VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Service Charge Reasonableness

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the reasonableness of service charges for a leaseholder, including insurance and management fees, based on the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

⚖️ Legal holding

Service charges are reasonable if they are incurred for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements, insurance, or management of a reasonable standard.

Topics

service chargesleaseholder responsibilities

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.18

A 'service charge' refers to an amount paid by a tenant as part of or in addition to rent for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements, insurance, or the landlord's management costs. It can vary based on the actual costs incurred.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.19

Service charges should only cover costs that are reasonably incurred and must be for services or works of a reasonable standard. If the costs are not yet incurred, the charge should still be reasonable, and adjustments will be made once the actual costs are known.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal determined the reasonableness of service charges for a leaseholder.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the reasonableness of service charges for a leaseholder, including insurance premiums and management fees, based on the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BE/LSC/2019/0026 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : Mr [COUNSEL] of [NAME] Respondent : [redacted] : In Person Type of [NAME] : For the determination of the reasonableness of and the liability to pay a service charge Tribunal members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 12 March 2019

DECISION

2

Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the sums of (i) £13,905.50, (ii)£183.60 and £458.50 are payable by the Respondent in respect of the service charges for the years 2018-2019. (2) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this Decision The [NAME]

1. The Applicant seeks a determination pursuant to s.27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the 1985 Act”) as to the amount of service charges payable by the Respondent in respect of the service charge years 2018-2019.

2. The relevant legal provisions are set out in the Appendix to this decision. The hearing 3. The case was considered on paper at [ADDRESS]. Written representations were received from both parties. The background 4. The property which is the subject of this [NAME] is a two-storey terraced house converted into two flats.

5. Photographs of the building were provided in the hearing bundle. The respondent requested an inspection but the tribunal did not consider that one was necessary, nor would it have been proportionate to the issues in dispute.

6. The Respondent holds a long lease of the property which requires the landlord to provide services and the tenant to contribute towards their costs by way of a variable service charge. The specific provisions of the lease will be referred to below, where appropriate. The issues 7. At the start of the hearing the parties identified the relevant issues for determination as follows:

3 (i) The payability and reasonableness of advance service charges for 2018-2019 relating to external repairs and general management.

8. Having considered all of the documents provided, the tribunal has made determinations on the various issues as follows. Insurance 9. The landlord has provided a service charge budget for the year 2018 to 2019. The budget shows an insurance premium for the building of £524.58 of which the lessee’s responsibility is for 35%. There is no evidence before the tribunal to suggest this is not a reasonable premium. The tribunal’s decision 10. The tribunal determines that the amount payable in respect of insurance is £183.60 being 35% of £524.58

. Management fees 11. Management fees are claimed in two parts. Firstly a fee of £560 being the general management fee and secondly a managing agent’s fee of £750 for the section 20 consultation. Each of these is claimed at a rate of 50%. No explanation is given for the percentage charge. The tribunal’s decision 12. The tribunal determines that the amount payable in respect of management fees is £655.00 being 50% of £1310. Reasons for the tribunal’s decision 13. The service charge percentage is set in the lease at 35% applicable to the ground floor flat. No explanation has been given as to why 50% has been charged. However, the rate has not been challenged in the leaseholder’s response. The tribunal notes that a 50% charge was accepted by a differently constituted tribunal in a case concerning the first floor flat under reference LON/ooBE/LSC/2018/0283. While that decision is not binding on this tribunal, clause 3 (4) of the lease arguably gives the landlord some discretion over the percentage and as the rate is not challenged, we accept it.

4 External repairs 14. External repairs and general items are claimed in the sum of £13,905.50 being 35% of £39,730 as set out in the table below. Fire Risk Assessment 380.00 £ EICR 350.00 £ External repairs S20 35,000.00 £ Minor repairs/General reserve 3,500.00 £ Balance to carry forward 1,000.00 £ 40,230.00 £ Demanded contributions less 500.00 -£ 39,730.00 £ 35% 13,905.50 £

15. The main area of complaint by the respondent is in relation to the external repairs in the sum of £35,000. The respondent considers this figure to be excessive. No alternative specification or comparable estimate is provided. The remaining items were not challenged.

