VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Fair Rent of £538 Per Month

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal has set a new fair rent of £538 per month for a property. This decision was made under the Rent Act 1977 and took effect on 23rd August 2023.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.

Topics

fair renttenancy agreementmaximum fair rent

Provisions

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal sets a new fair rent for a property under the Rent Act 1977.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set a new fair rent of £538 per month for a property under the Rent Act 1977. The decision was made on 25th April 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

FR27 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AT/F77/2023/0376

Notice of the Tribunal Decision

Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were A , 29 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Judge [NAME] Tribunal Member [NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The fair rent is £538 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3&4)

2. The effective date is 23rd August 2023

3. The amount for services is N/A Per

negligible/not applicable

4. The amount for fuel charges (excluding heating and lighting of common parts) not counting for rent allowance is

N/A Per

1. negligible/not applicable

5. The rent is not to be registered as variable.

6. The capping provisions of the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 do not apply because 1st registration.

7. Details (other than rent) where different from Rent Register entry

8. For information only:

(a) The fair rent to be registered is the maximum fair rent as prescribed by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. The rent that would otherwise have been registered was £ ....................... per ............................. including £ ................. per .......................... for services (variable).

(b) The fair rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999, because it is the same as/below the maximum fair rent of £ ............... per ................ including £ .................................. per .......................... for services (variable) prescribed by the Order.

[NAME] of decision 25th April 2024

FR27 MAXIMUM FAIR RENT CALCULATION

LATEST RPI FIGURE X

PREVIOUS RPI FIGURE Y

X

Minus Y

= (A)

(A)

Divided by Y

= (B)

First application for re-registration since 1 February 1999 YES/NO

If yes (B) plus 1.075 = (C)

If no (B) plus 1.05 = (C)

Last registered rent*

Multiplied by (C) =

*(exclusive of any variable service charge)

Rounded up to nearest 50p =

Variable service charge YES / NO If YES add amount for services

MAXIMUM FAIR RENT = £ Per

Explanatory Note

1. The calculation of the maximum fair rent, in accordance with the formula contained in the Order, is set out above.

2. In summary, the formula provides for the maximum fair rent to be calculated by:

(a) increasing the previous registered rent by the percentage change in the retail price index (the RPI) since the date of that earlier registration and

(b) adding a further 7.5% (if the present application was the first since 1 February 1999) or 5% (if it is a second or subsequent application since that date).

A 7.5% increase is represented, in the calculation set out above, by the addition of 1.075 to (B) and an increase of 5% is represented by the addition of 1.05 to (B).

The result is rounded up to the nearest 50 pence.

3. For the purposes of the calculation the latest RPI figure (x) is that published in the calendar month immediately before the month in which the Tribunal’s fair rent determination was made.

4. The process differs where the tenancy agreement contains a variable service charge and the rent is to be registered as variable under section 71(4) of the Rent Act 1977. In such a case the variable service charge is removed before applying the formula. When the amount determined by the application of the formula is ascertained the service charge is then added to that sum in order to produce the maximum fair rent.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair rent calculation under the Rent Act 1977.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new fair rent of £538 per month for a property.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Rent Act 1977 and the relevant schedule.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Rent Act 1977 and its schedules were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the calculation of the fair rent under the Rent Act 1977.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair rent determination under the Rent Act 1977.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the tenancy agreement and relevant financial records.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.