VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting the monthly rent at £480. This decision applies the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent for tenants in such arrangements.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a determination of rent under an assured periodic tenancy according to the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy, except if the rent is based on a previous determination or more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. The tribunal will then decide the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the monthly rent at £480 excluding certain taxes and including specified services.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. BIR/00CQ/MNR/2018/0065

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 210 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

Landlord Ms. [RESPONDENT]. [RESPONDENT]. [RESPONDENT] 5/6 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £480.00 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 03 February 2019

3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per N/A

4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 03 October 2006

6. Length of the term or rental period 6 months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord & Tenant Act

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Carpets, Curtains, Cooker and Fridge Freezer

9. Description of premises Mid terraced house comprising lounge, dining room, kitchen, lobby and bathroom. Small landing and two double bedrooms. Gas central heating and UPVC double glazing. Front forecourt, small rear garden.

[NAME] of Decision 26 February 2019

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant requests a determination of rent under an assured periodic tenancy as per the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • There are no factors identified that went against the claimant in the provided similar cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £480.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent determination.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which provides the framework for determining rent in assured periodic tenancies.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the application of the Housing Act 1988 to set the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting the rent as requested.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence related to the tenancy agreement and applicable law were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court if there are grounds for appeal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to consult a solicitor for legal advice on cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.