First-tier Tribunal lacks jurisdiction over market rent notice
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal ruled it lacks the power to decide on the validity of a Notice of Increase for market rent under the Housing Act 1988. The decision was based on procedural issues and the Tribunal's lack of jurisdiction.
⚖️ Legal holding
A Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine whether a Notice of Increase for market rent is valid.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent. The notice must be in a prescribed form and specify a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period of the tenancy.
A tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy, provided the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to determine the validity of a Notice of Increase for market rent under the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal received an application under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 regarding a Notice of Increase for market rent. The Tribunal found it lacked jurisdiction to determine the validity of the notice due to procedural issues and decided it does not have jurisdiction to determine the application.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/OOAD/MDR/2024/0314 Property : 54 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Representative : In Person Respondent: [redacted] : In Person Type of application : Market Rent under s13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Jurisdiction Tribunal member(s) :
[NAME] MA LLM FRICS Judge Tueje
Date and venue of hearing : In Person Date of decision : 30 August 2024
DECISION
2 Decision of the Tribunal The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine this application for the reasons stated below. Background 1. The Tribunal received an Application from the Tenant dated 29 May 2023, under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
2. Only the jurisdiction point was addressed.
3. The hearing was attended by the two parties and carried out remotely by video platform. The Law 4. The Tribunal wrote to the parties on the 24 July 2024, with a preliminary view that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction noting; The case of Mooney v Whitehead [2023] EWCA Civ 67] confirmed that the Tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to determine whether a Notice of Increase for all purposes is valid or not. However, the Tribunal is entitled to decide whether it is satisfied, on balance, that the legal and factual matrix forming the background to the Application demonstrates that it has jurisdiction. In the current case it appears:
The Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent may be defective, as it does not appear to take effect at the commencement of a new period of the tenancy. In practical terms, this means that the proposed new rent may not be payable from the date specified.
Applicants' submissions 5. The Applicant’s submissions comprised;
An Application form dated 29 May 2024.
Notice of Increase of Rent dated 15 May 2024 where the Landlord proposed an increase from £1450.00 per month to £1800.00 0er month with effect from 11 June 2024.
Additionally, the Tribunal was furnished with a copy of the tenancy agreement, commencing on the 12 June 2022 ending on 11 June 2024.
Respondents' submission
2 6. The Respondent noted that they carried out their functions as a Landlord through a property agent.
The Hearing
7.The Parties reiterated their submissions. In the case of the Respondent Landlord, they noted that their [NAME] had approached the Tenants with an indication that the rent may increase, but without quantification, in December 2023. The actual amount of the increase was confirmed by further communication on 16 March 2023. The Notice of Increase being served on the 15 May 2024.
The Decision 8. The contractual tenancy finished on 11 June 2024. The statutory periodic tenancy commenced therefore on the 12 June 2024. This is the date of the start of the rental period. For the Notice of Increase to be valid it must propose a rent effective from the start of a rental period. This being the 12th of the month.
9. The Tribunal finds that the Notice of Increase of Rent is probably invalid in that respect.
10. Additionally, the Notice was served on the 15 May 2024 some 13 days before the intended effective date of the commencement of the new Rent. The minimum period under statute is one month. The Tribunal finds therefore the Notice to be probably invalid on this second point also. 11.The Tribunal finds the Notice to be probably invalid on two grounds. The Tribunal therefore does not have jurisdiction to determine a rent under section 13 under this application. Name: [NAME]: 30 August 2024
2
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written Application for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The Application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the Application. If the Application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such Application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the Application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The Application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the Application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further Application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
2 THE LEGISLATION Housing Act 1988 s.13.— Increases of rent under assured periodic tenancies. (1) This section applies to— (a) a statutory periodic tenancy other than one which, by virtue of paragraph 11 or paragraph 12 in Part I of Schedule 1 to this Act, cannot for the time being be an assured tenancy; and (b) any other periodic tenancy which is an assured tenancy, other than one in relation to which there is a provision, for the time being binding on the tenant, under which the rent for a particular period of the tenancy will or may be greater than the rent for an earlier period. (2) For the purpose of securing an increase in the rent under a tenancy to which this section applies, the landlord may serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy specified in the notice, being a period beginning not earlier than— (a) the minimum period after the date of the service of the notice; and (b) except in the case of a statutory periodic [tenancy—] [ (i) in the case of an [NAME], the first anniversary of the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; (ii) in any other case, on the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the first period of the tenancy began; and ] (c) if the rent under the tenancy has previously been increased by virtue of a notice under this subsection or a determination under section 14[below—] [ (i) in the case of an [NAME], the first anniversary of the date on which the increased rent took effect; (ii) in any other case, the appropriate date. ] (3) The minimum period referred to in subsection (2) above is— (a) in the case of a yearly tenancy, six months; (b) in the case of a tenancy where the period is less than a month, one month; and (c) in any other case, a period equal to the period of the tenancy. [ (3A) The appropriate date referred to in subsection (2)(c)(ii) above is— (a) in a case to which subsection (3B) below applies, the date that falls 53 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect; (b) in any other case, the date that falls 52 weeks after the date on which the increased rent took effect. (3B) This subsection applies where— (a) the rent under the tenancy has been increased by virtue of a notice under this section or a determination under section 14 below on at least one occasion after the coming into force of the Regulatory Reform (Assured Periodic Tenancies) (Rent Increases) Order 2003; and (b) the fifty-third week after the date on which the last such increase took effect begins more than six days before the anniversary of the date on which the first such increase took effect.
