Ground Rent Collection Fees Not Payable By Tenants
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that certain ground rent collection fees are not payable by tenants under their leases. The decision was made based on the terms of the lease and the lack of contractual recovery for these fees.
⚖️ Legal holding
Ground rent collection fees are not payable by tenants if they are not contractually recoverable as administration charges under the lease.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal ruled that certain ground rent collection fees are not payable by tenants under their leases.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that the 'Admin costs for collection of ground rents' of £39 per quarter, per flat are not payable by tenants under their leases. The Tribunal also ordered that none of the landlord's costs of these proceedings may be passed to the tenants through any service charge.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AY/LAC/2023/0019 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicants : [redacted] Ms [NAME] (Flat 2) Ms [NAME] (Flat 3) Mr [NAME] (Flat 4) Mr [COUNSEL] (Flat 5) Mr [COUNSEL] (Flat 6) Representative : Mr [COUNSEL] Respondent : [redacted] : [RESPONDENT] of [NAME] : For the determination of the liability to pay administration charges under Paragraph 5 of Schedule 11 to the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 Tribunal member : Judge J P Donegan Venue : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 20 March 2024
DECISION
This has been a paper determination. A face-to-face hearing was not held, as I considered it unnecessary. All issues could be decided on the documents.
2 Decisions of the Tribunal A. The Tribunal determines the “Admin costs for collection of ground rent” of £39 per quarter, per flat are not payable by the applicants. B. The Tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (‘the 1985 Act’) so that none of the respondent’s costs of these Tribunal proceedings may be passed to the applicants through any service charge. C. The Tribunal makes an order under paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 to the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (‘the 2002 Act’) extinguishing the applicants’ liability to pay administration charges in respect of litigation costs of these Tribunal proceedings. D. The respondent must reimburse the [NAME] fee of £100 (One Hundred Pounds) paid by Mr [NAME] by 5:00pm on 17 April 2024. The background and procedural history 1. The applicants are the long leaseholders of the six flats at 53 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (‘[NAME]’). The respondent is the freeholder of [NAME]. The leaseholders acquired the right to manage [NAME] in late 2021. The respondent’s agents, [RESPONDENT] (‘[NAME]’) collect the ground rents from the applicants.
2. The applicants seek a determination pursuant to Schedule 11 to the 2002 Act, as to their liability to pay ground rent collection fees of £39 per quarter, per flat. They also seek an order for the limitation of the respondent’s costs in the proceedings under section 20C of the 1985 Act and an order to reduce or extinguish their liability to pay administration charges in respect of litigation costs, under paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 to the 2002 Act.
3. The [NAME] was submitted by Mr [NAME] on 27 September 2023. Directions were issued on 31 October 2023 and the was case allocated to the paper track, to be determined upon the basis of written representations. None of the parties has objected to this allocation or requested an oral hearing.
4. Ms [NAME], Ms [NAME], Ms [NAME] and Mr [NAME] were added as applicants to the proceedings by an order of Judge Martynski dated 09 January 2024. [NAME] was added as an applicant by a direction of Judge Vance dated 05 March 2024.
3 5. The paper determination took place on 20 March 2024. When [NAME] my decision, I considered a 121-page, digital bundle lodged by the applicant and a one-page email from [NAME] dated 05 December 2023.
6. The relevant legal provisions are set out in the appendix to this decision. The issues 7. The only issues to be determined by the Tribunal are: (a) the ‘payability’ of ground rent collection fees demanded by [NAME] on behalf of the respondent, and (b) the applications for orders under section 20C of the 1985 Act and paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 to the 2002 Act.
8. The current ground rent for each flat is £250 per annum. [NAME] issue quarterly rent demands for £62.50, which include an additional charge of £39 for “Admin costs for collection of ground rents”.
9. The total collection fees demanded from each applicant are: Flat 1 (December 2021-February 2024) £390 Flat 2 (December 2021-February 2024) £351 Flat 3 (December 2021-February 2024) £390 Flat 4 (June 2022 to February 2024)
£312 Flat 5 (March 2022 to February 2024)
£312 Flat 6 (March 2023 to February 2024)
£195 The lease 10. The applicants’ bundle contained a sample lease (Flat 5). This was granted by [COMPANY] (“Lessor”) to [NAME] [NAME] (“Lessee”) for a term of 125 years from 29 September 2016.
