Landlord Granted Dispensation for Fire Alarm Installation
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to bypass certain consultation requirements for installing fire alarms, citing safety concerns and high costs related to ACM cladding.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may be dispensed from consultation requirements if it is reasonable to do so under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📖 What the law says
The First-tier Tribunal can decide to waive consultation requirements for certain works or long-term agreements if it finds it reasonable to do so.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal granted the landlord's a person for dispensation from consultation requirements for installing fire alarms.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal granted an application for dispensation from consultation requirements for installing fire alarms, citing safety concerns and costs associated with ACM cladding.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : LON/00AG/LDC/2021/0022 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio)
A: BTMMREMOTE Property : The Ivery, 159 – 161 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] : Ms [COUNSEL] [NAME] Solicitors Respondent : [redacted] in the [NAME] : [COUNSEL] a litigant in person acting on behalf of the [NAME] of [NAME] : Dispensation from consultation requirements Tribunal member(s) : Judge H Carr Venue : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 17th June 2021
DECISION
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote hearing on the papers which was not objected to by the parties. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined in on paper. The documents that the Tribunal were referred to are in a bundle of 146 pages plus a statement from the Respondents, the contents of which have been noted.
2 Decision of the tribunal 1. The Tribunal determines to exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements contained in Schedule 4 to the Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003. The [NAME] (1) On 19th January 2021 the Applicant landlord issued two applications for dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of (i) the replacement of Category 3 ACM cladding on the building - LON/00AG/LDC/2021/0020 and (ii) the installation of fire alarms - LON/00AG/LDC/2021/0022. (2) Notices of intent relating to both applications were served on the [NAME] on 15th January 2021. The applications were said to be urgent because of safety concerns posed to the residents by the existing cladding and the cost of providing a waking watch service. (3) The two applications were joined following directions issued by Judge Latham on 29th January 2021. (4) Following the issue of directions negotiations proceeded between the parties and various agreements were reached. At the same time the parties complied with the directions by providing bundles of documents etc. The Applicant confirmed to the Tribunal that it had carried out the instructions in the directions relating to the dispensation [NAME]. (5) On 21st May 2021 the [NAME] relating to cladding (0020 ) was withdrawn. The tribunal noted that [NAME] 0022 remained and determined to hold a CMH in respect of that [NAME]. (6) At that CMC , held on the morning of 17th June 2021, which was attended by Ms [APPELLANT] of [NAME] and Ms [APPELLANT] on behalf of the applicant [NAME] it was established that the [NAME] had no objections to the [NAME] for dispensation relating to the fire alarms. The applicants also wanted a s.20C determination that no costs relating to the [NAME] would be added to the service charge account. [COUNSEL] whose firm is newly instructed by the Applicant said that as long as the matter was dealt with swiftly the respondent was content to agree that none of the costs relating to the [NAME] would be added to the service charge account. (7) The tribunal and the parties agreed that rather than issue further directions it was appropriate for the tribunal to make a decision on the papers before it, bearing in mind the discussions at the CMC. Determination The Evidence
3 2. The evidence before the Tribunal indicates as follows: (i) The Applicant became aware that works are required to the property due to issues relating to the external façade of the, namely the presence of ACM Cladding. (ii) The Applicant has installed a fire alarm system to dispense with the need for the waking watch that was provided to mitigate the risk from the presence of the cladding. The waking watch service was very expensive for [NAME]. (iii) The Applicant seeks dispensation from the consultation requirements under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for the following reasons: (a) The combustible nature of the exterior of the Premises pose a significant health and safety risk to the residents at the Premises. (b) The Applicant, following advice, initiated a waking watch. This is a costly provision. (c) To dispense with the need of the waking watch, a fire alarm was advised to be installed. This is a more affordable response to the problem posed by the cladding as it mitigates the costs of the waking watch whilst providing reassurance as to the fire risk. (d) This needed to be done as soon as possible as any delay has cost implications for the [NAME]. (iv) The Applicant does not envisage that any financial prejudice has been suffered by the Respondents despite consultation not having been carried out to its full extent. (v) The Applicant agrees that none of the costs arising from this [NAME] will be added to the service charge account.
(vi) No objections have been received from the respondents.
4 The Law (i) The Tribunal is being asked to exercise its discretion under s.20ZA of the Act. The wording of s.20ZA is significant. Subs (1) provides ‘Where an [NAME] is made to a leasehold valuation tribunal for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreements, the tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements’ (emphasis added). The tribunal’s decision 3. The tribunal determines to grant the [NAME].
4. It also makes a s.20C order. Reasons for the tribunal’s decision 5. In the light of the evidence provided to the tribunal it is reasonable to grant the [NAME] sought.
