VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a new monthly rent of £1,050 for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from 15 September 2024, after considering written submissions from both the tenant and landlord.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this rule, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they pay under an assured tenancy, except if the rent is based on a previous tribunal decision or more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. The tribunal then determines a fair market rent for a periodic tenancy with the same terms as the original tenancy.

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This rule allows landlords to propose increases in rent for assured periodic tenancies through a notice, provided the increase takes effect at least two months after the notice is served. The notice must specify a new period for the tenancy, and the increase is subject to certain conditions regarding the timing of the increase.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on written submissions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new market rent of £1,050 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from 15 September 2024, based on written submissions from both the tenant and landlord.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/45UB/MNR/2024/0144

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 2 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

[RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1050.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15 September 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 15 September 2023

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

8. Description of premises 1 bedroom ground floor flat.

[NAME] of Decision 13 August 2024

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/45UB/MNR/2024/0144 Property : 2 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlord : [RESPONDENT] : None Type of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :

13th August 2024

DECISION

CHI/45UB/MNR/2024/0144

2

Summary of Decision 1. On 13th August 2024 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,050 per month to take effect from 15th September 2024. Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.

3. On 29th May 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,045 per month, in place of the existing rent of £1,000 per month, to take effect from 15th September 2024. The notice complied with the legal requirements.

4. On 5th June 2024 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.

5. The Tribunal does not routinely consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.

6. The Tribunal issued Directions on 5th July 2024 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.

7. Both parties submitted papers by the specified dates setting out their respective case. The papers were also copied to the other party.

8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 13th August 2024 based on the written representations received.

9. These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each and every point referred to either in submissions or during any hearing. However, this does not imply that any points raised, or documents not specifically mentioned were disregarded. If a point or document was referred to in the evidence or submissions that was relevant to a specific issue, then it was considered by the Tribunal. The Tribunal concentrates on those issues which, in its opinion, are fundamental to the application. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal

(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the

CHI/45UB/MNR/2024/0144

3 Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.

(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-

(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.

(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in

CHI/45UB/MNR/2024/0144

4 subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. The Property 10. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a ground floor flat within a modern purpose-built block of similar properties, situated within a residential area close to Lancing beach.

11. The accommodation has gas-fired central heating and double-glazed windows, and comprises a Hall, Living Room, Kitchen, Bedroom and Bathroom. Outside there is a single nominated car space.

12. The Energy Performance Rating is ‘C’. Submissions 13. The initial tenancy began on 15th September 2023 at a rent of £1,000 per month.

14. The Landlord provides a cooker, carpets and blinds, and states that the property was redecorated prior to the tenancy beginning, and provides details of rents of several comparable properties between £735 and £1,100 per month.

15. The Tenant states that several blinds are damaged with missing slats, that the Bathroom fittings are generally dated, the heating system is unreliable and that the kitchen cupboards and under sink cupboard are stained.

16. The Tenant refers to four comparable properties where rents range from £875 to £1,000 per month. Consideration and Valuation 17. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.

18. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.

19. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Lancing and West Sussex, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,100 per month.

20. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets and curtains/blinds to all be provided by the Landlord.

21. Using its experience the Tribunal decided that the full rent should be reduced by £30 per month to reflect the Tenant’s provision of some white goods and £20 per month to reflect the repair and maintenance issues raised.

CHI/45UB/MNR/2024/0144

5 22. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination 23. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,050 per month.

24. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,050 per month should take effect from 15th September 2024, this being the date specified in the notice.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 10 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal could determine the rent based solely on the written submissions from both parties.
  • The market rent for the property, if let today, would be £1,100 per month.
  • The rent was reduced by £30 per month because the tenant provided some white goods.
  • The rent was reduced by £20 per month due to repair and maintenance issues raised by the tenant.
  • The new rent of £1,050 per month should take effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant did not claim that the new rent's starting date would cause undue hardship.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new market rent of £1,050 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on written submissions from both parties, considering the condition of the property and comparable rents.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Sections 13 and 14 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The arguments regarding the condition of the property and comparable rents were most important.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, as the new rent was slightly higher than the landlord's proposal.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should gather evidence of comparable rents and the condition of their property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from both the tenant and landlord detailing the property's condition and comparable rents mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.