VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set at £506.25

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £506.25, excluding some charges like water rates and council tax.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination under an assured periodic tenancy according to the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy, except if the rent is based on a previous determination or more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. The tribunal will then decide the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, setting the monthly rent at £506.25 excluding certain charges.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.

JM/LON/00AP/MNR/2023/0049

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and

Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies

(Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were

[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

[RESPONDENT]

Landlord

[APPELLANT]

479 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

[NAME]

1. The rent is: £

506.25

Per

Calendar Month

(excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is:

27 June 2023

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

None

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced

12 November 1998

6. Length of the term or rental period

Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs

Section 11

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

None

9. Description of premises

A one bedroomed flat situated above a retail parade fronting [ADDRESS]. The access is through a shared staircase and common areas shared by 5 flats. The property comprise Living room/ kitchen/diner, shower room with WC and bedroom

[NAME] of Decision

27 June 2023

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed12 cases

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the rent for the property to be £506.25 per calendar month.
  • The decision on the rent determination takes effect from 27 June 2023.
  • The tenancy is an assured periodic tenancy that commenced on 12 November 1998.
  • The property is a one-bedroom flat with shared access and common areas.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which sets out how rents should be determined.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as the tenancy agreement and relevant financial records were likely considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.