First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting the monthly rent at £1575 excluding water rates and council tax, following the Housing Act 1988.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This applies to periodic tenancies where the terms match those of the original tenancy, except for the rent amount.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the monthly rent at £1575 excluding water rates and council tax.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Other
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AY/MNR/2022/0196
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 94a [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tribunal Judge H. Lumby Ms M. Krisko FRICS
Landlord [NAME] 21a [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1575 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 30 October 2023
3. The amount included for services is not applicable nil Per
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 December 2015
6. Length of the term or rental period 12 months
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord responsible as per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Tenant to keep interior and fixtures and fitting in at least as good and clean condition than at date of grant of lease, fair wear and tear excepted and to keep the premises reasonably aired and warmed.
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord White goods only
9. Description of premises Split level basement and ground floor flat comprising two bedrooms, one kitchen, one living room, one bathroom/WC and one shower room/WC together with a garden
Chairman H Lumby Date of Decision 30 October 2023
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant successfully invoked the Housing Act 1988 to set their rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- There are no concrete factors listed that went against the claimant in the provided cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1575 excluding water rates and council tax.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a landlord and a tenant in an assured periodic tenancy.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court followed the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent, ensuring it was fair and reasonable.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument centered around the application of the Housing Act 1988 to set a fair and reasonable rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was neutral, applying the law to set the rent.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on rent determination.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included details of the tenancy agreement and relevant statutory provisions.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.