Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £650 per month, ignoring improvements made by the tenant and considering the property's location and terms of the tenancy.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have the market rent of their property determined according to the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent based on the conditions of the existing tenancy, such as the periodic nature of the tenancy and the terms agreed upon.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy, considering the location and terms of the tenancy, in accordance with the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
Case Reference : CAM/33UG/MNR/2022/0087
P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : 63 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted]
: [NAME].
Date of Application : 3 May 2022
Type of Application : Determination of the market rent under Section 14 Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] and venue of : 14 November 2022 Determination remote hearing on the papers.
_______________________________________________
DECISION ____________________________________
The market rent as at 4 May 2022 is £650 per month.
© CROWN COPYRIGHT S E C FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
This has been a remote hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined on the papers following an inspection. The documents that the Tribunal were referred to are in a bundle, the contents of which have been noted. The order made is described below.
Background
1. On 3 May 2022, the tenant referred to the Tribunal a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
2. The landlord's notice, which was dated 28 March 2022 proposed a rent of £725 per month with effect from 4 May 2022 in place of the existing rent of £595 per month.
3. The tenant occupies under an assured periodic tenancy which commenced on the expiry of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy for 12 months from 4 May 2019. 4. Directions were issued by the tribunal on 28 September 2022.
5. Prior to the hearing the landlord’s agent sent to the tribunal written representations, no written representations were received by or on behalf of the tenant. The Evidence 6. The property is a split-level apartment with its own entrance. The accommodation comprises a living room, bedroom, study/second small bedroom, kitchen and bathroom/wc. It is double glazed and centrally heated, the carpets, curtains and white goods were supplied by the landlord.
7. The agent produced a list of two bedroom flats within a quarter of a mile of the subject premises at rents of £750 to £900 per month; the majority being between £725 and £750 per month. The list also included several one bedroom flats, one at £700 per month had a garden and separate dining room, the remaining two, at asking rents £780 or £795 per month, appeared to be in a purpose built block in grounds.
The law
8. In accordance with the terms of section 14 Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
3 9. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(1), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act.
Valuation
10. In coming to its decision, the Tribunal had regard to the evidence supplied by the landlord. The tenancy agreement limits the occupation to the tenant only. The second bedroom is effectively a second living room or study. Taking into account its location and the terms of the tenancy the tribunal values the flat at £650 per month.
The decision
11. The Tribunal determines the open market rental value of the subject property is £650 per month effective from 4 May 2022 in accordance with the effective date on the landlord’s notice.
Chairman: [NAME]: 14 November 2022
__________________________________
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
i. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
ii. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
iii. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.
iv. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
Appendix Housing Act 1988
4 14 Determination of rent by rent assessment committee. (1)Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d )in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3)For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and
5 (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. (4)In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements…. (7)Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal … shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.
6
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CAM/33UG/MNR/2022/0087
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 63 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Mrs [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME] 2-4 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 650 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 4 May 2022
*3. The amount included for services is n/a Per
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 4 May 2019
5. Length of the term or rental period monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs S11 applies
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord -
8. Description of premises First floor flat in converted semi-detached house comprising three rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc.
[NAME] of Decision 14 November 2022
7
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Room in Multiple Occupation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Assured Tenancy Rent at £450 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent Under Housing Act 1988
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £800
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,000 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £700
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant requests a market rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.
- The determination considers the actual condition and amenities of the property.
- The determination takes into account the location of the property.
- The determination excludes improvements made by the tenant.
- The determination is based on comparable properties in the area.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The case outcome is marked as "?", indicating an unclear or pending decision.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy was set at £650 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in a dispute over the market rent of a property.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, considering the property's location and terms of the tenancy.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the location and terms of the tenancy.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting the rent lower than the landlord proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the location and terms of their tenancy when disputing market rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence such as comparable rental prices and the terms of the tenancy agreement were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving market rent determination.
