VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal set the rent for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy. The rent was fixed at £202.50 per week, excluding some costs like water rates and council tax.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then decide on the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The decision takes into account the terms of the existing tenancy and any notices given under Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the weekly rent at £202.50 excluding certain costs.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00OU/MNR/2021/0075

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 14 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Judge D [NAME] S [NAME]

Landlord SHP Address 245 Gray’s [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 202.50 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 5th April 2021

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable £60.3 Per week

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 18/01/2016

6. Length of the term or rental period monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs s.11

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none

9. Description of premises Top floor flat with services comprising 1 living room, 1 bedroom, kitchen and bathroom

[NAME] Judge D [NAME] of Decision 26th July 2021

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £202.50 per week.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which sets the criteria for determining rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be determined according to the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence and documents related to the tenancy agreement and the relevant statutory provisions mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.