VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Recognises Tenants' Association Under Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal granted recognition to a Tenants' Association under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, confirming the association's eligibility based on its rules and support from more than 80% of the tenants.

⚖️ Legal holding

A Tenants' Association is entitled to recognition under section 29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 if it meets the statutory requirements.

Topics

tenancy recognitionLandlord and Tenant Act 1985

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.29

A recognized tenants' association can be formed by either a written notice from the landlord to the association's secretary or a certificate issued by the First-tier Tribunal for dwellings in England. To qualify, the association must consist of at least one group of tenants who are required to pay a service charge under their leases.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The First-tier Tribunal granted recognition to a Tenants' Association under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal granted recognition to a Tenants' Association under section 29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, noting the association's compliance with statutory requirements including over 80% of qualifying tenants supporting the application.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference :

LON/00BG/HTA/2019/0001

Property :

[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant : [redacted] Landlord : Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] of application : Section 29 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (1985 Act) – application for the recognition of a Tenants’ Association

Tribunal Member :

[NAME] (Econ) MSc MRICS

Date

:

12 December 2019

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2019

2 DECISION AND REASONS

Introduction: 1.) This matter arises from an application made by [COMPANY] ([NAME]) for recognition of a Tenants’ Association under section 29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. The application was dated 5 April 2019.

2.) It was explained in the application form that [NAME] had been previously recognised but that recognition expired on 15 May 2018. The [NAME] had approached Mr [RESPONDENT] in April 2018 for recognition, but the landlord and the managing agent had failed to respond, hence the application to the Tribunal.

3.) It was explained that there are 36 flats in the block. Included with the application were forms signed in respect of 31 flats, but these forms related to the [COMPANY]. On further enquiry [NAME] provided the signatures of leaseholders relating to 29 flats and showing their membership of [NAME].

4.) The Tribunal was provided with a copy of the [NAME] rules dated 2012. It was confirmed that those rules are still extant. On further enquiry, [NAME] explained that the constitution and the list of members are kept up-to-date by the officers and that details of [NAME] are publicised on a public notice board. Communication with the membership is by emails and a WhatsApp group. It was also confirmed that there are no fees charge in relation to membership of the [NAME] and therefore no accounts. All duties are carried out on a voluntary basis and any expenditure that arises is bourne by the officers or supplemented by the membership on a voluntary basis.

5.) There have been no submissions made by or on the behalf of the landlord.

6.) The Tribunal notes that the membership of the [NAME] is over 80% of the qualifying tenants (29 flats out of 36 flats). The Tribunal has also had regard to the issues set out in paragraph 3 of The Tenants’ Associations (provisions Relating to Recognition and Provision of Information) (England) Regulations 2018 and is satisfied that there is adequate provision for those issues. As such the Tribunal gives a certificate recognising the [COMPANY] as a Tenants Association under section 29 of the 1985 Act.

3 The recognition is for a period of five years commencing 13 December 2019 and a copy of the relevant certificate is enclosed with this decision.

Chairman: [NAME]: 12 December 2019

ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME], which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the [NAME] within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

3. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tenants' Association had previously been recognised, but its recognition had expired.
  • The landlord and managing agent failed to respond to the Tenants' Association's request for recognition.
  • The Tenants' Association provided signatures from leaseholders representing 29 out of 36 flats.
  • The Tenants' Association's membership was over 80% of the qualifying tenants.
  • The Tribunal was satisfied that the Tenants' Association had adequate provisions for the issues set out in the relevant regulations.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision granted recognition to a Tenants' Association under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Who was involved?

The Tenants' Association and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to grant recognition because the association met the statutory requirements, including having over 80% of qualifying tenants support the application.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, specifically section 29, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the association's compliance with the statutory requirements, including having over 80% of qualifying tenants support the application.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the Tenants' Association.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their Tenants' Association meets the statutory requirements to seek recognition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included the association's rules, signatures from leaseholders, and confirmation of member communication methods.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving recognition of Tenants' Associations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.