VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a new market rent of £950 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, considering factors like the property's condition and local rental values.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Topics

tenancymarket rentassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. This includes considering the property's condition and local rental values.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a new market rent of £950 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and local rental values.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/43UB/MNR/2023/0147

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 950.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 31 May 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 31 December 2017

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

8. Description of premises First floor 2 bedroom flat.

[NAME] of Decision 14 August 2023

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/43UB/MNR/2023/0147 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlord : [RESPONDENT] : [RESPONDENT] of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision : 14th August 2023

DECISION

CHI/43UB/MNR/2023/0147 2

Summary of Decision

1. On 14th August 2023 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £950 per month to take effect from 31st May 2023. Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.

3. On 25th April 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £920 per month in place of the existing rent of £880 per month to take effect from 31st May 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.

4. On 15th May 2023 the Tribunal received an application from the Tenant under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.

5. The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.

6. The Tribunal issued directions on 12th July 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.

7. Both parties submitted papers by the specified dates setting out their respective cases. The papers were also copied to the other party.

8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 14th August 2023 based on the written representations received. The Property 9. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a first floor flat within a 3-storey purpose-built block of flats less than 1 mile from the centre of Molesey.

10. The accommodation includes a Hall, Living Room, Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms, Bathroom, Garage and use of Communal gardens. Submissions 11. The initial tenancy began in about October 2018 which the Tenant says is an Assured Succession Tenancy. The Notice served refers to an Assured Periodic Tenancy. The Tenant says that he succeeded his father at the property.

12. The accommodation has double-glazed windows and night storage heating. Carpets are fitted but the Tenant is responsible for curtains and white goods.

CHI/43UB/MNR/2023/0147 3 13. The Landlord states that the property was refurbished in 2022, which is confirmed by the Tenant, and provides details of several other properties in the block which have been advertised to let at rents from £922 per month to £1,275 per month.

14. The Tenant states that recent decoration has covered over dampness and that the storage heaters and previous secondary glazing was fitted by his father.

15. The Tenant states that the rent should remain at its present level due to lack of maintenance over many years and informs the Tribunal that a [NAME] has been served with a Notice to increase his rent to £1,000 per month, despite that flat also suffering from damp issues.

16. The Tenant informs the Tribunal that he is in receipt of various state benefits and also provided a number of internal photographs of the property which showed the carpets to be worn. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal

(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.

(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and

CHI/43UB/MNR/2023/0147 4 (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-

(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.

(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.

Consideration and Valuation 17. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.

18. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.

19. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in West Molesey the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,175 per month.

20. However, the property is not let on the same terms or in the same condition as a fresh open market letting so the Tribunal needs to make some adjustments to this figure to take account of the variations from such a letting. These adjustments to include the dated kitchen and bathroom fittings.

21. Using its experience the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made: Tenant’s provision of white goods £30 Tenant’s provision of curtains £10

CHI/43UB/MNR/2023/0147 5 Internal damp issues £20 Dated Kitchen £50 Dated Bathroom £15 Worn carpets £50 Tenant’s provision of storage heaters £50

____ TOTAL per month £225

22. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.

23. The Tribunal is aware that this rent is higher than the figure proposed by the Landlord who is not obliged to charge this higher figure. Determination 24. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £950 per month.

25. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £950 per month should take effect from 31st May 2023, this being the date specified in the Notice.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition.
  • The tenant can refer a landlord's rent increase notice to the Tribunal for a fair market rent determination.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment reflecting the need for repairs in the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, taking into account the property's condition and the terms of the tenancy agreement.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • A tenant cannot refer a rent increase notice to the Tribunal if the tenancy agreement excludes such referrals.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new market rent of £950 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and local rental values, ensuring a fair market rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument about the property's condition and local rental values was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may expect a fair market rent based on the property's condition and local rental values.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and descriptions of the property's condition were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.