HMO Licence Appeal Dismissed: Room Size Below Statutory Requirement
📌 In brief
The appeal challenging a condition on an HMO a person due to a room's size being below the statutory requirement was dismissed by the First-tier Tribunal. The room in question was deemed too small to meet the legal standards set by the Housing Act 2004.
⚖️ Legal holding
A local housing authority must include a condition in an HMO a person ensuring that the floor area of any room used as sleeping accommodation by an adult is not less than 6.51 square metres.
📖 What the law says
This section outlines the conditions under which a local housing authority must decide whether to grant or refuse a license for a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO). It requires the authority to ensure the house is suitable for the number of households or persons mentioned, that the proposed license holder is fit and proper, and that the management arrangements are satisfactory.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding an HMO a person condition due to the room's size being below the statutory requirement.
📜 Headnote Official document
The appeal concerned a condition on an HMO licence due to a room's size being below the statutory requirement. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming the local housing authority's decision.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2014
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BG/HML/2020/0026 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) : V: CVP VIDEO Property : 23 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : In person Respondent : [redacted] Representative : Mr [COUNSEL], Solicitor Type of [NAME] : Appeal in respect of an [NAME] - section 64 & Part 3 of Schedule 5 to the Housing Act 2004 Tribunal Members : Judge N [NAME] and date of hearing : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] on 4 December 2020 Date of Decision : 8 June 2021
DECISION
2 Covid-19 pandemic: VIDEO HEARING This has been a remote video hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was V: CVP REMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined in a remote hearing. The documents that we were referred to are contained in a single bundle provided by the Applicant and a single bundle provided by the Respondent, the contents of which we have noted. The order made is described below. Decision of the Tribunal The appeal is dismissed. The Tribunal’s determination 1. This is an appeal under section 64 and Part 3 of Schedule 5 to the Housing Act 2004 against the imposition of a condition concerning the occupancy of a [NAME] on the grant by the Respondent to the Applicant of a [NAME] for a house in multiple occupation (“HMO”) in respect of 23 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (“the Property”).
2. The [NAME] is valid from 5 November 2020 and provides in respect of a room known as “[NAME] 4” that the floor area is 6.3 square metres and that the “maximum number permitted for sleeping” is nil. The accompanying notes state: “Please be aware that [NAME] 4 was excluded because it is less than the minimum standardised size of 6.5m2. Do not renew [NAME] 4’s tenancy agreement.” 3. The Applicant was notified of the [NAME] by a written notice dated 11 November 2021. It is common ground that the size of [NAME] 4 is slightly under 6.5 metres square and that the [NAME] of the room is an adult. The Applicant wishes to continue to let room 4 for occupation by an adult and she informed the Tribunal of various features which make the [NAME] 4 particularly attractive to prospective tenants.
4. Paragraphs 31 and 34 of Part 3 of Schedule 5 to the Housing Act 2004 provide: 31 Right to appeal against refusal or grant of [NAME] (1) The applicant or any relevant person may appeal to the appropriate tribunal against a decision by the local housing authority on an [NAME] for a [NAME]–
3 (a) to refuse to grant the [NAME], or (b) to grant the [NAME]. (2) An appeal under sub-paragraph (1)(b) may, in particular, relate to any of the terms of the [NAME]. … 34 Powers of tribunal hearing appeal (1) This paragraph applies to appeals to the appropriate tribunal under paragraph 31 or 32. (2) An appeal– (a) is to be by way of a re-hearing, but (b) may be determined having regard to matters of which the authority were unaware. (3) The tribunal may confirm, reverse or vary the decision of the local housing authority. (4) On an appeal under paragraph 31 the tribunal may direct the authority to grant a [NAME] to the applicant for the [NAME] on such terms as the tribunal may direct.
5. The hearing of the appeal took place by CVP video on 7 June 2021. The Applicant attended the hearing in person and the Respondent was represented by Mr [COUNSEL], Solicitor. The Tribunal heard oral evidence from [NAME] [COUNSEL] [NAME], a Housing Standards Officer within the Respondent’s Health and Housing Team.
6. The Applicant wished to explore whether the Tribunal had any discretion to allow an adult to use [NAME] 4 as sleeping accommodation. The Respondent relies upon paragraph 1A of Schedule 4 to the Housing Act 2004 which provides (emphasis supplied): 1A.— Additional conditions to be included in licences under Part 2: floor area etc. (1) Where the HMO is in England, a [NAME] under Part 2 must include the following conditions. (2) Conditions requiring the [NAME]—
4 (a) to ensure that the floor area of any room in the HMO used as sleeping accommodation by one person aged over 10 years is not less than 6.51 square metres;
7. Having considered the express wording of paragraph 1A of Schedule 4 to the Housing Act 2004, we are satisfied that the [NAME] must include a condition requiring the Applicant to ensure that the floor area of any room which is to be used as sleeping accommodation by an adult is not less than 6.51 square metres and that neither the Respondent nor the Tribunal has any discretion to waive or vary this statutory requirement.