16. The claimant landlord has provided a detailed specification prepared by a chartered building surveyor and copies of three estimates obtained as part of a consultation under section 20 of the landlord and tenant act 1985. The tribunal notes that this was accepted in the case relating to the first-floor flat as being a reasonable estimate. This tribunal agrees with that view. The tribunal’s decision 17. The tribunal finds that the amount claimed of £13,905.50 for the items listed above is reasonable in respect of an advance service charge. When the works have been completed, the final reconciliation of the service charge will be challengeable by the leaseholder under section 27A in respect of items which may be unreasonable.

Name: [NAME]

Date: 12 March 2019

Valuer Chair

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.

5 If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

6 Appendix of relevant legislation

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (as amended) Section 18 (1) In the following provisions of this Act "service charge" means an amount payable by a tenant of a dwelling as part of or in addition to the rent - (a) which is payable, directly or indirectly, for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements or insurance or the landlord's costs of management, and (b) the whole or part of which varies or may vary according to the relevant costs. (2) The relevant costs are the costs or estimated costs incurred or to be incurred by or on behalf of the landlord, or a [NAME], in connection with the matters for which the service charge is payable. (3) For this purpose - (a) "costs" includes overheads, and (b) costs are relevant costs in relation to a service charge whether they are incurred, or to be incurred, in the period for which the service charge is payable or in an earlier or later period. Section 19 (1) Relevant costs shall be taken into account in determining the amount of a service charge payable for a period - (a) only to the extent that they are reasonably incurred, and (b) where they are incurred on the provisions of services or the carrying out of works, only if the services or works are of a reasonable standard; and the amount payable shall be limited accordingly. (2) Where a service charge is payable before the relevant costs are incurred, no greater amount than is reasonable is so payable, and after the relevant costs have been incurred any necessary adjustment shall be made by repayment, reduction or subsequent charges or otherwise. Section 27A (1) An [NAME] may be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether a service charge is payable and, if it is, as to - (a) the person by whom it is payable, (b) the person to whom it is payable, (c) the amount which is payable,

7 (d) the date at or by which it is payable, and (e) the manner in which it is payable. (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not any payment has been made. (3) An [NAME] may also be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether, if costs were incurred for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements, insurance or management of any specified description, a service charge would be payable for the costs and, if it would, as to - (a) the person by whom it would be payable, (b) the person to whom it would be payable, (c) the amount which would be payable, (d) the date at or by which it would be payable, and (e) the manner in which it would be payable. (4) No [NAME] under subsection (1) or (3) may be made in respect of a matter which - (a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant, (b) has been, or is to be, referred to arbitration pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement to which the tenant is a party, (c) has been the subject of determination by a court, or (d) has been the subject of determination by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement. (5) But the tenant is not to be taken to have agreed or admitted any matter by reason only of having made any payment. Section 20 (1) Where this section applies to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the relevant contributions of tenants are limited in accordance with subsection (6) or (7) (or both) unless the consultation requirements have been either— (a) complied with in relation to the works or agreement, or (b) dispensed with in relation to the works or agreement by (or on appeal from) the appropriate tribunal . (2) In this section “relevant contribution”, in relation to a tenant and any works or agreement, is the amount which he may be required under the terms of his lease to contribute (by the payment of service charges) to relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works or under the agreement. (3) This section applies to qualifying works if relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works exceed an appropriate amount. (4) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that this section applies to a qualifying long term agreement—

8 (a) if relevant costs incurred under the agreement exceed an appropriate amount, or (b) if relevant costs incurred under the agreement during a period prescribed by the regulations exceed an appropriate amount. (5) An appropriate amount is an amount set by regulations made by the Secretary of State; and the regulations may make provision for either or both of the following to be an appropriate amount— (a) an amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations, and (b) an amount which results in the relevant contribution of any one or more tenants being an amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations. (6) Where an appropriate amount is set by virtue of paragraph (a) of subsection (5), the amount of the relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works or under the agreement which may be taken into account in determining the relevant contributions of tenants is limited to the appropriate amount. (7) Where an appropriate amount is set by virtue of paragraph (b) of that subsection, the amount of the relevant contribution of the tenant, or each of the tenants, whose relevant contribution would otherwise exceed the amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations is limited to the amount so prescribed or determined.] Section 20B (1) If any of the relevant costs taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge were incurred more than 18 months before a demand for payment of the service charge is served on the tenant, then (subject to subsection (2)), the tenant shall not be liable to pay so much of the service charge as reflects the costs so incurred. (2) Subsection (1) shall not apply if, within the period of 18 months beginning with the date when the relevant costs in question were incurred, the tenant was notified in writing that those costs had been incurred and that he would subsequently be required under the terms of his lease to contribute to them by the payment of a service charge. Section 20C (1) A tenant may make an [NAME] for an order that all or any of the costs incurred, or to be incurred, by the landlord in connection with proceedings before a court, residential property tribunal or the Upper Tribunal, or in connection with arbitration proceedings, are

