First-tier Tribunal Rejects Application to Discharge Management Order
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal rejected an application to remove a management order from a property. The decision was based on the current conditions not meeting the requirements under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.
⚖️ Legal holding
A property management order cannot be discharged under Section 24(9) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 unless appropriate conditions are met.
📖 What the law says
The appropriate tribunal can appoint a manager to handle the management of certain premises when specific conditions are met. These conditions include breaches of obligations related to the management of the premises, unreasonable service charges, unreasonable variable administration charges, failure to comply with approved codes of practice, or other circumstances deemed just and convenient.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal denied the application to discharge the management order under Section 24(9) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) denied an application to discharge a management order under Section 24(9) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, citing inappropriate conditions for discharge.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/00BL/LVM/2022/0022
Property : [NAME], [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondents : [redacted] [COMPANY] (2) and others
Type of Application : Discharge of management order under Section 24(9) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987
Tribunal Members : Mr [APPELLANT] Mr [NAME] of Decision : 21 July 2023
Decision : The Application is dismissed for the reasons set out in the decision of 3rd May 2023
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
2
1. The Tribunal made an interim decision in this matter setting out the reasons why it considered it inappropriate to grant the Application made by the Applicant to discharge the management order currently in existence relating to [NAME], [ADDRESS].
2. The Tribunal was, however, of the view that the parties should be given an opportunity, if they so desired to consider certain proposals that might lead to progress towards such a discharge. They were set out in paragraph 13 of that decision.
3. No response has been received from any party to those proposals.
4. I such circumstances the Tribunal confirms its decision that in the circumstances it is not appropriate to grant the application for a discharge of the management order.
Tribunal Judge: [NAME] 21 July 2023
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Rejects Leaseholder's Request to Replace Manager
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Denies Right to Buy for Elderly Suitable Dwelling
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Rules on Reasonableness of Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules Mobile Home Site Not Protected Under MH Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Service Charges for Necessary Repairs Allowed by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Application for Manager Appointment
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Dismisses Tenancy Service Charge Challenge
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Tenant's Challenge to Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant's Cost Recovery Claims Rejected by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Denies Right to Buy for Elderly Suitable Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Upholds Pitch Fee Increase Based on RPI
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules Garage Block Not Appurtenant Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal confirmed its decision that discharging the management order was not appropriate.
- The tribunal had previously made an interim decision explaining why the application to discharge the management order was inappropriate.
- No party responded to the tribunal's proposals that could have led to progress towards discharging the order.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The application to discharge the management order was denied.
Who was involved?
The claimant and multiple respondents were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the conditions for discharging the management order were not met.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, specifically section 24(9), was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that the conditions for discharge were not met was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also face difficulties if the conditions for discharge are not met.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The judgment does not specify particular evidence or documents that were critical.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can often be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is generally advisable to seek legal advice from a solicitor for cases involving complex legal issues.