8. Paragraph 1B of Schedule 4 to the Housing Act 2004 provides as follows: 1B.— Time for compliance with conditions under paragraph 1A(2) and (3) (1) This paragraph applies in relation to an HMO in England in respect of the first [NAME] granted on or after 1st October 2018 in relation to the HMO, regardless of whether a [NAME] was in force in relation to the HMO immediately before that date. (2) If the local housing authority consider that, at the time the [NAME] is granted, the [NAME] is not complying with one or more of the conditions of the [NAME] imposed pursuant to paragraph 1A(2) and (3), the authority must when granting the [NAME] provide the [NAME] with a notification specifying the condition or conditions and the period within which the [NAME] is required to comply with the condition or conditions. (3) The period specified in the notification must not exceed 18 months from the date of the notification. (4) Within the period specified in the notification— (a) the local housing authority may not revoke the [NAME] for a breach (or repeated breach) of any condition of the [NAME] specified in the notification, (b) the [NAME] does not commit an offence under section 72(3) in respect of any failure to comply with such a condition, and (c) the local housing authority may not impose a financial penalty under section 249A on the [NAME] in respect of such a failure.
5 (5) Sub-paragraphs (2) to (4) do not apply if, before the [NAME] was granted, the [NAME] was convicted of an offence under section 72(2) or (3) in relation to the HMO.
9. The Applicant informed the Tribunal that the [NAME] is likely to leave the Property in approximately a month’s time and that she intends to sell the Property. A question arose as to whether the Tribunal might be willing to vary the [NAME] in order to enable the Applicant to let [NAME] 4 to a [NAME] for a brief period, not exceeding 18 months “from the date of the notification”, pending the proposed sale. 10. [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] gave evidence that, when a room is below the minimum statutory size, it is the Respondent’s policy to only allow a [NAME] time for compliance in accordance with paragraph 1B to give time for an [NAME] to vacate the room.
11. It is not necessary for the Tribunal to consider whether the 18 month period could serve any other purpose because, on the facts of this case, we are satisfied that the [NAME] should not be varied so as to enable a [NAME] to enter into occupation of [NAME] 4.
12. The 18 month period runs from November 2020 and therefore ends in May 2022, and there is currently a tenant in occupation of [NAME]
4. The Applicant expects this tenant to leave in early July 2021 but she was not certain whether the tenant could be required to vacate in a month’s time, if they chose not to leave. [NAME] would be likely to be entitled to remain in occupation for at least 6 months, following which it might be necessary for the Applicant to take steps to require them to vacate. 13. [NAME] would be entering into occupation of a room with a floor size of less than 6.51 square metres and there is a real risk that it might not be possible for the Applicant to ensure that a [NAME] would vacate [NAME] 4 by May 2022.
14.
In all the circumstances, we do not consider it appropriate to vary the terms of the [NAME] and we dismiss the Applicant’s appeal.
Name: Judge Hawkes Date: 8 June 2021
Rights of appeal
6 By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Appeal on HMO Licence Renewal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Upholds Financial Penalty for Unlicensed HMO
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Upholds HMO License Decision for Three Persons
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rejects Appeal on Housing Improvement Notice
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Upholds HMO Licence Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Upholds Refusal of HMO Licence Due to Lack of Planning …
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Upholds Refusal of HMO Licences Due to Non-Compliance History
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Upholds HMO Licence Condition Requiring Separate Kitchen Room
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Upholds Refusal of HMO Licence Due to Unsuitability
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Upholds HMO Licensing Decision with Occupancy Restrictions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Financial Penalty Upheld for HMO Classification in First-tier Tribunal
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The local housing authority must ensure that the floor area of any room used as sleeping accommodation by one person aged over 18 is not less than 6.51 square metres.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- Local authorities must enforce the minimum size requirements for bedrooms in HMOs as per the Housing Act 2004 and additional licensing schemes.
- A house must be reasonably suitable for occupation by the maximum number of households or persons mentioned in the application.
- A local housing authority is entitled to specify its own requirements for fire safety and kitchen placement in HMO licences.
- The minimum bedroom size requirement under the Housing Act 2004 must be strictly adhered to, even if the overall property layout allows for alternative uses of space.
- A local housing authority can refuse to grant an HMO licence if there is no planning permission for the property to be used as an HMO.
- A local authority may impose a financial penalty if satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that a person’s conduct amounts to a relevant housing offence.
- A property is considered an HMO if it meets certain criteria outlined in the Housing Act 2004.
- Local housing authorities must consider the suitability of a property for multiple occupation based on prescribed standards and the overall layout of the house.
- A person with a history of non-compliance with planning regulations and previous convictions is not deemed fit and proper to obtain an HMO licence.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The appeal challenging a condition on an HMO licence due to a room's size being below the statutory requirement was dismissed.
Who was involved?
The appeal was brought by a tenant against a local housing authority's decision regarding an HMO licence.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to dismiss the appeal, stating that the room's size must meet the statutory requirement of at least 6.51 square metres.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 2004, specifically sections 64 and Schedule 5 paragraphs 31 and 34, were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the room's size must meet the statutory requirement of at least 6.51 square metres.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
For someone in a similar situation, the room size must meet the statutory requirement to avoid such conditions on their HMO licence.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence and documents related to the room's size and the statutory requirements were crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving HMO licensing.
