First-tier Tribunal Sets Price for Freehold Acquisition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the price for a tenant to buy the a person of their property. They used the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 to calculate the cost, which came to £1,330.
⚖️ Legal holding
The price of the freehold interest is determined under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal determined the price of the freehold interest based on the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, considering various factors including the entirety value and standing house value.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the price of the freehold interest at £1,330 for a lessee to purchase under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, considering various valuation elements including the entirety value and standing house value.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
Case Reference : BIR/00CR/OAF/2021/0002
Property
: 1 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicants
: [redacted]
: [RESPONDENT].
Respondent: [redacted]
: None
Type of Application : To determine the sum payable into Court by a lessee to purchase
a [NAME] interest pursuant to Section 27 Leasehold Reform Act
1967 by Order of Dudley County Court, 15th December 2020.
Claim No: G00DD349.
Tribunal Members : [NAME]. [NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) [NAME]. FRICS
Date and Venue of : None. Determined by paper submission Hearing
Date of Decision : 5th March 2021
____________________________________________________________
DECISION
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Introduction
1 This is an application to determine the sum payable into Court by Lessees to purchase the
[NAME] interest in 1 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE], pursuant to
Section 27 of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 ('the Act').
2 The Lessees had been unable to locate the Freeholder to serve Notice to acquire the [NAME] and applied to Dudley County Court for a Vesting Order on 29th October 2020 by Claim No: G00DD349. This was granted 15th December 2020 by Deputy District Judge Boynton subject to assessment of the price by the First-tier Tribunal ([NAME]).
The Law
3 There are two interests in the property:
[NAME] by parties [RESPONDENT]. The lease had been granted by [RESPONDENT] and [NAME] to [NAME] for 380 years from 26th April 1712 at a peppercorn
rent.
Leasehold The demise contained a large parcel of land that became vested in Dudley
Metropolitan District Council ('Dudley MBC') under registered title number
WM1030.
Dudley MBC developed the site for housing and assigned part of the demise
comprising the subject house, to [NAME] on 14th March 1983.
The assigned leasehold interest was then transferred to the Applicants
on 21st May 2018.
4 The Applicants are the current leaseholders and wish to acquire the [NAME]. Although their
Solicitors and Search Agents carried out thorough enquiries they were unable to locate the
heirs or assigns of the original Freeholders and applied to Dudley County Court for a Vesting Order under Section 27 of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. The application was made
29th October 2020 which is the valuation date for present purposes.
[ADDRESS] issued the Order on 15th December 2020 subject to the price being determined by the First-tier Tribunal ([NAME]).
6 The Tribunal has considered the facts and assesses the price under section 9(1) of the Act.
Facts Found
7 The Tribunal has been unable to inspect the flat due to Government Covid Regulations and relies on the Submission of the Applicants and their Valuer, [NAME].[NAME].[NAME].
8 According to the Valuation Report the property is a two storey end-terrace house built around 1976. It comprises a living room, kitchen, three bedrooms and bathroom with w.c. The house has been improved by the Lessees since originally built. The house is similar to others on the estate but the site is fully developed and there is no garage or off-road parking.
Issues
[ADDRESS] requires the Tribunal to determine the price of the [NAME] interest. The ground rent is a peppercorn per annum and not in issue.
The price payable under section 9(1) of the Act
10 The Applicants' submissions on each element of the valuation and the Tribunal determinations are as follows:
11 Unexpired Term
Applicant
71.5 years
Tribunal
The Tribunal takes the term from the Land Registry entry and agrees the unexpired term at 71.5 years at the valuation date.
12 Value of Term Ground Rent
Applicant
Nil, peppercorn ground rent.
Tribunal
The Tribunal agrees.
13 Entirety Value of [NAME]
Applicant
£137,500. Mr [APPELLANT] arrived at the figure having considered the reported prices achieved by four other houses in the locality:
[ADDRESS]. August 2020 £150,000
[ADDRESS] 2020 £146,000
[ADDRESS].
May 2020
£142,500
[ADDRESS].
September 2019 £140,000
The comparables all had garages or parking whereas the subject house had neither and to compensate for the difference, Mr [NAME] deducted 5% from the average sale price and rounded to £137,500.
Tribunal
The 'entirety value' is a hypothetical value based on the maximum sale value of a house on the plot, not necessarily the existing house, assuming the plot to be fully developed to its highest potential. It is only relevant as a means of assessing the notional ground rent of the plot for the 50 year lease extension envisaged by section 15 of the Act.
Having considered the evidence the Tribunal agrees the value at £137,500.
14 Site Value as Percentage of Entirety Value
Applicant
32.5% as the subject house is end-terraced.
Tribunal
The Tribunal agrees.
15 Years Purchase
Applicant
5.25% for analysis of both the notional site value to a ground rent and capitalisation
of the ground rent for the notional 50 year lease extension.
Tribunal
The Tribunal agrees.
16 'Standing House' Value of [NAME]
Applicant
£137,500. Mr [APPELLANT] considers the plot fully developed and accordingly the Standing House Value to be the same as the Entirety Value.
Tribunal
The 'standing house' value is the market value of the house currently built on the site, excluding the value of any tenant improvements, assuming the [NAME] is sold with vacant possession.
The Tribunal agrees the plot is already fully developed and determines the Standing House value at £137,500.
17 Tribunal Valuation
Based on these inputs, the Tribunal determines the value as:
Term 1
£ 0
Term 2
Entirety Value
£ 137,500
x plot ratio
0.325
Plot Value
£ 44,687
5.25% return
0.0525
Equivalent rental value per s.15 of the Act
£ 2,346
Years Purchase 50 years 5.25%
17.5728
Present Value 71.5 years 5.25%
0.025770
£ 1,062
Reversion
Standing House Value
£ 137,500
Present Value 121.5 years 5.25%
0.00199
£ 274
£ 1,336
[NAME]
say
£ 1,330
18 Tribunal Determination
The Tribunal determines the price of the [NAME] interest at £1,330 (One Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Pounds).
[NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS Chairman
Date: 5th March 2021
Appeal to the Upper Tribunal
Any appeal against this decision must be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). Prior to making such an appeal the party appealing must apply, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal within 28 days of the date of issue of this decision (or, if applicable, within 28 days of any decision on a review or application to set aside) identifying the decision to which the appeal relates, stating the grounds on which that party intends to rely in the appeal and the result sought by the party making the application.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Premium for Lease Extension
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Interest Price
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Interest Value
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Purchase Price Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Transfer Price Set at £131 by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Transfer Price
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Interest Valuation Under Leasehold Reform Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Interest Valuation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Transfer Price Set at £131 - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent for Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Freehold Purchase Price Determined Under Leasehold Reform Act
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The claimant is entitled to acquire a freehold interest under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
- The Tribunal determines the fair market rent and the appropriate sum for transferring a freehold interest.
- The claimant seeks a fair valuation and purchase price for the freehold interest.
- The claimant's entitlement includes the right to extend their lease under relevant acts.
- The valuation of the freehold interest is based on the leases and ground rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the price at £1,330 for a tenant to buy the freehold of their property.
Who was involved?
A tenant and an unknown freeholder.
How did the court decide, and why?
They used the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 to calculate the price based on the property's value and other factors.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Leasehold Reform Act 1967, specifically sections 27 and 9(1).
What was the argument that mattered most?
The valuation of the property and the calculation of the freehold interest price.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
For the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can use the same process to determine the price of buying their freehold.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The valuation report and the details of the property.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, it can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor.
