VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Grants Five-Year Recognition Certificate to Tenants' Association

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal granted a certificate of recognition to a tenants' association for the Twentywell Riverview Apartments for five years, allowing them certain rights under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenants' association is entitled to a certificate of recognition if it meets the criteria set out in the Tenants’ Associations Regulations 2018.

Topics

tenants' associationscertificates of recognition

Provisions

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.20CTenants’ Associations (Provisions Relating to Recognition and Provision of Information) (England) Regulations 2018

📖 Technical summary

A tenants' association was granted a certificate of recognition for five years.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal granted a certificate of recognition to a tenants' association for the Twentywell Riverview Apartments for a period of five years, based on the Tenants’ Associations Regulations 2018.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

Case Reference : MAN/00CG/HTA/2021/0004

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant : [redacted]

Respondent : [redacted] : [NAME] of Applications : Application for a certificate of recognition of a [COMPANY] Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 – s 20C

Tribunal Member : Judge L Bennett

Date and venue of hearing : Determined without a hearing

Date of Decision : 24 January 2023

DECISION

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

DECISION

The Tribunal grants a certificate of recognition to [COMPANY] for a period of 5 years.

REASONS

Background

1. On 15 November 2021, the Tribunal received an application for a certificate of recognition for [COMPANY], being a recently established [COMPANY] in relation to Premises known as [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“the Premises”).

2. The application was made under section 29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the Act”). The Respondent is [APPELLANT], the freehold owner of the Premises (and the landlord under the long leases). [RESPONDENT] is the sole director and shareholder of [COMPANY].

3. I have not inspected the Premises, but I understand it to comprise of twelve, two- bedroom apartments constructed over three levels with four apartments to each level.

4. On 27 May 2022, the Tribunal gave directions for the conduct of this matter. The parties were informed that the application would be determined on the papers unless either party gave notice requiring an oral hearing to be arranged. No such notice was received, and I have therefore determined this application upon consideration of the papers supplied by the parties.

Law 5. An association which is a “[COMPANY]” as defined by section 29(1) of the Act has certain rights concerning the management of the Premises concerned: it has the right:–

• to nominate contractors for tender in a statutory consultation process carried out by the landlord under section 20 of the Act; • to be sent copy estimates obtained for the purposes of such a consultation process; • to ask for a summary of costs incurred by a landlord (section 21); • to inspect relevant accounts and receipts for expenditure (section 22); • to ask for a written summary of insurance cover; and • to ask to be consulted about appointment or re-appointment of a managing agent (section 30B).

6. An [COMPANY] may be recognised for these purposes by notice given by the landlord. Alternatively, it may be recognised by a certificate given by the Tribunal under section 29(1)(b)(i) of the Act.

7. In deciding whether to grant a certificate of recognition, the Tribunal must apply the Tenants’ Associations (Provisions Relating to Recognition and Provision of Information) (England) Regulations 2018 (“the Regulations”).

8. Regulation 3 lists the following matters to which the Tribunal must have regard when deciding whether to give a certificate of recognition:

• the composition of the membership of the [COMPANY]; • the [COMPANY]’s rules regarding membership, including whether tenants who are not qualifying tenants are entitled to become members; • the [COMPANY]’s rules regarding decision making; • the [COMPANY]’s rules regarding voting; • the extent to which any fees or charges payable in connection with membership of the [COMPANY] apply equally to all members; • the extent to which the constitution of the [COMPANY] takes account of the interests of all members; • the extent to which the [COMPANY] is independent of the landlord of the dwellings to which the association relates; • whether the [COMPANY] has a chairperson, secretary and treasurer; • whether the constitution of the [COMPANY] may be amended by resolution of the members and the rules regarding amendment; • whether the [COMPANY]’s constitution, accounts and list of members are kept up to date; and available for public inspection; and • the extent to which the association operates in an open and transparent way.

9. Regulation 4 provides that the Tribunal must not give a certificate of recognition in certain circumstances: where the [COMPANY] represents fewer than 50% of the qualifying tenants; where a previous certificate is still in force; and where the Tribunal is not satisfied that the constitution and rules of the [COMPANY] are fair and democratic.

Grounds for the application 10. The Applicant’s statement of case provided a detailed a list of reasons of how [COMPANY] complies with each paragraph of Regulation 3.

11. The Applicant submits that the [COMPANY] has membership from 11 out of the 12 apartments and therefore the residents at the Premises desire a [COMPANY] to represent the majority view of residents on matters of common interest that impact on individuals both financially and on their wellbeing.

Respondent’s Submissions 12. The Respondent’s submissions clarify the ownership of the freehold Premises and that the [NAME] of the Premises pay a variable service charge in accordance with Schedule 1 of the leases granted.

13. The Respondent reserves its position as to whether or not the Applicant’s application meets the necessary requirements for recognition as a [COMPANY] by the Tribunal.

14. The Respondent submits that if a certificate of recognition is awarded, the [COMPANY]’s powers would not extend to matters concerning the redecoration of the communal interior of the flats, nor would it extend to when the work is completed and what materials and colours are used.

Consideration

15. The Tribunal is advised that [NAME] from 11 of the 12 apartments at the Premises are members of the association. The applicant has demonstrated written consent from members in 10 of those apartments.

16. It appears that the landlord does not object to the recognition of the [COMPANY]. The landlord has however, expressed concerns as to the members’ views of the rights this recognition will bring. The scope and powers of a recognised tenant’s association are set out in law as highlighted in paragraph 5 of this decision. The Tribunal can neither extend nor limit these rights.

17. I am satisfied that there are no circumstances which prevent the Tribunal giving a certificate of recognition in this case. Indeed, having reviewed a copy of the association’s rules and constitution and having had regard to the matters specified in Regulation 3, I am satisfied that it is appropriate to give such a certificate, and that the association should thereby be recognised under the Act for a period of five years.

Costs

18. It is open to tenants to apply to be a [COMPANY] and exercise their right to ask the Tribunal for a certificate of recognition. In this case, the landlord has solely involved themselves to submit that the [COMPANY] operates within the scope of its statutory remit. It appears that costs may have incurred in responding to the comments made in paragraph 1.3 of the Applicant’s statement of case dated 6 June 2022, not through the landlord’s imposition.

Accordingly, I do not find grounds to make an order under section 20c of the Act. Any dispute as to the reasonableness of a resulting service charge would be a matter for a separate application to the Tribunal.

First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Residential Property

CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION

An application from [COMPANY] for a Certificate of Recognition under the provisions of Section 29 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985, as amended by Paragraph 10 of Schedule 2 to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 has been considered by:

Judge Bennett

who is a person appointed to act as a member of the First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber.

This is to certify that

[COMPANY]

is a [COMPANY] for the purpose of the aforementioned Section.

The Certificate will be valid for a period of 5 years commencing on 24 January 2023, unless previously cancelled.

Signed: Judge L Bennett

(one of the persons appointed by the Lord Chancellor as a member of the First-tier Tribunal)

Date: 24 January 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenants' association meets the criteria set out in the Tenants’ Associations Regulations 2018.
  • The tenants' association operates democratically and fairly.
  • The tenants' association meets the statutory requirements.
  • There is no relevant prejudice identified by the leaseholders.
  • Works are urgent and necessary.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to grant a certificate of recognition to a tenants' association for five years.

Who was involved?

The tenants' association and the landlord of the property were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant the certificate because the association met the criteria set out in the regulations.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the Tenants’ Associations Regulations 2018 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the association complied with the regulations.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenants' association.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation could also apply for a certificate of recognition if they meet the criteria.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The association's rules and constitution were important documents.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.