6. This determination does not concern the issue of whether any service charge costs will be reasonable or indeed payable. The Respondents are able, if it appears to them to be appropriate, to make an [NAME] under s.27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 as to reasonableness and payability.
7. The tribunal notes that the Applicant has stated that no service charges will be demanded in connection with costs arising from this [NAME]. Nonetheless, for the avoidance of doubt, the tribunal determines that it is just and equitable in the circumstances for an order to be made under section 20C of the 1985 Act, so that the Applicant may not pass any of its costs incurred in connection with the proceedings before the tribunal through the service charge.
Name: Judge H Carr Date: 17th June 2021
5 Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
6 Appendix of relevant legislation
Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (as amended) Section 18 (1) In the following provisions of this Act "service charge" means an amount payable by a tenant of a dwelling as part of or in addition to the rent - (a) which is payable, directly or indirectly, for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements or insurance or the landlord's costs of management, and (b) the whole or part of which varies or may vary according to the relevant costs. (2) The relevant costs are the costs or estimated costs incurred or to be incurred by or on behalf of the landlord, or a superior landlord, in connection with the matters for which the service charge is payable. (3) For this purpose - (a) "costs" includes overheads, and (b) costs are relevant costs in relation to a service charge whether they are incurred, or to be incurred, in the period for which the service charge is payable or in an earlier or later period. Section 19 (1) Relevant costs shall be taken into account in determining the amount of a service charge payable for a period - (a) only to the extent that they are reasonably incurred, and (b) where they are incurred on the provisions of services or the carrying out of works, only if the services or works are of a reasonable standard; and the amount payable shall be limited accordingly. (2) Where a service charge is payable before the relevant costs are incurred, no greater amount than is reasonable is so payable, and after the relevant costs have been incurred any necessary adjustment shall be made by repayment, reduction or subsequent charges or otherwise. Section 27A (1) An [NAME] may be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether a service charge is payable and, if it is, as to - (a) the person by whom it is payable, (b) the person to whom it is payable, (c) the amount which is payable,
7 (d) the date at or by which it is payable, and (e) the manner in which it is payable. (2) Subsection (1) applies whether or not any payment has been made. (3) An [NAME] may also be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether, if costs were incurred for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements, insurance or management of any specified description, a service charge would be payable for the costs and, if it would, as to - (a) the person by whom it would be payable, (b) the person to whom it would be payable, (c) the amount which would be payable, (d) the date at or by which it would be payable, and (e) the manner in which it would be payable. (4) No [NAME] under subsection (1) or (3) may be made in respect of a matter which - (a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant, (b) has been, or is to be, referred to arbitration pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement to which the tenant is a party, (c) has been the subject of determination by a court, or (d) has been the subject of determination by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement. (5) But the tenant is not to be taken to have agreed or admitted any matter by reason only of having made any payment. Section 20 (1) Where this section applies to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the relevant contributions of tenants are limited in accordance with subsection (6) or (7) (or both) unless the consultation requirements have been either— (a) complied with in relation to the works or agreement, or (b) dispensed with in relation to the works or agreement by (or on appeal from) the appropriate tribunal . (2) In this section “relevant contribution”, in relation to a tenant and any works or agreement, is the amount which he may be required under the terms of his lease to contribute (by the payment of service charges) to relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works or under the agreement. (3) This section applies to qualifying works if relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works exceed an appropriate amount. (4) The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that this section applies to a qualifying long term agreement—
8 (a) if relevant costs incurred under the agreement exceed an appropriate amount, or (b) if relevant costs incurred under the agreement during a period prescribed by the regulations exceed an appropriate amount. (5) An appropriate amount is an amount set by regulations made by the Secretary of State; and the regulations may make provision for either or both of the following to be an appropriate amount— (a) an amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations, and (b) an amount which results in the relevant contribution of any one or more tenants being an amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations. (6) Where an appropriate amount is set by virtue of paragraph (a) of subsection (5), the amount of the relevant costs incurred on carrying out the works or under the agreement which may be taken into account in determining the relevant contributions of tenants is limited to the appropriate amount. (7) Where an appropriate amount is set by virtue of paragraph (b) of that subsection, the amount of the relevant contribution of the tenant, or each of the tenants, whose relevant contribution would otherwise exceed the amount prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, the regulations is limited to the amount so prescribed or determined.] Section 20B (1) If any of the relevant costs taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge were incurred more than 18 months before a demand for payment of the service charge is served on the tenant, then (subject to subsection (2)), the tenant shall not be liable to pay so much of the service charge as reflects the costs so incurred. (2) Subsection (1) shall not apply if, within the period of 18 months beginning with the date when the relevant costs in question were incurred, the tenant was notified in writing that those costs had been incurred and that he would subsequently be required under the terms of his lease to contribute to them by the payment of a service charge. Section 20C (1) A tenant may make an [NAME] for an order that all or any of the costs incurred, or to be incurred, by the landlord in connection with proceedings before a court, residential property tribunal or the Upper Tribunal, or in connection with arbitration proceedings, are
