord to establish a market rent.
- A deduction of £50 was applied due to the dated condition of fittings, poor carpets, and lack of curtains and white goods.
- The tribunal's professional judgment and experience were used to determine the achievable rent.
- The rent increase was put into context by the general rise in average rents in the Taunton area.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy was set at £800 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market comparables, setting the rent at £800 per month.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparability to similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, as the rent was set at £800 per month.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should gather evidence on the property's condition and market comparables to support their case.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and copies of invoices for repair and maintenance works, as well as comparable evidence of other properties, mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.
