First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rental Rate After Written Submissions
📌 In brief
A tribunal decided on a new rental rate for an assured periodic tenancy after reviewing documents submitted by both the landlord and the tenant. The decision was made without an oral hearing and took into account factors like property condition and tenant-provided amenities.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have the market rent of their property determined by a First-tier Tribunal based on the open market value and conditions of similar properties in the area, adjusted for any discrepancies in terms or services provided by the tenant.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will determine the open-market rent based on the conditions and terms of similar properties in the area, excluding certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance with tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on written submissions without oral hearing.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent of an assured periodic tenancy based on written submissions from both parties, adjusting for discrepancies in terms and services provided by the tenant.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/29UE/MNR/2023/0186
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 23 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 8 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1000.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 31 July 2023
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 31 January 2021
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
8. Description of premises Pre 1918 terraced house with 2 Living Rooms, 3 bedrooms, 2 Bathrooms, Kitchen, Garden.
[NAME] of Decision 25 September 2023
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/29UE/MNR/2023/0186 Property : 23 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant Tenant : Ms [COUNSEL] :
None
Respondent Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] : None Type of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :
25th September 2023
DECISION
CHI/29UE/MNR/2023/0186
2 Summary of Decision
1. On 25th September 2023 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,000 per month to take effect from 31st July 2023. Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. On 30th June 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,100 per month in place of the existing rent of £795 per month to take effect from 31st July 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
4. On 25th July 2023 the Tribunal received an application from the Tenant under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
5. The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.
6. The Tribunal issued directions on 18th August 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.
7. Both parties submitted papers by the specified dates very clearly setting out their respective cases. The papers were also copied to the other party.
8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 25th September 2023 based on the written representations received. The Property 9. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a period 3-storey flush-fronted terraced house situated in a residential area within Dover. There are local shops within walking distance providing day-to-day requirements and a more extensive array of amenities within the town.
10. The accommodation is listed as including 2 Living Rooms, Kitchen, 3 Bedrooms and 2 Bathrooms. In a floorplan provided the second Living Room is labelled as bedroom 4. Outside there is a rear garden.
11. The property has gas-fired central heating and double glazing. The Energy performance rating is ‘C’.
CHI/29UE/MNR/2023/0186
3 Submissions 12. The Tenant says that the initial tenancy began on 20th January 2020 although the copy of the lease provided says 31st January 2021. Thei initial rent was £795 and has not been increased.
13. The Landlord states that carpets are provided but curtains and white goods are not included. The Landlord also states that the property has been extended and maintained since 2002, that the house is within easy reach of several amenities and refers to asking rents of similar properties above £1,100 per month.
14. The Tenant also states that the Landlord has carried out a number of repairs but there is some unresolved dampness in the Kitchen. The Tenant provided a number of photographs and refers to comparable properties to let for £900 to £1,000 per month. The Law
S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his [NAME], or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his [NAME] being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and
CHI/29UE/MNR/2023/0186
4 (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
Consideration and Valuation
15. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
16. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.
17. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Dover the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,100 per month.
18. In addition, the Tribunal needs to reflect the Tenant’s provision of white goods.
19. Using its experience the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made: Tenant’s provision of white goods £30 Tenant’s provision of curtains £20 General lack of maintenance £50
____
CHI/29UE/MNR/2023/0186
5 TOTAL per month £100
20. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination 21. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,000 per month.
22. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,000 per month should take effect from 31st July 2023, this being the date specified in the notice.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Ground Floor Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £725 Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The market rent for the property was determined to be £1,100 per month based on open market conditions.
- The tenant's provision of white goods reduced the rent by £30 per month.
- The tenant's provision of curtains reduced the rent by £20 per month.
- A general lack of maintenance reduced the rent by £50 per month.
- The Tribunal determined the rent based on written representations as neither party objected to a paper determination.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's initial claim that the tenancy began on 20th January 2020 was not accepted.
- The tenant's claim of unresolved dampness in the kitchen did not lead to a specific separate deduction.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal set a new rental rate of £1,000 per month for the assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
A landlord and a tenant were involved in determining the market rent of their property.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal decided based on written submissions from both parties without an oral hearing, considering factors like comparable rental rates and property condition.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was used to determine the market rent for the assured periodic tenancy.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tribunal considered comparable rental rates and property condition in determining the new rental rate.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The tenant's initial request to lower the rent was not fully granted, as the tribunal set a higher rate than proposed by the landlord but less than initially requested.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rental increase can seek a First-tier Tribunal determination based on written submissions and comparable property data.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs, floor plans, and information about comparable properties were submitted by both parties.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
A person wishing to appeal must seek permission from the First-tier Tribunal within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to consult with a qualified solicitor for advice on similar cases.
