First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £2000 per Quarter
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a property, setting it at £2000 per quarter. They considered the property's condition, location, and similar properties in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
The market rent for a property should be determined based on its condition, location, and comparables in the area.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent, considering the conditions where the tenancy is a periodic one with the same periods as the original tenancy, starts at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice, and has the same terms except for the rent amount.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the market rent for a property at £2000 per quarter, considering its condition and location.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a property at £2000 per quarter, taking into account the property's condition, location, and comparables in the area.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
Case Reference : CAM/38UE/MNR/2020/0030
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : 1 [RESPONDENT] Wantage [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : [NAME] (managing agent)
Date of [NAME] : 9 November 2020
Type of [NAME] : Determination of the market rent under Section 14 Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 25 January 2021 Determination
remote hearing on the papers.
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
The market rent as at 1 December 2020 is £2000 per quarter.
This has been a remote hearing on the papers which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was, P:PAPERREMOTE. A face to face hearing was not held because no one requested the same, it was not practicable and all the issues could be determined on the papers. The documents that I was referred to are in a bundle of 50 pages the contents of which I have recorded.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 Background
1. On 9 November 2020 the tenant of the above house referred to the Tribunal a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
2. The landlord's notice, which proposed a rent of £2750 per quarter with effect from 1 December 2020, is dated 23 October 2020.
3. The tenancy is a periodic tenancy by succession which commenced in 1997.
4. Owing to the Covid 19 restrictions the parties were asked if they would consent to the [NAME] being dealt with on the paper. Both parties consented and sent written representations.
The Evidence
5. The tenant stated that other than the structural repairs carried out in 2020 no work other than minor matters had been undertaken to the house since double glazing was installed in the 1990s.
6. The accommodation comprises a living room and kitchen on the ground floor and three bedrooms and a bathroom/wc on the first floor. There is a [NAME] in the kitchen. He supplied photographs showing cracked plasterwork and torn wallpaper adjacent to cracking: indicating some movement, the location of this defect is not stated.
7. The landlord’s agent confirmed that the accommodation is as described by the tenant in terms of rooms, although the sizes of each room have not been verified. She added that the house has the benefit of a private garden and provided a plan showing the house and garden edged in red.
8. Since the last rent review, which was effective from 29 September 2019, the landlord carried out works to the roof, fascia and gutters and installed a heater in the bathroom. Redecoration of the bathroom ceiling, two bedrooms, the stairwell, landing and hallway following water ingress were outstanding but are scheduled to be undertaken early in 2021.
9. She referred two lettings of two 3 bedroomed semi detached houses in Wantage situated in rural locations which had been let in September 2020 at £950 and £1100 per month. In addition 2 [RESPONDENT], a mid terrace property, smaller than the subject with a smaller garden is let on an [NAME] at £900 per month.
The Accommodation
10. The Tribunal viewed the locality on Streetview. The property is situated in a rural area in the centre of West Hendred approximately three miles east of Wantage. 11. The accommodation is unmodernised and [NAME] good works post water ingress and roof repairs remains outstanding as stated by the landlord’s agent. The law
12. In accordance with the terms of section 14 Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably
3 be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
13. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(1), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act.
Valuation
14. In coming to its decision, I have relied on the comparable market rental evidence supplied by the landlord and my own general knowledge of rental levels in near Wantage.
15. The house is not in the condition usually found in houses let on the open market under an [NAME] where modernised kitchens and bathrooms and central heating are considered the norm, often with white goods being supplied by the landlord. In determining the rental value of the subject property, the Tribunal has taken into account the terms of the tenancy and the condition of the property including the outstanding work.
The decision
16. The Tribunal concluded that the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in its current condition on the open market is £2000 per quarter. 17. The Tribunal determines the rent at £2000 per quarter with effect from 1 December 2020 in accordance with the landlord’s notice.
Chairman: [NAME]: 25 January 2021
__________________________________
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
ii. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
iii. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such
4 reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
iv. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
Appendix Housing Act 1988
14 Determination of rent by rent assessment committee. (1)Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d )in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In [NAME] a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and
5 (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3)For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. (4)In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling- house concerned or are payable under separate agreements….
6
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Furnished Terraced House
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Property in Hatfield
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent Based on Open Market Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Semi-Detached Bungalow
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1000
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent for Property Set at £700 by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Comparables
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined the market rent based on comparable properties and its knowledge of local rental levels.
- The property's unmodernised condition and outstanding repairs were considered in setting the rent.
- The Tribunal viewed the property's rural location on Streetview to understand its setting.
- The Tribunal disregarded any increase in value from tenant improvements when determining the rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed rent of £2750 per quarter was not accepted by the Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the market rent for a property at £2000 per quarter.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition, location, and comparables in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition and location of the property were the most important factors.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition and location of their property when requesting a rent review.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property and comparable rental data were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, the decision can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
