First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £500 Per Month
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £500 per month for a property, taking into account the property's condition and market value, and adjusting for any tenant-provided fixtures and fittings.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market value, adjusted for any tenant-provided fixtures and fittings.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £500 per month for a property, effective from December 22, 2021.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent of £500 per month for a property, effective from December 22, 2021, after considering the property's condition and market value, and adjusting for any tenant-provided fixtures and fittings.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/21UC/F77/2021/0052
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Judge [NAME]
[APPELLANT]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The fair rent is £500.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 22 December 2021
3. The amount for services is n/a Per n/a
not applicable
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
n/a Per n/a
not applicable
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £542.42 per Calendar Month prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 22 December 2021
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 314.3
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 164.4
X 314.3 Minus Y 164.4 = (A) 149.9
(A) 149.9 Divided by Y 164.4 = (B) 0.9118
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C) 1.9868
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C)
Last registered rent* £3276 per annum Multiplied by (C) = 6508.76 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £6509.00 per annum = £542.42 per Calendar Month
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £542.42 Per Calendar Month
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/21UC/F77/2021/0052 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Landlord : [RESPONDENT] :
[NAME]
Respondent/Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :
Rent Act 1977 (“the Act”) Determination by the First-Tier Tribunal of the fair rent of a property following an objection to the rent registered by the Rent Officer.
Tribunal Members : [NAME] Judge [NAME] of Inspection : None. Determined on papers Date of Decision :
22nd December 2021
DECISION
CHI/21UC/F77/2021/0052
2 Summary of Decision
On 21st December 2021 the Tribunal determined a fair rent of £500 per month with effect from 22nd December 2021.
Background
1. On 20th August 2021 the Landlord’s Agent applied to the Rent Officer for registration of a fair rent of £350 per month for the above property.
2. The rent was previously registered on the 21st September 1998 at £3,276 per annum following a determination by the Rent Officer. This equates to £273 per calendar month.
3. The rent was registered by the Rent Officer on the 30th September 2021 at a figure of £500 per month with effect from the same date.
4. By a letter dated 14th October 2021 the Tenant objected to the rent determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to the First Tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property) formerly a Rent Assessment Committee.
5. The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and of Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.
6. Directions were issued on 26th October 2021 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent on the basis of written representations subject to the parties requesting an oral hearing, and that the Tribunal might seek to view the property on the internet. No request was made by the parties for a hearing.
7. The parties were invited to include photographs and video within their representations if they so wished. Neither party made any representation so the Tribunal could only rely on the original information that had been provided by the parties to the Valuation Office Agency, including the letter of appeal from the Tenant.
The Property 8. Within the papers the property is described as a ground floor flat and is within an original house said to date from 1868, converted/extended some years ago to provide about 20 flats in total.
9. The property is situated within a residential area of Eastbourne about one mile from the seafront/beach. A variety of local shops are within easy reach and there is a good range of all main amenities within Eastbourne.
CHI/21UC/F77/2021/0052
3 10. The internal accommodation includes a Living Room, Bedroom, Kitchen and Bathroom with WC and, as confirmed by Mr [NAME], has central heating and hot water provided within the rent.
Evidence and Representations
11. Within his letter of appeal Mr [NAME] refers to rising dampness at ground level that had caused the floor within the Bedroom to collapse. This has been repaired. He also refers to damaged plasterwork.
12. From the Rent Officer’s calculation sheet the Tribunal understands that no white goods, carpets or curtains are provided by the Landlord, that the Kitchen is unmodernised and that the Tenant has responsibility for internal decoration and minor repairs.
13. The Tribunal had regard to the observations from Mr [NAME] and also relied on its own knowledge and experience of local rental values in determining the rent.
The Law
14. When determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, had regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. It also disregarded the effect of (a) any relevant tenant's improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property.
15. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and
(b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. (These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property).
16. The Tribunal also has to have regard to the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 where applicable. Most objections and determinations of registered rents are now subject to the Order, which limits the amount of rent that can be charged by linking increases to the Retail Price Index. It is the duty of the Property Tribunal to arrive at a fair rent under section 70 of the Act but in addition to calculate the maximum fair rent which can be registered according to the rules of the Order. If that maximum rent is
CHI/21UC/F77/2021/0052
4 below the fair rent calculated as above, then that (maximum) sum must be registered as the fair rent for the subject property.
Valuation
17. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only, with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
18. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal's own general knowledge of market rent levels in the area of Eastbourne, Brighton and surrounding areas of East Sussex. Having done so it concluded that such a likely market rent would be £700 per calendar month.
19. However, the property was not let in a condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore it was first necessary to adjust that hypothetical rent of £700 per month particularly to reflect the condition, the Tenant’s responsibility for internal repair and decoration and the fact that the carpets, curtains and white goods were all provided by the Tenant which would not be the case for an open market assured shorthold tenancy.
20. The Tribunal therefore considered that this required a total deduction of £200 per month made up as follows:
Provision of carpets £20 Provision of curtains £10 Provision of white goods £30 Unmodernised kitchen £75 Rising/penetrating damp £25 Tenants internal repair and decoration £40
____ TOTAL £200
21. The Tribunal did not consider that there was any substantial scarcity element in the area Eastbourne, Brighton and surrounding areas of East Sussex.
Decision
22. Having made the adjustments indicated above the fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal for the purpose of section 70 of the Rent Act 1977 was accordingly £500 per month.
23. The Section 70 Fair Rent determined by the Committee is below the maximum fair rent permitted by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent)
CHI/21UC/F77/2021/0052
5 Order 1999 details of which are shown on the rear of the Decision Notice and accordingly that rent limit has no effect.
24. The Tribunal is aware that this Fair Rent is above the £350 per month requested by the Landlord. The Landlord is not required to charge this higher rent.
Accordingly the sum of £500 per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from the 22nd December 2021, this being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Fair Rent Based on RPI
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenant: Market vs. Maximum Fair Rent
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Tenancy Agreement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets maximum fair rent for tenant's property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent Under Rent Act 1977
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant's rent is adjusted based on the property's condition and market value.
- The tenant's rent is recalculated according to the Retail Price Index and relevant legislation.
- The tenant's rent takes into account any improvements made by the tenant.
- The tenant's rent is determined by considering multiple factors including the property's age, location, and state of repair.
- The tenant's rent is set at the lower of the calculated market rent and the maximum fair rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal set a fair rent of £500 per month for a property.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition, market value, and adjustments for tenant-provided fixtures and fittings.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the adjustment for tenant-provided fixtures and fittings.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and any tenant-provided fixtures and fittings when calculating a fair rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and descriptions of the property's condition were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.
