VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent Based on Recent Trends

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a property by considering comparable evidence and recent rental trends, taking into account the condition of the property and its amenities.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the current market conditions and the state of the property.

Topics

rent determinationcomparable evidenceproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, tenants can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers the open market conditions and disregards certain factors such as the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant, increases in the value due to improvements made by the tenant, and reductions due to the tenant's non-compliance with tenancy terms.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal determined the market rent for a property based on comparable evidence and recent rental trends.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for a property based on comparable evidence and recent rental trends, adjusting for the condition of the property and amenities.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AQ/MNR/2021/0024

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 44 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr [NAME] [NAME]

Landlord Mrs [RESPONDENT] [NAME] c/o [RESPONDENT] [COMPANY], 350 [NAME], Harrow, Middlesex, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1360 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 21 November 2020

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable 0

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 21/10/2010

6. Length of the term or rental period monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord full repairing

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A semi detached house with 3 bedrooms 2 reception rooms kitchen bathroom and WC, front and rear gardens and garage

[NAME] of Decision 21 July 2021

MR22

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference :

LON/00AQ/MNR/2021/0024 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) :

P: PAPERREMOTE

Property : 44 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Ms [COUNSEL] [NAME] : In Person Respondent Landlord : Mrs [COUNSEL] [NAME] : [COUNSEL] [COMPANY] of application : Market Rent under s13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) :

Mr [NAME] [NAME] and venue of hearing : 21 July 2021 at 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 21 July 2021

DECISION

MR22

Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote hearing on the papers. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. The Directions dated 24 May 2021 set out that the tribunal was not able to hold face to face hearings or carry out internal inspections. The decision made is described at the end of these reasons. The documents that the tribunal was referred to are the notice of increase, the application and covering correspondence and submissions from both parties, the contents of which the tribunal have noted.

Decisions of the tribunal (1) The tribunal determines that the market rent is £1360.00 (one thousand three hundred and sixty pounds) per calendar month. (2) The tribunal makes the determinations as set out under the various headings in this decision. The application 1. The applicant seeks a determination pursuant to section 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 following the service of a notice by the landlord proposing a rent increase to £1810.00 per month. Background 2. On 8 October 2020 the landlord served a notice of rent increase proposing a new rent of 1810.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £1750 per month. The starting date for the new rent would be 21 November 2020.

3. On 15 September 2020 the tenant, Mrs [APPELLANT] appealed to the tribunal. Directions were issued on 24 May 2021.

4. An inspection was not possible on this occasion and the tribunal relied on the evidence provided both parties. The tenant helpfully supplied some photographs showing some internal disrepair. The property 5. The property has not been inspected for the purpose of these proceedings but the parties have supplied plans and photographs between them in which the tribunal can rely.

6. The property is in a mainly residential locality adjacent to public open space. Public transport is within easy reach. Accommodation consists of 2 living rooms, 3 bedrooms kitchen and bathroom/WC. The house has a garage and central heating. The landlord’s evidence

MR22 7. The Landlord in his reply form provided a description of the accommodation, a photograph of the front elevation and a floor plan.

8. No rental evidence was put forward.

9. No comment was made on the tenant’s allegations of disrepair. The tenant’s evidence 10. In the reply form the Tenant confirms that kitchen was replaced by the tenant.

11. The tenant stated that the boiler was broken at the time of the application but there is no evidence as to whether this has been repaired. Photographs of been provided of worn carpets on the stairs poor decorations in various places and some mould and water damage. Bathroom tiles are coming away from the wall which allows dampness behind the tiles and into the floor below. Fencing and the side gate are in need of repair. External decorations are poor.

12. The tenant has supplied details of comparable evidence taken from Rightmove. • [ADDRESS], Harrow a similar age three-bedroom terrace house consisting of 3 bedrooms bathroom and 2 reception rooms to rent at £1525 per month. There is no garage • a modern semi-detached property in North Harrow to let at £1550 per month and consisting of 3 bedrooms. The house is available to let unfurnished and was added to right move on 14 June 2021. • [ADDRESS], Harrow a Semi Detached Property with 3 Bedrooms Available to Let Unfurnished at £1550 per Month. This Property Was Added to Right Move on 23 June 2021. • [NAME], a three-bedroom semi-detached house available to let in July 2021 at £1650 per month. This is a three-bedroom house with garage.

13. In the Tenants view the market for newly refurbished houses in the area is £1500- £1700 per month.

The Law 14. The tribunal must first determine that the landlord’s notice under section 13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served. 15. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires the tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

MR22 16. In so doing the tribunal, is required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act. Any improvements made during the previous regulated tenancy are no longer disregarded. Valuation 17. The Tenant has put forward for comparable properties which the tribunal considers are relevant. The tribunal notes these are houses to let in the condition in which the market would expect.

18. In addition to the evidence supplied by the Tenant the tribunal also relies on its own knowledge and experience. The tribunal is of the view that rents have fallen in the London area recently and there is no evidence before the tribunal this trend has stopped or been reversed. The best evidence comes from contemporary lettings in the market.

19. The tribunal considers that the house in good repair and with the amenities required by the market would let at a rent of £1600.00 per month. The tribunal has then considered the condition of the house and lack of white goods and makes an adjustment of 15% for these factors which reduces the rent to £1360 per month. Effective date 20. Under s14 (7) of the Housing Act 1988 the effective date of the decision would normally be the date shown on the application unless there is hardship to the tenant.

21. The tribunal received no evidence of hardship and therefore the effective date of the decision is 21 November 2020.

Name: [NAME] [NAME]: 21 July 2021

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case.

MR22 The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the property's condition.
  • The tenant is entitled to a reduced rent if the property is in disrepair.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent determination reflecting current market conditions.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal set the market rent for a property at £1360 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant appealed the landlord's proposed rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court relied on comparable evidence and recent rental trends to determine the market rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and recent rental trends were crucial in determining the market rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should gather comparable evidence and consider recent rental trends when appealing a rent increase.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the property and comparable rental evidence were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.