First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Protected Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a protected tenancy, taking into account the current market conditions and the state of the property. The decision was based on the condition of the property, improvements made by the tenant, and the scarcity of similar properties in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent that reflects the current market conditions and the state of the property.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a fair rent for a property based on its condition, improvements, and scarcity in the local market.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a protected tenancy based on the current market conditions and the state of the property, adjusting for improvements and scarcity.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AF/F77/2021/0277
Notice of the Tribunal Decision
Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 42A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME](Hons) LLM Property Law MA
Landlord The [APPELLANT]
Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT]
1. The fair rent is 152.50 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)
2. The effective date is 29 November 2021
3. The amount for services is N/A Per
4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is
N/A Per
5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.
6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).
7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry
8. For information only:
(a) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the below the maximum fair rent of £155.50 per Week prescribed by the Order.
[NAME] of decision 29 November 2021
FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION
LATEST RPI FIGURE X 312.0
PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 239.9
X 312.0 Minus Y 239.9 = (A) 72.1
(A) 72.1 Divided by Y 239.9 = (B) 0.3005418924
First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO
If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)
If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1.350541
Last registered rent* £115.00 Multiplied by (C) = 1.350541 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)
Rounded up to nearest 50p = £155.50
Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services
MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £155.50 Per Week
Explanatory Note
1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.
2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:
(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and
(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).
A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).
The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.
3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.
4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.
Case Reference
: LON/OOAF/F77/2021/0277
Property : 42A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [COMPANY] of Application : Determination of a Fair Rent under section 70 of the Rent Act 1977
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] : P-Paper (paper, video, audio)
Date of Decision : 29th November 2021
Date of Statement of Reasons : 29th November 2021
_______________________________________________
Statement of Reasons
____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
Background The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 29th November 2021 of £ 152.50 per week with effect from the same. On the 6th August 2021 the Landlord of the property applied to the Rent Officer for re registration of a fair rent of £523 per month, the rent having been previously registered on 29th February 2012 at £115.00 per week. On the 30th September 2021, the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £152.50 per week with effect from 30th September 2021. In a letter received by the Rent Officer on the 11th October 2021 the Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] objected to the rent determined by the Rent Officer and the matter was referred to the First –tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (Residential Property). Directions were issued by the Tribunal on the 13th October 2021. In those Directions, the parties were informed that in accordance with Public Health England’s advice to avoid unnecessary travel and social interaction for the time being, the Tribunal would not hold an oral hearing, unless so requested by either or both the parties, or would it inspect the property. Neither party has requested a hearing. Thereafter, the Directions made provision for the filing with the Tribunal of the parties’ respective written submissions and, in particular, for the completion of a reply form giving details of the Property and including any further comments the parties wished the Tribunal to take into account in making its determination. In due course, the Landlord and the Tenant filed their written submissions. The tenancy is a statutory (protected) periodic tenancy. The tenancy (not being for a fixed tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 which sets out the landlords statutory repairing obligations; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations. Following the issue of the Tribunals decision which was based on the written and visual evidence submitted by the parties that was germane to the determination of a fair rent, the landlord sought extended reasons for the Tribunal’s decision. The Property The property is a, centrally heated, flat comprising, two bedrooms, one living room, which a proportion is divided off by hardboard to produce a separate area used as a third bedroom, a kitchen and bathroom. The submissions and tenants reply form undated notes, notes heating, and replacement windows installed by landlord. The tenant installed the kitchen and a new WC in bathroom. Ceramic floors in kitchen, bathroom, and WC have been installed by tenant with additional laminate flooring. Relevant Law Provisions in respect of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the determination of a fair rent are found in Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1) to the Rent Act 1977, as
amended by paragraph 34 of the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013, and section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9 (as amended) “Outcome of determination of fair rent by appropriate tribunal 9.-(1) The appropriate tribunal shall- (a) if it appears to them that the rent registered or confirmed by the rent officer is a fair rent, confirm that rent; (b) if it does not appear to them that that rent is a fair rent, determine a fair rent for the dwelling house.” Section 70: Determination of fair rent (as amended) “(1) In determining, for the purposes of the Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to- (a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, … (b) if any furniture is provided for the use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture [, and (c) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy.] (2) For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.
(3) There shall be disregarded- (a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his to comply with any terms thereof; (b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his; (c), (d) …[repealed] (e) if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the
condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub-tenant of his.”
Consequently, when determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the Property. It also disregards the effect of (a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and (b) the effect of any disrepair or defect attributed to the Tenant of any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the Property. In [COMPANY] v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and [NAME] v [NAME] [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised:
(a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on terms- other than as to rent- to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (The rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any differences between the comparables and the subject property).
In considering scarcity under section 70 (2), the Tribunal recognises that: (a) there are considerable variations in the level of a scarcity in different parts of the country and that there is no general guidance or “rule of thumb” to indicate what adjustments should be made; the Tribunal, therefore, considers the case on its merits; (b) terms relating to rents are to be excluded. A lack of demand at a particular rent is not necessarily evidence of scarcity; it may be evidence that the prospective tenants are not prepared to pay that particular rent.
Fair rents are subject to a capping procedure under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which limits increases by a formula based on the proportional increase in the Retail Price Index since last registration. The only exception to this restriction on a fair rent is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent. Submissions
Landlord None received Tenant The tenant notes in an undated reply form the condition and improvements made to the property. Additionally noted is delay in obtaining repairs when requested. Reasons for Decision Initially the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. In the absence of any material evidence as to the market, the Tribunal acting in its capacity as an expert tribunal and using its general knowledge of market levels in the area, concluded that such a likely market rent, if a market rent is adopted would be £253.84 per week. However, the Property is not in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the above hypothetical rent of £253.84 per week, a deduction of 10% is made. In addition, the Tribunal determined that there should be a further deduction of 10% to reflect the fact the Tenant provided the floor coverings, curtains and white goods and is responsible for internal decorating. Thereafter the Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977. A figure of 20% was adopted. The rent after this final adjustment was £152.30 per week say £152.50 per week.
Market rent £253.84 per week Less 10% for condition / tenant's improvements £25.38 pw Less 10% for tenancy terms, carpets and curtains, white goods supplied by tenant £25.38 pw
Less 20% scarcity £50.76 pw Total = £152.30 say £152.50 per week Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 The rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999 because it is below the maximum fair rent of £155.50 per week.
Accordingly, the sum of £152.50 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 29th November 2021 being the date of the Tribunal’s decision.
Valuer Chair: [NAME]: 29th November 2021
Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property at £192.69 Weekly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent for Tenancy Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Regulated Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets fair rent for listed rural cottage
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Condition and S…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for London Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The fair rent was determined to be £152.50 per week.
- The Tribunal used its general knowledge of market levels in the area to estimate a market rent.
- A 10% deduction was applied to the hypothetical market rent due to the property's condition not being typical for a modern letting.
- An additional 10% deduction was made because the tenant provided floor coverings, curtains, white goods, and is responsible for internal decorating.
- A 20% deduction was applied for scarcity, as required by section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977.
- The determined fair rent was below the maximum fair rent allowed by the 1999 Order, so the capping provisions did not limit it.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal determined a fair rent for a protected tenancy based on the current market conditions and the state of the property.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord in a protected tenancy.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the current market conditions, the state of the property, and adjustments for improvements and scarcity.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the improvements made by the tenant.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the current market conditions, the state of their property, and any improvements they have made.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence regarding the condition of the property and any improvements made by the tenant mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
