VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal assessed the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £935 per calendar month, effective from May 1st, 2023.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy assessmentrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they pay under their assured tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous tribunal decision or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. The tribunal will then decide the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar property under a periodic tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal assessed the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the rent at £935 per calendar month, excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts specified in the judgment.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00DA/MNR/2023/0112

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and

Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies

(Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were

22 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Judge [NAME]

Landlord Mrs [RESPONDENT] c/o [RESPONDENT] 24 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] & Mrs [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 935.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 May 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable 0.00 Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 December 2015

5. Length of the term or rental period 6 months

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

Dining room table and chairs

8. Description of premises

First floor 2-bedroom flat with en-suite bathroom and separate shower and WC in landscaped grounds with designated covered parking space. Situated in popular village close to amenities

Chairman Mrs Katherine Southby Date of Decision 21 August 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the monthly rent to be £935.00.
  • The decision on rent assessment took effect from May 1, 2023.
  • The landlord is responsible for repairs to the property.
  • The property is a two-bedroom flat with an en-suite bathroom and a separate shower and WC.
  • The property includes a designated covered parking space.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which provides the framework for assessing rents.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure they understand how the Housing Act 1988 applies to their tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as the tenancy agreement and relevant financial records were likely considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.