VadeLab
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Rejects Tenant's Late Application for Rent Determination

Case No.

📌 In brief

A tenant tried to challenge their new rent but submitted their application too late. The First-tier Tribunal ruled that they could not consider the application since it was received after the new rent started.

⚖️ Legal holding

The Tribunal cannot consider an application for rent determination if the full application is received after the start date of the new rent.

Topics

tenancy disputeslate applications

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section of the Housing Act 1988 outlines the process for landlords to propose increases in rent for assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It specifies that a landlord can serve a notice proposing a new rent which must take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy, starting at least two months after the notice is served.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to determine the application due to the late submission of the landlord's notice.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal rejected a tenant's application for rent determination because the full application was submitted after the start date of the new rent, as per section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2014

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AT/MNR/2019/0030 Property : 1 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] Representative : None Respondent : [redacted] Representative : None Type of Application : Decision in relation to Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal : [NAME] of Decision : 10 July 2019

DECISION

Decision: The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine this application for the reasons stated below. Law, Facts Found and Reasons:

1. The Tribunal received an application dated 8 March 2019, made under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 on 12 March 2019.

2. Section 13(4) provides that “Where a notice is served under subsection a new rent specified in the notice shall take effect as mentioned in the

2 notice unless before the beginning of the new period specified in the notice – (a) the tenant by the application in the prescribed form refers the notice to the appropriate tribunal;…” 3. Although the tenant provided an application in the prescribed form no copy of the landlord’s notice was included. The tenant’s attention was drawn to this omission, but no copy of the landlords notice was received by the Tribunal before the effective date in that notice which was 1 April 2019.

4. The Tribunal has subsequently been provided with a copy of the landlord’s notice, by the tenant, but it was received after the effective date in that notice. Decision 5. The Tribunal considered the papers before it on 7 June 2019. The Housing Act 1988 does not however allow for the Tribunal to consider the matter if the full application was received after the start date of the new rent, nor does it provide for the Tribunal to exercise any discretion in accepting a late application from the tenant. The effective start date of the new rent had already passed.

6. For this reason the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to make a determination of the rent under this application.

Name: [NAME]: 8 July 2019

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such

3 reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal received the full application after the new rent's start date.
  • The law does not allow the Tribunal to use its discretion for late applications.
  • The effective start date for the new rent had already passed.
  • The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to determine the rent application for this reason.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided it lacked jurisdiction to determine the application because it was submitted late.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided it could not consider the application because it was submitted after the new rent began.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was that the application was submitted after the new rent began.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their application is submitted before the new rent begins.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The date the application was submitted was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.