First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Property Repairs
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord's request for dispensation from consultation requirements when undertaking urgent repairs to prevent water damage in flats. The decision was based on the need for immediate action and lack of objections from a person.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord is entitled to seek dispensation from consultation requirements when undertaking urgent temporary works to prevent damage to a property.
📖 What the law says
The appropriate tribunal can grant a request to skip consultation requirements for certain works or long-term agreements if it finds it reasonable to do so.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal granted dispensation for urgent repairs under s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📜 Headnote Official document
The tribunal granted dispensation to the landlord seeking urgent temporary works under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, allowing repairs without full consultation due to the urgency of preventing water ingress.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00BJ/LDC/2023/0112 Property : 140 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : [COUNSEL] [NAME], Property Administrator Respondents : [redacted] London Sw12 0DD as per the [NAME] : N/A
Type of [NAME] : [NAME] for dispensation to consult – section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Tribunal : Judge Tagliavini Date of decision : 8 August 2023
__________________________________________________________________________
DECISION
2
The tribunal’s summary decision
(1.) The tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) in respect of urgent temporary works of repair carried out by the contractors [COMPANY] and [NAME], to prevent water ingress from a box gutter and a breakdown in the surface on the balcony of Flats 7 and 10 into the building at 140 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] and Flats 10, 7 and 3.
_________________________________________________________
The [NAME]
1. This is an [NAME] made pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) seeking dispensation for the consultation requirements in respect of the works required to remedy the ingress of water from a box gutter and balconies into the building known as [ADDRESS], London SW12 oDD (‘the premises’) and into other flats in the building.
Background
2. The subject premises comprises a detached Victorian house converted into ten self-contained flats.
3. The Applicant has applied for dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of urgent temporary repairs to the balcony surfaces of Flat 10. This is to prevent further water from entering Flats 7 and 3 and minimise the damage caused following a leak from a box gutter on the roof which started on the balcony at Flat 10 and travelled downwards causing damage to the flats 7 and 3 below. The estimated cost of the works has not been provided. B. No notice has been given to the [NAME] of the intended works.
4. The tribunal was satisfied the [NAME] had been informed of this [NAME] no response/objections have been received by the tribunal from the respondents as stated in an email to the tribunal from the applicant dated 1 June 2023.
The hearing
5. The [NAME] was determined by the tribunal on the papers as no party requested an oral hearing. In [NAME] its decision the tribunal took into account the information provided by the applicant by way of a bundle comprising 56 pages in addition to the [NAME] and the accompanying documents. No documentation was received from the respondent.
3
The tribunal’s decision and reasons
6. The tribunal grants dispensation pursuant to s.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) in respect of the works of repair to the box gutter and balconies at the subject premises.
7. The tribunal has had regard to the urgent nature of the works as evidenced by the reports included in the documents provided to the tribunal and the absence of any objection by the respondent to either the works that have been carried out or to this [NAME]. The tribunal has also considered the absence of prejudice caused by the lack of consultation pursuant to section 20 of the 2985 Act in respect of the works for which the applicant seeks dispensation. Therefore, in the circumstances the tribunal considers it reasonable and proportionate to grant the [NAME] sought; [COMPANY] v Benson and others [2013] UKSC 14.
Name: Judge Tagliavini
Date: 8 August 2023
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
4
The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Halts Market Rent Determination Until Valid Notice Confirmed
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reviews Pitch Fee Increase Based on CPI
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy: First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Management Company Allowed Urgent Lift Repairs Without Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Works on Residential Estate
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Allows Freeholder to Vary Leases for Sinking Fund and I…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Urgent Fire Safety Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) RTM Company Granted Dispensation for Urgent Electrical Repairs
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal granted dispensation for urgent temporary repairs to prevent water from entering the building.
- The tribunal considered the urgent nature of the works, supported by reports provided in the documents.
- The respondent did not object to the works or the application for dispensation.
- The lack of consultation did not cause prejudice to the respondent.
- The tribunal found it reasonable and proportionate to grant the application given the circumstances.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal granted dispensation to the landlord to carry out urgent temporary works without full consultation.
Who was involved?
A landlord and leaseholders in a property with water damage issues.
How did the court decide, and why?
The decision was made based on the urgency of the repairs and the lack of objections from leaseholders.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 was used to grant dispensation.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The urgency of preventing further water damage was the key factor in granting dispensation.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
It was for the landlord, allowing them to proceed with repairs without full consultation.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing urgent repair issues can seek dispensation if they meet the criteria set by section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Reports showing the urgency of repairs were key, as well as confirmation that leaseholders had been informed.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, an application for permission to appeal must be made within 28 days to the First-tier Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