2 ] (4) Where a notice is served under subsection (2) above, a new rent specified in the notice shall take effect as mentioned in the notice unless, before the beginning of the new period specified in the notice,— (a) the tenant by an application in the prescribed form refers the notice to [the appropriate tribunal] ; or (b) the landlord and the tenant agree on a variation of the rent which is different from that proposed in the notice or agree that the rent should not be varied. (5) Nothing in this section (or in section 14 below) affects the right of the landlord and the tenant under an assured tenancy to vary by agreement any term of the tenancy (including a term relating to rent).
s.14.— Determination of rent by [tribunal] . (1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to [the appropriate tribunal] a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the [appropriate tribunal]3 shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the [appropriate tribunal]3 consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and
2 (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit. [ (3A) In making a determination under this section in any case where under Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a [NAME] is liable to pay council tax in respect of a hereditament (“the relevant hereditament”) of which the dwelling-house forms part, the [appropriate tribunal] shall have regard to the amount of council tax which, as at the date on which the notice under section 13(2) above was served, was set by the billing authority— (a) for the financial year in which that notice was served, and (b) for the category of dwellings within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date, but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of council tax payable shall be disregarded. (3B) In subsection (3A) above— (a) “hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, (b) “billing authority” has the same meaning as in that Part of that Act, and (c) “category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in section 30(1) and (2) of that Act. (4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 , but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture [, in respect of council tax] or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements. (5) Where any rates in respect of the dwelling-house concerned are borne by the landlord or a [NAME], the [appropriate tribunal] shall make their determination under this section as if the rates were not so borne. (6) In any case where— (a) [the appropriate tribunal] have before them at the same time the reference of a notice under section 6(2) above relating to a tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 6 reference”) and the reference of a notice under section 13(2) above relating to the same tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 13 reference”), and (b) the date specified in the notice under section 6(2) above is not later than the first day of the new period specified in the notice under section 13(2) above, and (c) the [appropriate tribunal]9 propose to hear the two references together, the [appropriate tribunal] shall make a determination in relation to the section 6 reference before making their determination in relation to the section 13 reference and, accordingly, in such a case the reference in subsection (1)(c) above to the terms of the tenancy to which the notice relates
2 shall be construed as a reference to those terms as varied by virtue of the determination made in relation to the section 6 reference. (7) Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to [the appropriate tribunal] , then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by [the appropriate tribunal] (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to [the appropriate tribunal] that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the committee may direct. (8) Nothing in this section requires [the appropriate tribunal] to continue with their determination of a rent for a dwelling-house if the landlord and tenant give notice in writing that they no longer require such a determination or if the tenancy has come to an end. (9) This section shall apply in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy as if in subsection (1) the reference to an assured tenancy were a reference to an assured shorthold tenancy.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Tenant’s Rent Challenge
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination: How Tribunals Set Rental Prices
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules Service Charges Reasonable and Payable
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Tenant’s Service Charge Challenge
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord's Reasonable Excuse Prevents Rent Repayment Order
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord's Reasonable Excuse for Not Obtaining License Dismisses Rent Repay…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Appoints Property Manager Under Landlord and Tenant Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Decides Collective Enfranchisement Claim
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal dismisses service charge challenge
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Invalid Rent Increase Notice
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Confirms Prohibition Orders Against Non-Conforming HMOs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Claim for Unlicensed HMO
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine the validity of a Notice of Increase for market rent.
- Service charges and administration fees are considered payable and reasonable unless proven otherwise.
- Nominee purchasers are entitled to acquire the freehold of a property under specific legislation.
- Service charges and administration fees are deemed reasonable and payable if they comply with legal standards.
- A tribunal may appoint a manager under section 24 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 if certain conditions are met.
- Local authorities can issue prohibition orders against HMOs that do not meet space standards.
- Landlords are not liable for rent repayment orders if they can prove a reasonable excuse for not obtaining a license.
- A tribunal must determine market rent based on general rental values and comparable local properties.
- Tenants cannot make applications under section 22 of the Housing Act 1988 after six months from the start of the tenancy.
- Landlords cannot be found guilty of operating unlicensed HMOs without sufficient evidence from tenants.
- Applications for review of defective notices of rent increases fall outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to determine the validity of a Notice of Increase for market rent.
Who was involved?
The case involved a tenant and a landlord, both representing themselves.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided it lacked jurisdiction because the notice was not validly served according to the Housing Act 1988.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the notice was not validly served as it did not specify the correct start date of the new rent period.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure that any notice of rent increase is validly served according to the Housing Act 1988.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The tenancy agreement and the Notice of Increase of Rent were important documents.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving legal disputes.
