First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,650 for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided that the fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy should be £1,650 per month, resolving a dispute between the landlord and tenant over a proposed rent increase.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent under an assured tenancy, as determined by the Tribunal based on comparable properties in the area.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. If a landlord gives a notice of rent increase under Sections 13(2) or 13A(2), the tenant can also apply to the tribunal to challenge the proposed new rent. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the terms of the existing tenancy and disregarding certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance with tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a monthly rent of £1,650 for an assured tenancy in North Elham, Kent.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,650 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, following a notice of rent increase by the landlord under the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0002
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Pear Tree Farm Stables, North Elham, Elham, Canterbury, Kent, [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Ms [RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1650.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 06 January 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 06June 2020
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises Detached single storey barn conversion with gardens and paddock approaching 1 acre in total.
[NAME] of Decision 19 February 2021
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0002 Property :
Pear Tree Farm Stables North Elham Elham Canterbury Kent [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted] : None
Respondent : [redacted] : None Type of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Decided on the papers
Date of Decision
:
19th February 2021
DECISION
CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0002 2
Summary of Decision
1. On 19th February 2021 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,650 per month to take effect from 6th January 2021.
Background
2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. The Tenant first took occupation under an Assured Shorthold Tenancy on 6th June 2020 with a rent of £1,600 per month.
4. On 1st December 2020 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,750 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,600 per month. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
5. On 19th December 2020 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988. The Coronvirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and of Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.
6. The Tribunal office informed the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations subject to an objection from either party and that the parties could submit photographs or video evidence in support of their claim. The Tribunal may also inspect the property via the internet.
7. No such objection was received. A Tribunal was arranged for 19th February 2021.
8. Both parties submitted papers to the Tribunal which had been copied to the other party. These submissions included a wide range of comparable properties available to let within the general area.
The Property and Submissions
9. The property comprises a detached single storey barn conversion with brick, stone and timber clad elevations under a pitched slate roof. It is situated in a rural position a short distance from the village of Elham within the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, between Canterbury and Folkestone.
10. The accommodation includes a combined Lounge/Kitchen/Dining Area, three Bedrooms, two Bathrooms and a further room converted from a garage that is accessed through one of the bedrooms and contains the boiler and washing machine. Outside there is off-road parking for
CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0002 3 several vehicles, a garden and a paddock, the whole comprising nearly one acre.
11. Central heating is oil-fired, drainage is to a Septic Tank. Windows are double glazed. Floor coverings/finishes and various curtains, blinds and white goods are all included as per the Inventory submitted.
12. Both parties submitted details of their dealings as Landlord and Tenant over the previous months, particularly referring to the possible purchase of the property by Ms [APPELLANT].
13. [NAME] informed the Tribunal that the property had been let previously at a rent of £1,650 per month and had stated within correspondence that she was prepared to accept a new rent of £1,700.
The Law
S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific
CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0002 4 improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
Consideration and Valuation
14. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted, without an inspection or oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
15. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue, nor is the relationship between Landlord and Tenant.
16. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Kent the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property, if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting, would be £1,650 per month.
17. The property is let with appropriate floor coverings, curtains, blinds and white goods included, and the Tenant has not carried out any improvements that would merit a reduction in this market rent.
CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0002 5 Determination
18. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,650 per month.
19. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,650 per month should take effect from 6th January 2021 this being the date specified within the original notice.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £650/month rent for assured tenancy in Kingsbridge
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition and Tenant Imp…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £1,400 Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy in Dover
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £750/month Rent for Assured Tenancy in Salisbury
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Necessary Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets £750/month Rent for Assured Tenancy in Dawlish
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £950/month rent for assured tenancy in West Molesey
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £1650/month rent for assured tenancy in East Sussex
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £815/month rent for assured tenancy in Poole
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on the property's condition.
- The tenant can request a rent adjustment due to necessary repairs in the property.
- The tenant's improvements to the property can influence the fair market rent determination.
- The case is heard and decided by a First-tier Tribunal based on written representations.
- The tenant can refer a landlord's rent increase notice to the Tribunal for review.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The rent must be assessed against the open market value without considering the tenant's improvements.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a market rent of £1,650 per month for the assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The landlord and tenant were involved in a dispute over the rent increase.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable properties and the terms of the tenancy agreement.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument centered around the fair market value of the property based on comparable rentals.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may benefit from a fair market rent assessment if they disagree with a proposed rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included details of comparable properties and the terms of the tenancy agreement.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