9 not to be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of any service charge payable by the tenant or any other person or persons specified in the [NAME]. (2) The [NAME] shall be made— (a) in the case of court proceedings, to the court before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, to a county court; (aa) in the case of proceedings before a residential property tribunal, to that tribunal; (b) in the case of proceedings before a residential property tribunal, to the tribunal before which the proceedings are taking place or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, to any residential property tribunal; (c) in the case of proceedings before the Upper Tribunal, to the tribunal; (d) in the case of arbitration proceedings, to the arbitral tribunal or, if the [NAME] is made after the proceedings are concluded, to a county court. (3) The court or tribunal to which the [NAME] is made may make such order on the [NAME] as it considers just and equitable in the circumstances. Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 Schedule 11, paragraph 1 (1) In this Part of this Schedule “administration charge” means an amount payable by a tenant of a dwelling as part of or in addition to the rent which is payable, directly or indirectly— (a) for or in connection with the grant of approvals under his lease, or applications for such approvals, (b) for or in connection with the provision of information or documents by or on behalf of the landlord or a person who is party to his lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant, (c) in respect of a failure by the tenant to make a payment by the due date to the landlord or a person who is party to his lease otherwise than as landlord or tenant, or (d) in connection with a breach (or alleged breach) of a covenant or condition in his lease. (2) But an amount payable by the tenant of a dwelling the rent of which is registered under Part 4 of the Rent Act 1977 (c. 42) is not an administration charge, unless the amount registered is entered as a variable amount in pursuance of section 71(4) of that Act.
10 (3) In this Part of this Schedule “variable administration charge” means an administration charge payable by a tenant which is neither— (a) specified in his lease, nor (b) calculated in accordance with a formula specified in his lease. (4) An order amending sub-paragraph (1) may be made by the appropriate national authority. Schedule 11, paragraph 2 A variable administration charge is payable only to the extent that the amount of the charge is reasonable. Schedule 11, paragraph 5 (1) An [NAME] may be made to the appropriate tribunal for a determination whether an administration charge is payable and, if it is, as to— (a) the person by whom it is payable, (b) the person to whom it is payable, (c) the amount which is payable, (d) the date at or by which it is payable, and (e) the manner in which it is payable. (2) Sub-paragraph (1) applies whether or not any payment has been made. (3) The jurisdiction conferred on the appropriate tribunal in respect of any matter by virtue of sub-paragraph (1) is in addition to any jurisdiction of a court in respect of the matter. (4) No [NAME] under sub-paragraph (1) may be made in respect of a matter which— (a) has been agreed or admitted by the tenant, (b) has been, or is to be, referred to arbitration pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement to which the tenant is a party, (c) has been the subject of determination by a court, or (d) has been the subject of determination by an arbitral tribunal pursuant to a post-dispute arbitration agreement. (5) But the tenant is not to be taken to have agreed or admitted any matter by reason only of having made any payment. (6) An agreement by the tenant of a dwelling (other than a post-dispute arbitration agreement) is void in so far as it purports to provide for a determination— (a) in a particular manner, or
11 (b) on particular evidence, of any question which may be the subject matter of an [NAME] under sub-paragraph (1). (8)
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Cold Water Pump Replacement
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Landlord Granted Dispensation for Emergency Call System Upgrade
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Drainage Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Major Works Consultation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation from Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Fire Safety Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation from Consultation Requirements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Repairs Due to Water Damage
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation from Consultation Requirements for …
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Major Works Consultation
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The landlord demonstrates that consulting tenants would be unreasonable.
- The landlord shows that alternative measures are in place to protect tenant interests.
- The landlord proves that the situation meets the criteria outlined in Section 20ZA.
- The landlord provides evidence that consultation is not necessary for the decision at hand.
- The landlord establishes that the circumstances justify bypassing the consultation requirement.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors listed as all cases favored the landlord)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The decision allowed the landlord to bypass consultation requirements for installing fire alarms.
Who was involved?
The landlord and leaseholders were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to grant the application because it was reasonable to do so given the safety concerns and costs associated with ACM cladding.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The court applied the Service Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 sections 20ZA and 20C.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the safety concerns and costs associated with the ACM cladding.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might be able to bypass consultation requirements if there are significant safety concerns and costs involved.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence regarding the safety concerns and costs associated with the ACM cladding was important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving legal disputes.
