VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a market rent for a property based on comparable rentals in the area, adjusting for the condition of the property. The rent was set at £1400.00 per month, effective from 28 January 2024.

⚖️ Legal holding

The Tribunal sets a market rent for a property based on comparable rentals in the area, adjusted for the condition of the property.

Topics

market renttenancy agreementproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent, considering the conditions and terms of the existing tenancy, excluding factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance with tenancy terms.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a market rent for a property based on comparable rentals in the area, adjusting for the condition of the property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent for a property based on comparable rentals in the area, adjusting for the condition of the property. The rent was set at £1400.00 per month, effective from 28 January 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/43UH/MNR/2024/0017

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 4 Laleham Abbey, [ADDRESS], Staines, Surrey, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] c/o [NAME], 146/148 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Miss [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1400.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28 January 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 28 January 2023

5. Length of the term or rental period 12 months

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises First floor one bedroom, one kitchen, one bathroom with bath with shower above, within Grade II * Listed building.

[NAME] of Decision 21 May 2024

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case reference : CHI/43UH/MNR/2024/0017

Property : 4 Laleham Abbey, [ADDRESS], Staines

Upon Thames, Surrey, [POSTCODE]

Applicant Tenants : [COUNSEL] –[COUNSEL] : In Person

Respondent Landlord : [COUNSEL] Ly

Representative : [NAME] of application : Determination of a Market Rent

Sections 13 & 14 Housing Act 1988

Tribunal member(s) : [NAME] [NAME] of determination : 21 May 2024

Date of reasons : 21 May 2024

REASONS

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

2

Decision of the Tribunal

On 21 May 2024 the Tribunal determined a Market Rent of £1400.00 per month to take effect from 28 January 2024.

Background

1. By way of an application dated 12 January 2024 received by the Tribunal on 12 January 2024 the Applicant tenant of 4 Laleham Abbey, [ADDRESS], Staines-Upon-Thames [POSTCODE] (hereinafter referred to as “the property”) referred a Notice of Increase in Rent (“the Notice”) by the Respondent landlord of the property under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) to the Tribunal.

2. The Notice, dated 31st October 2023, proposed a new rent of £1,500.00 per month in lieu of a passing rent of £1,300.00 per month, to take effect from 28 January 2024.

3. The property was let to the tenant by way of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy agreement commencing 28 January 2023, for 12 months. A copy of the tenancy agreement was provided.

4. On 6 February 2024 the Tribunal issued Directions advising the parties that it considered the matter suitable for determination on the papers unless either party objected, in writing, within 7 days. In accord with current Tribunal policy the parties were advised that no inspection would be undertaken unless either party objected. No objections were received.

5. The Directions required the landlord and tenant to submit their completed statements to the Tribunal by 20 February 2024 and 5 March 2024 respectively, with copies to be sent to the other party.

6. Having reviewed the submissions, the Tribunal concluded that the matter remained capable of being determined fairly, justly and efficiently on the papers, consistent with the overriding objective of the Tribunal.

7. These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each point referred to in submissions but concentrate on those issues which, in the Tribunal’s view, are fundamental to the determination.

8. By an application dated 4 March 2024 the Landlord’s Representative, [COUNSEL] of [NAME], requested that evidence submitted by email on the 29th February 2024 should be accepted, because an earlier email had not been received. The Tribunal accepted the evidence. No further reply was received from the Tenant and the Tribunal therefore accepted the Application dated 12 January 2024 together with the various attachments as comprising her case and submissions.

Law 9. In accordance with the terms of Section 14 of the Act, the Tribunal is required to

3

determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market, by a willing landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual Tenancy.

10. In so doing, and in accordance with the Act, the Tribunal ignores any increase in value attributable to tenants’ improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenants’ failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

The Property

11. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but did view external images on publicly available online platforms.

12. The property comprises a converted first floor flat within a substantial Grade II* listed period mansion. The accommodation comprises one bedroom, one living room, a kitchen and a bathroom with shower attachment over the bath. The property had a few items of furniture; umbrella stand, a small TV cabinet, a kitchen bin and some glasses.

Submissions – Tenants

13. The tenant’s submissions, excluding consideration of personal circumstances which are to be disregarded in setting a market rent under the Act, can be summarised as follows.

14. An inventory, 57 pages, of the condition and contents of the property at the point of taking out the assured shorthold tenancy the document is dated 28 January 2023.This is a record of the property both in narrative and photographs.

15. Included in the submission are the details of 55 other properties that are available for letting in the vicinity.

Submissions – Landlord

16. The landlords’ submissions, excluding consideration of personal circumstances which are to be disregarded in setting a market rent, can be summarised as follows.

17. The tenancy agreement plus the original lettings details of the property complied by [NAME], which include a floorplan and some interior and exterior photographs.

18. The Landlord also includes a number of marketing details of other properties in the vicinity available for letting.

Determination

19. The Tribunal has carefully considered all the submissions before it.

20. The Tribunal determines a market rent for a property by reference to rental values generally and, in particular, to the rental values for comparable properties in the locality. The Tribunal has no regard to the current rent and the period of time which that rent has been charged, nor does it take into account the percentage increase which the proposed rent represents to the

4

passing rent. In addition, the legislation makes it clear that the Tribunal is unable to account for the personal circumstances of either the landlord or the tenant.

21. The date at which the Tribunal assesses the rent is the effective date contained within the landlord’s Notice which, in this instance, is the 28 January 2024. The Tribunal disregards any improvements made by the tenants but has regard to the impact on rental value of disrepair which is not due to a failure of the tenant to comply with the terms of the tenancy.

22. In the first instance, the Tribunal determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market, if it were let on the effective date and in the condition that is considered usual for such a market letting.

23. The Tribunal thanks the parties for the submission of rental information. Weighing the parties’ comparable evidence against its own expert knowledge as a specialist Tribunal and having regard to the size, nature and specification of the property. The Tribunal determined that the open market rent of the property in good tenantable condition is £1500.00 per month.

24. Once the hypothetical rent was established it was necessary for the Tribunal to determine whether the property meets the standard of accommodation, repair and amenity of a typical modern letting.

25. The Tribunal finds the condition to be slightly impacted by several minor maintenance issues and deducts £100 per month.

26. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds the adjusted open market rent to be £1400.00 per month.

27. The tenant made no submissions to the Tribunal in regard to delaying the effective date of the revised rent on the ground of undue hardship under section 14(7) of the Act. Accordingly, the rent of £1400.00 per month will take effect from 28 January 2024, that being the date stipulated within the landlord’s notice.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for

5

an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property does not meet the standard of accommodation, repair, and amenity of a typical modern letting.
  • The property is not maintained in good repair and lacks essential facilities.
  • A fair market rent is set based on the property's condition and local comparables.
  • The Tribunal sets a market rent for a property based on comparable properties in the locality, adjusting for the property's condition.
  • A rent reflecting the current condition and market value of the property is set.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a market rent for a property based on comparable rentals in the area, adjusting for the condition of the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable rental values in the area and adjusted for the condition of the property.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of rental values in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may expect their rent to be set based on comparable rental values in the area.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence included rental information from comparable properties in the area.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.