VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Enfranchisement Price

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided that the tenant can buy the freehold for £40 from the landlord, following a valuation under the Leasehold Reform Act. The decision was made without inspecting the property and relied on an expert's report.

⚖️ Legal holding

A freeholder must pay an enfranchised tenant £40 for the freehold interest in their property under s.9(1) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

Topics

Leasehold ReformEnfranchisement

Provisions

Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s.27(5)Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s.9(1)

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the price for enfranchisement of a leasehold property based on expert valuation.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the total price to be paid for the freehold interest in a leasehold property under s.9(1) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, based on an expert valuation report, setting it at £40.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference : MAN/00CG/OAF/2025/0010

Property : 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

:

[NAME]

Respondents : [redacted]

Representative : N/A

Type of Application : Section 27(5) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967

Tribunal : Judge A Davies J A Platt FRICS

Date of Decision : 29 April 2026

DECISION

The Tribunal determines that the total price to be paid for the freehold interest in 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] is £40.00.

REASONS

1. By an Order of District Judge Lightman sitting at the County Court at Central London dated 24 March 2025, the application to the Tribunal is for

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026

a determination of the appropriate sum to be paid into court under section 27(5) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

2. The Tribunal made directions on 18 February 2026 indicating that, as the Applicant had already consented to a paper determination, the application would be dealt with on the papers and without an inspection of the Property. The matter is therefore determined in accordance with Rule 31 of the Tribunal’s Procedural Rules.

3. Directions also required the submission of a bundle to include a Valuer’s expert report complying with certain requirements. The bundle contains an expert valuation report from [NAME] dated 27 February 2026 in which he values the premium at £40.

4. The Tribunal has not inspected the property.

5. Mr [NAME] report describes the property as having been originally built as a three-bedroom end of terrace house over three storeys. The original layout of the property being:

Ground Floor – Entrance Hall leading to Living Room, Dining Room and offshot Kitchen.

First Floor – Landing leading to Master Bedroom, 2nd Bedroom and Family Bathroom.

Attic – Bedroom 3.

6. In 2000, planning consent was granted to convert the property into two flats, the first floor and attic becoming a two bedroom flat accessed from the front with the ground floor becoming a one bedroom flat accessed from the rear of the building.

7. The property was let under a lease dated 12 September 1898 for a term of 800 years from 25 March 1898 at a ground rent of £8. 4s. 10d pa. By virtue of a Deed of Assignment dated 2 October 1950 a rent of £2.75 pa was apportioned to the subject property.

8. The correct basis of valuation is under s.9(1) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, because the tenancy of the house and premises is within the financial limits specified under s.1(1)(a), 1(5) and 1(6) and is at a low rent within s.4(1) of the Act.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026

9. S.9(1) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, provides that the enfranchisement price is the aggregate of:

Stage 1 – the value of the existing lease ground rent Stage 2 – the value of the modern ground rent and Stage 3 – the value of the freeholder’s reversion at the expiry of the extended lease.

10. At the date of the vesting order (24 March 2025), the unexpired term of the lease was approximately 673 years. Consequently, the only valuation consideration is the correct capitalisation rate to be applied to the apportioned fixed annual ground rent of £2.75.

11. In his valuation calculation Mr [NAME] capitalizes the rent at 7% arriving at £40. The reversion to freehold in possession being some 673 years distant he values at nil.

Valuation

12. The Tribunal accepts Mr [NAME] valuation which is shown below:

Stage 1 -Term Ground Rent Reserved £2.75 x YP 673 years @ 7% 14.29 Value of Term

£39.30

Stage 2 – Value of 50 year extension

Nil

Stage 3 – Reversion to Full Market Value Nil

Total Value - £39.30 – say

£40.00 (forty pounds)

13. The Tribunal therefore determines that the total price to be paid for the freehold interest in 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] is £40.00.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal accepted the expert's valuation report which calculated the premium at £40.
  • The property's lease had an unexpired term of approximately 673 years, making the ground rent capitalization the only valuation consideration.
  • The expert's valuation capitalized the ground rent at 7%, resulting in a value of £39.30, rounded to £40.
  • The tribunal determined that the value of the freeholder's reversion at the expiry of the extended lease was nil due to the long unexpired term.
  • The property's tenancy fell within the financial limits and low rent criteria of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, making s.9(1) the correct valuation basis.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the price at £40 for enfranchising a leasehold property.

Who was involved?

A tenant seeking to buy their freehold from a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

Based on an expert valuation report under s.9(1) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Leasehold Reform Act 1967 sections 27(5) and 9(1).

What was the argument that mattered most?

The expert valuation report setting the price at £40.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

For the tenant, allowing them to buy the freehold for £40.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

They can use the same valuation method to determine their enfranchisement price.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The expert's valuation report and lease details.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, but only if new evidence is available or legal errors were made.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek professional advice from a qualified solicitor.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.