VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) has decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. The monthly rent was set at £745, effective from June 12, 2022, according to Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a register of rents under an assured periodic tenancy as per Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy agreementsrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect on 12 June 2022, setting the monthly rent at £745 excluding certain taxes.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CN/MNR/2022/0040

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 96 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

[NAME] 291 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

1. The rent is: £745.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 12 June 2022

3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per N/A

4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 12 February 2020

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 of Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Not Applicable

9. Description of premises 2 storey semi-detached house comprising hall, lounge, dining room, kitchen, 3 bedrooms, bathroom with wash hand basin and separate WC. [ADDRESS] and single garage.

[NAME] of Decision 15 August 2022

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the monthly rent to be £745.00.
  • The decision on the rent took effect from June 12, 2022.
  • The tenancy was an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The tenancy commenced on February 12, 2020.
  • The landlord is responsible for repairs as per Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £745.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which requires a register of rents for assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically Section 14.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the statutory requirement for a register of rents under assured periodic tenancies.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should refer to Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on rent registration.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence likely included documentation related to the tenancy agreement and previous rent payments.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can often be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.