VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1,250 Per Month

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided to set the rent for a property at £1,250 per month after considering the property's condition and comparing it to similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the rent for their property set at a reasonable level based on the open market value.

Topics

rent determinationproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the property's condition and similar properties.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for a property at £1,250 per month after considering its condition and comparable properties.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the open market rent for a property to be £1,250 per month, taking into account the property's condition and comparable properties. The decision was made in accordance with the Housing Act 1988, section 14.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00BN/MNR/2024/0074 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 25 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] [NAME] Ms [RESPONDENT] Landlord [NAME] 960 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant Mr & Mrs [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is:£ 1250.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 March 2024 *3. The amount included for services is not applicable 0.00 Per month *4. Service charges are variable and are not included 5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 February 2024 6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly 7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement 8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/K 9. Description of premises Semi-detached house with double glazing and gas central heating. GF: living room, kitchen, bedroom, bathroom. FF: 3 bedrooms, bathroom. Rear garden, driveway to front. Chairman S [NAME] of Decision 22 July 2024

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/00BN/MNR/2024/0074 Property : 25 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenants : [NAME] [RESPONDENT] and Mrs [RESPONDENT] Landlord : Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] of Application : s13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Ms [NAME] of Decision : 22 July 2024 _______________________________________________

DECISION Decision 1. By a decision dated 22 July 2024, the Tribunal determined, in accordance with section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, that the open market rent for the Property is £1,250.00 per month. Background 2. By a notice dated 19 January 2024, (“the Notice”), the Landlord proposed a new rent of £1,275.00 per month to take effect from 1 March 2024.

3. By an application dated 4 February 2024, the Tenant referred the Notice to the Tribunal. Inspection 4. The Tribunal inspected the Property on 22 July 2024.

5. The Property is a two-storey semi-detached house with front driveway/garden and rear garden. The Property is situated on residential street alongside similar properties. A modern housing development, on what was formerly the site of a school, lies opposite the Property. The accommodation comprises: G/F: open plan reception room, kitchen, rear extension providing bedroom with en-suite shower and w/c; 1/F: bathroom, 2 double bedrooms, 1 single bedroom. The Property has double-glazing and gas central heating. © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 6. The Property is let unfurnished. Floor coverings and blinds are provided by the Landlord. With the exception of the washing machine, white goods are the Tenants’ 7. Upon inspection, the Tribunal noted: 7.1 damp/water ingress damage in need of repair; 7.2 garden/fencing in poor state of repair; and 7.4 Tenant commented certain white goods were faulty. Evidence and Hearing 8. Written submission were made by the Tenants, who also attended a hearing which took place following the inspection of the property on 22 July 2024. The Landlord did not make any submissions and did not attend the hearing. 8.1 The Tenants’ submissions largely addressed questions of the landlord/tenant relationship and maintenance of the Property. Many of the issues raised did not fall within the scope of the Tribunal’s rental determination. 8.2 Neither the Landlord nor the Tenants provided any rental comparables. At the hearing, the Tenants mentioned nearby properties available at lower rents, but no details were provided. The rent sought by the Tenants was £1,100 per month. The Law 9. The Tribunal must first determine that the Landlord’s notice under section 13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.

10. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires the Tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

11. In so doing the Tribunal, is required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act.

12. Section 14(4) provides that for the purposes of section 14 “rent” includes amongst other things any sums payable to the landlord by the tenant in respect of council tax.

13. Section 14(4) provides that for the purposes of section 14 “rent” does not include a “service charge” within the meaning of section 18 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (i.e. where in accordance with the terms of the tenancy or other agreement a service charge payable by the tenant is variable from time to time according to changes in the relevant costs). However it does include a “fixed” service charge. Tribunal’s Deliberations 14. The Tribunal determined the Notice to be valid in accordance with s13(2).

15. The Tribunal determined that the open market rent for a comparable property to the Property in good condition was £1,400.00 per month.

16. The Tribunal determined that deductions totalling £150.00 per month should be made from this rent to allow for items of disrepair.

17. The Tribunal therefore determined that the open market rent for the Property in accordance with the statutory basis is £1,250.00 per month.

19. This rent will take effect from 1 March 2024 being the date stipulated in the Notice.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined the landlord's notice to increase rent was valid.
  • The open market rent for a comparable property in good condition was determined to be £1,400.00 per month.
  • A deduction of £150.00 per month was made from the rent due to items of disrepair.
  • The determined rent of £1,250.00 per month will take effect from the date stipulated in the landlord's notice.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for the property was set at £1,250 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and compared it to similar properties.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparison to similar properties.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may be able to challenge their rent if they believe it is too high based on the property's condition and market value.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The condition of the property and comparisons to similar properties mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.