VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £600, starting from 16 October 2023. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a determination of the rent under an assured periodic tenancy according to the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision set the rent at £600 per calendar month, effective from 16 October 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00CF/MNR/2023/0395

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 40 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mrs [RESPONDENT] Mrs [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] C/O [APPELLANT] 4 Hollowstone, Nottingham, [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] & Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 600.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 16 October 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable 0.00 Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 16th February 2021

5. Length of the term or rental period Per Calendar Month – Initially 6 Month Tenancy

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord All floor coverings

8. Description of premises 2 Bedroomed terraced property with living room, kitchen and bathroom. There is a yard to the rear of the property which is situated in a densely populated area and there are railway lines at the rear.

[NAME] of Decision 5th February 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a determination of rent under the Housing Act 1988.
  • The case involves an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The request for rent determination is in accordance with the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant seeks a legal determination of the rent as per their rights.
  • The court recognizes the tenant's right to have the rent determined.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting it at £600 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, determining the rent amount and effective date.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument focused on the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as tenancy agreements and relevant legislation were likely considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get a solicitor for cases involving rent determinations.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.