11. The particulars include the following definitions: “PAYMENT DATES The usual quarter days … MAINTENANCE RENT One sixth of the costs and expenses that the Lessor incurs pursuant to its covenants contained in the Second Schedule hereto …
4 RENT £250 per annum for the first 25 years”.
12. Clause 1 and paragraph 1 of the third schedule oblige the Lessee to pay the Rent and the Maintenance Rent on the Payment Dates.
13. The Lessor’s covenants are to be found in the the second schedule and include: “11. Employing any workmen necessary for the proper maintenance of [NAME] and a Managing Agent Solicitor Accountant Surveyor or other professional adviser in connection with the management of [NAME] including Maintenance Rent calculation and collection”. The applicants’ case 14. The applicants contend the collection fees, which equate to approximately 62% of the ground rent, are unreasonable. They also rely on a previous First-tier Tribunal (‘F-tT’) decision dated 02 May 2023, for [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (case reference CAM/00KB/LAC/2022/0003). That case involved the same freeholder, [COMPANY] and agents, [NAME]. The F-tT disallowed rent collection fees of £36 per annum as they were not recoverable as administration charges under the lease. The respondent’s case 15. The directions required the respondent to send the applicant a statement setting out the relevant provisions in the lease and any legal submissions in support of the charges claimed. [NAME] sent a brief email to the Tribunal case officer on 05 December 2023 simply stating, “The clause that the landlord would rely on is clause 11 of the Second Schedule”. This was the full extent of their case. Discussion 16. The starting point is to determine whether the collection fees are contractually recoverable as administration charges under the leases. If so, I must then consider whether the charges are reasonable, as a variable administration charge is payable only to the extent it is reasonable (paragraph 2 of Schedule 11 to the 2002 Act).
17. The respondent relies on paragraph 11 of the second schedule to the lease. This entitles them to employ various people/professionals in connection with the management of [NAME]. They can then recover one-sixth of these costs from each leaseholder, as “Maintenance Rent” i.e a service charge.
5 18. The disputed fees are claimed as “Admin costs” and relate to the collection of ground rent. They have been charged by respondent’s agents, [NAME]. Paragraph 11 of the second schedule refers to Maintenance Rent collection but makes no mention of ground rent collection. Further, any costs incurred under this paragraph can only be recovered as a service charge.
19. The collection fees do not come within paragraph 11 of the second schedule, are not contractually recoverable as administration charges and are not payable by the applicants. It is therefore it unnecessary to consider whether these fees are reasonable. Section 20C, paragraph 5A and refund of fees 20. The applicants have been wholly successful, as I have disallowed the ground rent collection fees. They were entirely justified in pursuing this [NAME] and it is just and equitable to make orders under section 20C of the 1985 Act and paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 to the 2002 Act. For the same reasons, I also order the respondent to reimburse the Tribunal [NAME] fee of £100. This was paid by Mr [NAME] and must be reimbursed to him by 5:00pm on 17 April 2024. Name: Judge J P Donegan Date: 20 March 2024 Rights of appeal By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, [NAME] and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking.
6 If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). Appendix of relevant legislation
Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 Section 20C Limitation of service charges: costs of proceedings (1) A tenant may make an [NAME] for an order that all or any of the costs incurred, or to be incurred, by the landlord in connection with proceedings before a court, residential property tribunal or the Upper Tribunal, or in connection with arbitration proceedings, are not to be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge payable by the tenant or any other person or persons specified in the [NAME]. (2) The [NAME] shall be made— (a) in the case of court proceedings, to the court before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, to a county court; (aa) in the case of proceedings before a residential property tribunal, to that tribunal; (b) in the case of proceedings before a residential property tribunal, to the tribunal before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, to any residential property tribunal; (c) in the case of proceedings before the Upper Tribunal, to the tribunal; (d) in the case of arbitration proceedings, to the arbitral tribunal or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, to a county court. (3) The court or tribunal to which the [NAME] is made may make such order on the [NAME] as it considers just and equitable in the circumstances.
Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 Schedule 11 Part 1 Reasonableness of Administration Charges Meaning of “administration charges” 1(1) In this Part of this Schedule “administration charge” means an amount payable by a tenant of a [NAME] as part of or in addition to the rent which is payable, directly or indirectly— (a) for or in connection with the grant of approvals under his lease, or applications for such approvals,
7 (b) for or in connection with the provision of information or documents by or on behalf of the landlord or a person who is party to his lease otherwise than as [NAME], (c) in respect of a failure by the tenant to make a payment by the due date to the landlord or a person who is party to his lease otherwise than as [NAME], or (d) in connection with a breach (or alleged breach) of a covenant or condition in his lease. (2) But an amount payable by the tenant of a [NAME] the rent of which is registered under Part 4 of the Rent Act 1977 (c. 42) is not an administration charge, unless the amount registered is entered as a variable amount in pursuance of section 71(4) of that Act. (3) In this Part of this Schedule “variable administration charge” means an administration charge payable by a tenant which is neither— (a) specified in his lease, nor (b) calculated in accordance with a formula specified in his lease. (4) An order amending sub-paragraph (1) may be made by the appropriate national authority. Reasonableness of administration charges 2 A variable administration charge is payable only to the extent that the amount of the charge is reasonable. … Liability to pay administration charges 5 (1) An [NAME] may be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether an administration charge is payable and, if it is, as to— (a) the person by whom it is payable, (b) the person to whom it is payable, (c) the amount which is payable, (d) the date at or by which it is payable, and (e) the manner in which it is payable. (2) Sub-paragraph (1) applies whether or not any payment has been made. (3) The jurisdiction conferred on the appropriate tribunal in respect of any matter by virtue of sub-paragraph (1) is in addition to any jurisdiction of a court in respect of the matter. (4) No [NAME] under sub-paragraph (1) may be made in respect of a matter which— (a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant, (b) has been, or is to be, referred to arbitration pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement to which the tenant is a party,
8 (c) has been the subject of determination by a court, or (d) has been the subject of determination by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement. (5) But the tenant is not to be taken to have agreed or admitted any matter by reason only of having made any payment. (6) An agreement by the tenant of a [NAME] (other than a post-dispute arbitration agreement) is void in so far as it purports to provide for a determination— (a) in a particular manner, or (b) on particular evidence, of any question which may be the subject matter of an [NAME] under sub-paragraph (1).
Limitation of administration charges: costs of proceedings 5A (1) A [NAME] may apply to the relevant court or tribunal for an order reducing or extinguishing the tenant’s liability to pay a particular administration charge in respect of litigation costs. (2) The relevant court or tribunal may make whatever order on the [NAME] it considers to be just and equitable. (3) In this paragraph – (a) “litigation costs” means costs incurred, or to be incurred, by the landlord in connection with proceedings of a kind mentioned in the table, and (b) “the relevant court or tribunal” means the court or tribunal mentioned in the table in relation to those proceedings. Proceedings to which costs relate “The relevant court or tribunal” Court proceedings The court before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, the county court First-tier Tribunal proceedings The First-tier Tribunal Upper Tribunal proceedings The Upper Tribunal Arbitration proceedings The arbitral tribunal or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, the county court.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Not Liable for Ground Rent Collection Charge
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Appoints Manager Due to Breach of Lease Obligations
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Reasonableness of Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Service Charge Limitations Against Landlord
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal rejects unreasonable service charges and administration charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Lease Premium Under the 1993 Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Service Charges Owed by Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules Against Ground Rent Collection Fees
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Reasonableness of Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Service Charges for Leaseholders
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules on Reasonableness of Service Charges
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reviews Service Charges Under Landlord and Tenant Act 1…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Ground rent collection fees are not payable if not contractually recoverable.
- Service charges must be reasonable and properly disclosed.
- Tenants are not liable for unreasonable administration charges.
- Landlords must comply with lease terms and management codes.
- Service charges should be limited if landlords fail to consult properly.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision ruled that certain ground rent collection fees are not payable by tenants under their leases.
Who was involved?
Tenants and a landlord were involved in the dispute over ground rent collection fees.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the fees were not payable because they were not contractually recoverable as administration charges under the lease.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the fees were not recoverable as administration charges under the lease.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenants who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should review their lease to determine if the fees are contractually recoverable.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The lease terms and the legal provisions regarding administration charges were crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving lease disputes.
