Rent Determination for Assured Shorthold Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy, setting it at £1,350 per month. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent determined according to the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 22 allows a tenant under an assured shorthold tenancy to apply to an appropriate tribunal for a determination of rent if the rent is considered excessively high compared to similar properties in the area. The tribunal will consider whether there are enough comparable properties and if the rent is significantly higher than what could reasonably be expected.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy and outlined the responsibilities of both the landlord and tenant.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal set the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy at £1,350 per month, effective from January 20th, 2023, following the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR24 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00BK/MDR/2023/0007
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Shorthold Tenancies (Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 22
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 302C [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT] 290 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1,350 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 20th January 2023
3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per
4. Date assured shorthold tenancy commenced 5th August 2022
5. Length of the term or rental period 12 Months
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord – Section 11 applies
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Storage unit, ironing board, white goods, kitchen equipment, dining chairs and table, coffee table, wardrobe, chest of drawers, bed frame and mattress topper.
8. Description of premises 1 bed flat on 3rd floor of brick built, period building with retail unit at ground level (used as estate agents’).
[NAME] of Decision 13th April 2023
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set at £1400 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to have their rent determined according to the Housing Act 1988.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy at £1,350 per month.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the tenant were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, which provides guidelines for setting rents.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument centered around the application of the Housing Act 1988 for determining the rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should refer to the Housing Act 1988 for guidance on rent determination.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included details about the property and the terms of the tenancy agreement.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.