VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set at £985

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the monthly rent at £985, starting from November 2020. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar periodic tenancy in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The rent was set at £985 per calendar month, effective from November 2020.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00BN/MNR/2020/0056

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 25 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 146 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 985.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 November 2020

3. The amount included for services is/is

Not applicable Per

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 June 2013

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Carpets, white goods

8. Description of premises 3 bedroom semi detached house with: ground floor: hallway, 2 reception rooms, kitchen. First floor: 2 double bedrooms, 1 single room, bathroom including w/c, wash hand basin, bath and separate shower cubicle. Front and rear gardens. Shared driveway, om street parking.

[NAME] of Decision 2 July 2021

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed11 cases
Other1 case

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined the new rent to be £985.00 per calendar month.
  • The new rent decision takes effect from November 1, 2020.
  • The rent determination excludes water rates and council tax.
  • The landlord provides carpets and white goods as part of the tenancy.
  • The property is a 3-bedroom semi-detached house with specific room layouts and gardens.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £985, effective from November 2020.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the rent determination process.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, ensuring a fair rent determination.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

Ensuring a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988 was the central argument.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a fair rent.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should seek a fair rent determination under the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Details of the tenancy agreement and the description of the premises were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get a solicitor for such cases to ensure proper representation.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.