First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £795 for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting it at £795 per month. They used their professional expertise and knowledge of local market conditions to determine the fair rent.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent assessment based on the open market value of the property, considering its condition and location.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the property's condition and location, among other factors.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and professional expertise.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £795 per month, based on market conditions and professional expertise, considering the property's condition and location.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2023/0266
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 7 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 23 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £795.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 January 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
4. Date assured tenancy commenced Unknown.
5. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly.
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Part furnished.
8. Description of premises Victorian two storey two bedroom house.
[NAME] of Decision 14 March 2024
1
Case Reference : BIR/00CN/MNR/2023/0266
Property
: 7 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : Appeal against a Notice proposing a new rent under an
Assured Periodic Tenancy under section 13(4) of the Housing
Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME]. [NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) [NAME] B.Sc. [NAME]. [NAME] and Venue of : N/A. Paper determination. Hearing
Date of Decision : 14 March 2024
____________________________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
1 The rent is determined at £795.00 (Seven Hundred and Ninety Five Pounds) per month with effect from 1 January 2024.
REASONS
Introduction
2 The Applicant, [APPELLANT], had not provided a copy of any tenancy agreement but is understood to be an Assured Periodic tenant of the subject property.
3 On 27 November 2023 the landlord served notice of increase under section 13(2) of The Housing Act 1988 proposing a rent increase from £600.00 to £850.00 per month with effect from 1 January 2024. The rent did not include Council Tax or water charges.
4 On 18 December 2023 the tenant applied to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) to determine the rent.
5 The Tribunal issued Directions on 28 December 2023 and subsequently determined the rent on 14 March 2024 under section 14 of The Housing Act 1988, at £795.00 per month.
6 On 17 April 2024 the Tribunal received a request for Reasons from the tenant which are set out below.
The Law
7 Section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 ('the Act') states:
'(1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy -
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to
which the notice relates;
(b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice;
(c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as
those of the tenancy to which the notice relates;...'
'(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded -
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant;
(b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant
improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the
tenant, if the improvement-
(i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to the
immediate landlord ...
8 The jurisdiction of the Rent Assessment Committee was transferred to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) on 1 July 2013.
3
Facts Found
9 The Tribunal did not inspect the property and reached its Decision based on the tenant's submission and views of [ADDRESS] on Google Streetview.
10 The property is a traditional Victorian terraced house in inner Birmingham. It fronts the pavement.
11 According to the tenant's application form, the accommodation comprises two living rooms, a kitchen, bathroom, two bedrooms and back garden.
Submissions
12 The Applicant's Submission
The Applicant provided very little information other than a list of rooms in the property and four points:
a) a note that there was damp in the rooms, some of which had been painted over;
b) the stair rail was loose;
c) the carpets had not been replaced and were claimed to be insanitary and
d) that Miss [APPELLANT] was in receipt of Universal Credit benefits.
13 The Respondent's Submission
No submissions were received from the landlord.
Decision
14 Neither party requested a Hearing and the Decision was reached on the submitted papers.
15 Neither party had provided any evidence of rents of other flats in the area and the Tribunal reached its decision based on its professional expertise and general knowledge. The Tribunal were aware there was very little to let in the area and the asking rents of those properties that were advertised were generally higher than the landlord's asking rent of £800.00 per month. Bearing in mind the location, condition of the property and general levels of market rents, the Tribunal considered the rental value based on the definition in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 to have been £795.00 (Seven Hundred and Ninety Five Pounds) per month at the effective date of Notice, 1 January 2024.
16 The Tribunal were advised by the Applicant that she was in receipt of Benefit payments and that the Authorities would not pay more than £625.00 per month but were provided with no evidence that the rent determined would cause undue hardship. Accordingly, it determined the effective date of its Decision as the date in the Notice, 1 January 2024.
[NAME] B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS
Chairman
Appeal
In accordance with section 11 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 and rule 21 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) ([NAME]) Rules 2010, the Tenant / respondent may make further application for permission to appeal to the
4
Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) on a point of law only. Such application must be made in writing and received by the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) no later than 28 days after the date on which the First-tier Tribunal sent notice of this refusal to the party applying for permission to appeal. Where possible, you should send your further application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL], as this will enable the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) to deal with it more efficiently.
Alternatively, the Upper Tribunal ([NAME]) may be contacted at: 5th [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (tel: [PHONE]).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £850 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £800 for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £800 for Semi-Detached House
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £900
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £800
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined the rent based on its professional expertise and general knowledge of market rents.
- The property's location and condition were considered when determining the rental value.
- The Tribunal found that asking rents for similar properties in the area were generally higher than the landlord's proposed rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's claim of damp, loose stair rail, and insanitary carpets did not lead to a lower rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £795 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on their professional expertise and knowledge of local market conditions.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the professional assessment of the property's market value.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting the rent lower than what the landlord proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can seek a rent determination through the First-tier Tribunal if they disagree with their landlord's proposed rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence such as the condition of the property and local market conditions were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.
