VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £7320 Under Rent Act 1977

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a semi-detached bungalow, setting it at £7320 per year. This decision was made under the Rent Act 1977, ensuring the rent is fair and reasonable.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.

Topics

fair rentRent Act 1977tenancy agreement

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal sets a fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set a fair rent of £7320 per annum for a semi-detached bungalow, excluding water rates and council tax but including fuel charges, under the Rent Act 1977.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/32UG/F77/2023/0003

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 1 [NAME], [POSTCODE]

Tribunal Judge [NAME] Tribunal Member P Mountain

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr & Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £7320.00 Per annum (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 28 March 2023

3. The amount for services is N/A Per N/.A

/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

N/A Per N/A

not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 apply (please see calculation overleaf).

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

Semi detached bungalow converted from a stable block in circa 1950 comprising 3 bedrooms, kitchen, pantry, hall, wc and two reception rooms, large gardens.

8. For information only:

The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is below the maximum fair rent of £9,341.00 per annum prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 28 March 2023

FR24 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X 360.3

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y 292.2

X 360.3 Minus Y 292.2 = (A) 68.1

(A) 68.1 Divided by Y 292.2 = (B) 0.23305955

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C) 1,28305955

Last registered rent* £7280 Multiplied by (C) = 9340.67 *(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p = £9341.00

Variable service charge NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £9341.00 Per annum

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The decision set a fair rent of £7320 per annum for a semi-detached bungalow.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court used the Rent Act 1977 to calculate a fair rent, considering factors like the property's condition and location.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and its Schedule 11 were applied to determine the fair rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the calculation method for determining a fair rent under the Rent Act 1977.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent as requested.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a fair rent determination under the Rent Act 1977 if they believe their rent is unfair.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included details about the property and its rental history.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to consult a solicitor for legal advice on such matters.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.