VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent at £510 Per Week

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £510 per week for a property, taking into account the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the property's condition and market conditions, adjusted for scarcity.

Topics

fair rentrent regulationdisrepair

Provisions

Rent Act 1977Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £510.00 per week, considering the property's condition and scarcity of similar properties.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set a fair rent of £510 per week for a property, considering its condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the locality.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AW/F77/2025/0211

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 44 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

[COMPANY] [NAME] Mr [APPELLANT] & Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £510.00 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 9 September 2025

3. The amount for services is

Per

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

Per

negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is/is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf)/ do not apply because 1st registration/15% exemption.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ per week including £ per for services (variable).

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of 571.50 ........... per week ........... including ............................................ per month ...................... for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 9 September 2025

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 402.9

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 367.2

X 402.9 Minus Y 367.2 = (A) 35.7

(A) 35.7 Divided by Y 367.2 = (B) 0.09722

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.14722

Last registered rent* 498.00 Multiplied by (C) = 571.32 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = 571.50

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £571.50 Per Week

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AW/F77/2025/0211

Property : 44 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT] & Ms [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] [NAME] of Objection : 7 May 2025

Type of Application : Section 70, Rent Act 1977

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Reasons

: 9 September 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The sum of £510.00 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 9 September 2025, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

REASONS

Background

1. The property was previously the subject of a registered rent of £498.00 per week registered on 30 March 2023 and effective from 30 April 2023.

2. Following an application by the landlord the rent was registered on 10 April 2025 and effective from 30 April 2025 at £513.00 per week which was the s70 rent.

3. Following an objection from the Landlord dated 7 May 2025 to the determination of the fair rent by the Rent Officer, the tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the Rent Act 1977.

Inspection

4. The tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

5. The property is described on the rent registration certificate as a first floor self-contained converted flat circa 1919-1944 with central heating and comprising 4 rooms, kitchen, bathroom, WC.

Evidence

6. There were no written submissions from the Landlord.

7. Submissions were made on behalf of the Tenant by [APPELLANT], Solicitors. Mr [APPELLANT] was stated to no longer live at the property. The kitchen is described as being very small and was refitted by the tenant about 15 years ago. The fridge has to go in another room. The submissions suggest that the rent should be fixed at the capped rent.

8. Several comparables were provided;

• Flat A 37 Wallingford Ave is a self contained converted flat with central heating on the ground floor with 2 room, kitchen, bathroom/WC and use of the garden. The tenancy is a secure tenancy from a social housing provider and the rent is a capped rent and below the market rent fixed under s70. The flat is smaller and therefore of little assistance in valuing the subject property.

• First, second and third floor maisonette [ADDRESS] W10 is a self contained converted flat without central heating with bathroom/wc and on small room on the first floor, 1 room and kitchen on the second floor and one room on the third floor. The rent is £235 per week which is the s70 rent and below the rent

3 cap. The layout and lack of central heating make this a poor comparable. The rent fixed below the cap suggests there is disrepair.

• Flat A 32 Wallingford Ave is a self contained ground floor flat without central heating consisting of 3 room, kitchen, bathroom/wc and garden. The rent is a capped rent of £233 per week and below he s70 rent of £350.00 per week. The landlord is a social housing provider. The flat is smaller and lacks central heating and the rent is likely to be below the rental value of the subject property.

• [ADDRESS] W10 is a self contained converted flat without central heating on the first floor consisting of3 rooms, kitchen, bathroom and WC. There is a garden. The registered rent is capped rent and below the uncapped s70 rent of £293 per week. It is smaller than the subject flat and lacks heating and is therefore of limited assistance.

9. There is said to be disrepair at the flat with a broken gas appliance. The fire escape staircase at the rear has been removed and there is no sound insulation between the ground and first floors. Windows do not fit correctly and are draughty. In short this is not a modern flat with modern facilities.

The Law

10. When determining a fair rent in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, the tribunal has regard to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) including the age, location and state of repair of the property.

11. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasized that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for 'scarcity' (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms - other than as to rent - to that of the regulated tenancy) and that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market) rents are usually appropriate comparables. These rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any relevant differences between those comparables and the subject property.

12. The rent has been previously registered, and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 therefore applies unless there are significant improvements made by the Landlord which increase the rent which would be registered by more than 15%. There are no such improvements in this case. The previous registration is therefore the starting point for assessing the new rent under the Order. The Order sets out the basis for

4 calculating the new rent which is the increase in the Retail Prices Index from the last registration date plus 5% where the rent has previously been registered.

Determination and Valuation

13. In addition to the comparable evidence from the tenant, the tribunal has relied on our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area. We consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £750.00 per week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

a. Items of disrepair and condition listed in the tenants submissions

b. The Tribunal found that there was substantial scarcity of letting property in the locality of Greater London and using its knowledge and experience made a deduction of 20% from the adjusted market rent.

14. The full valuation is shown below:

15. The Tribunal determines a rent of £510.00 per week for the purposes of s70.

Decision

16. The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was £510.00 per week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 is calculated at £571.50 per week. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form.

17. The lower figure is to be registered as the fair rent and in this case it is the s70 rent of £510.00 per week which is to be registered as the fair rent for this property.

Chairman: [NAME]: 9 September 2025

Fair rent Per week Market rent 750.00 £ less condition & terms 15% 112.50 -£ adjusted rent 637.50 £ less scarcity off adj rent 20% 127.50 -£ Fair rent 510.00 £

5

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.

If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-application-for- permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber

The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law.

If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The fair rent was set at £510.00 per week, effective from the decision date.
  • The tribunal adjusted the market rent downwards due to the property's condition and specific terms.
  • A 20% deduction was made from the adjusted market rent due to a substantial scarcity of letting properties in Greater London.
  • The uncapped fair rent determined by the Tribunal was lower than the capped rent, so it was registered.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The fair rent for the property was set at £510 per week.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the property's condition and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the property's condition and scarcity of similar properties was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might also seek a fair rent adjustment based on the property's condition and local scarcity.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparative evidence of similar properties and the condition of the property were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving fair rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.