9 not to be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge payable by the tenant or any other person or persons specified in the [NAME]. (2) The [NAME] shall be made— (a) in the case of court proceedings, to the court before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, to a county court; (aa) in the case of proceedings before a residential property tribunal, to that tribunal; (b) in the case of proceedings before a residential property tribunal, to the tribunal before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, to any residential property tribunal; (c) in the case of proceedings before the Upper Tribunal, to the tribunal; (d) in the case of arbitration proceedings, to the arbitral tribunal or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, to a county court. (3) The court or tribunal to which the [NAME] is made may make such order on the [NAME] as it considers just and equitable in the circumstances. Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 Schedule 11, paragraph 1 (1) In this Part of this Schedule “administration charge” means an amount payable by a tenant of a dwelling as part of or in addition to the rent which is payable, directly or indirectly— (a) for or in connection with the grant of approvals under his lease, or applications for such approvals, (b) for or in connection with the provision of information or documents by or on behalf of the landlord or a person who is party to his lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant, (c) in respect of a failure by the tenant to make a payment by the due date to the landlord or a person who is party to his lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant, or (d) in connection with a breach (or alleged breach) of a covenant or condition in his lease. (2) But an amount payable by the tenant of a dwelling the rent of which is registered under Part 4 of the Rent Act 1977 (c. 42) is not an administration charge, unless the amount registered is entered as a variable amount in pursuance of section 71(4) of that Act.

10 (3) In this Part of this Schedule “variable administration charge” means an administration charge payable by a tenant which is neither— (a) specified in his lease, nor (b) calculated in accordance with a formula specified in his lease. (4) An order amending sub-paragraph (1) may be made by the appropriate national authority. Schedule 11, paragraph 2 A variable administration charge is payable only to the extent that the amount of the charge is reasonable. Schedule 11, paragraph 5 (1) An [NAME] may be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether an administration charge is payable and, if it is, as to— (a) the person by whom it is payable, (b) the person to whom it is payable, (c) the amount which is payable, (d) the date at or by which it is payable, and (e) the manner in which it is payable. (2) Sub-paragraph (1) applies whether or not any payment has been made. (3) The jurisdiction conferred on the appropriate tribunal in respect of any matter by virtue of sub-paragraph (1) is in addition to any jurisdiction of a court in respect of the matter. (4) No [NAME] under sub-paragraph (1) may be made in respect of a matter which— (a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant, (b) has been, or is to be, referred to arbitration pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement to which the tenant is a party, (c) has been the subject of determination by a court, or (d) has been the subject of determination by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement. (5) But the tenant is not to be taken to have agreed or admitted any matter by reason only of having made any payment. (6) An agreement by the tenant of a dwelling (other than a post-dispute arbitration agreement) is void in so far as it purports to provide for a determination— (a) in a particular manner, or

11 (b) on particular evidence, of any question which may be the subject matter of an [NAME] under sub-paragraph (1).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 8 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Service charges are considered reasonable if they cover services, repairs, maintenance, improvements, insurance, or management.
  • Service charges are deemed reasonable if they align with the lease agreement and statutory requirements.
  • Service charges are seen as reasonable if they are of a reasonable standard and properly served.
  • Service charges are allowed if they are incurred for necessary services and repairs.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • Service charges may be dismissed if they do not meet the reasonable standard despite covering services, repairs, maintenance, improvements, or insurance.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal determined the reasonableness of service charges for a leaseholder.

Who was involved?

The case involved a leaseholder and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the service charges were reasonable based on the evidence provided and the relevant legal provisions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 was applied, specifically sections 18, 19, and 27A.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the evidence provided to show that the service charges were reasonable and necessary.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, confirming the reasonableness of the service charges.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure that their service charges are reasonable and supported by evidence.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as detailed specifications and estimates for repairs and management fees mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving service charges.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.