VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent After Landlord Improvements

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property after the landlord made improvements. The decision was made on 31 July 2023 by Mr a person and a person.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent adjustment when the landlord has made significant improvements to the property.

Topics

fair rentlandlord improvementstenancy agreement

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering recent improvements made by the landlord.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal set a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977, considering recent improvements made by the landlord. The decision was made on 31 July 2023 by Mr Duncan Jagger, MRICS, and Mr O Miller, BSc.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AG/F77/2023/0114

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 44 Cricklewood Broadway, London, [POSTCODE]

Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT] c/o [NAME]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is 312.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 31 July 2023

3. The amount for services is

Per

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

0.00 Per

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 do not apply because of 15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because of the 15% exemption as a result of the works carried out by the landlord.

[NAME] of decision 31 July 2023

FR24

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was set at £312.00 per week, excluding water rates and council tax.
  • The rent registration was not limited by the 1999 Order due to a 15% exemption.
  • The 15% exemption was granted because the landlord carried out works on the property.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a fair rent for a property after the landlord made improvements.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the improvements made by the landlord and set a fair rent accordingly.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the impact of the landlord's improvements on the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the impact of any improvements made by the landlord on their fair rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the improvements made by the landlord was important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.