Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on the rent for a property based on an inspection and written statements from both the tenant and landlord. They concluded that the rent should be £900 per month, starting from 30 July 2019.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on the open market value of the property, considering its condition and comparable properties.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar property. The determination considers the property's condition and comparable properties.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for a property based on an inspection and written representations.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for a property based on an inspection and written representations, concluding that the rent should be £900 per month, effective from 30 July 2019.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HP/MNR/2019/0048
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 52 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord [NAME] 4 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & Mrs [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 900.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 30 July 2019
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 30 October 2015
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly periodic
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises Inner terrace house with living room, kitchen, 2 bedrooms and bathroom/wc. Small gardens front & rear. On a modern estate of similar properties.
[NAME] of Decision 10 September 2019
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HP/MNR/2019/0048 Property : 52 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Type of Application : Decision in relation to Housing Act 1988
Date of Decision : 10 September 2019
Reasons for the decision
Background
1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £960.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £925 per month to take effect from 30 July 2019.
2. On 9 July 2019 the Tribunal received an application from the Tenant under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
3. On 24 July 2019 the Tribunal made Directions requiring the landlord to send a statement to the tenants and to the Tribunal supporting the application for an increase in rent. The Tenants were also required to send a statement to the Landlord and to the Tribunal in support of his objection. The landlord was also asked to indicate whether he wished to be present at the inspection.
4. The Tribunal office informed the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on an inspection of the property and written representations subject to the parties requesting an oral hearing. No oral
2 hearing was requested and the application is therefore determined on the basis of the written representations received and with the benefit of an inspection.
Inspection
5. The Landlord did not reply to the Tribunal’s enquiry regarding his presence at the inspection and the inspection was therefore carried out in the presence of Mrs [NAME] and family members.
6. We found the property to be a modestly sized modern inner terrace house situated on an estate of similar and somewhat larger properties. There was a small grassed front area and the front door lead into the living room with open riser stairs up and a modest fitted kitchen off. A casement door at the rear lead to the small patio garden with timber shed. On the first floor were two small bedrooms and a combined bathroom/WC.
7. We noted the dated and dilapidated kitchen cupboards, the failed double-glazed unit adjoining the casement door, the poor water pressure affecting the use of the hand shower and the dilapidated fencing in the patio area.
The parties’ representations
8. Written representations from the Tenants included letting details of a 2- bedroom house in [ADDRESS] available for £900 pcm and a semi- detached house in [ADDRESS] for £895 pcm together with a reference to the defects referred to above and that the loft has an infestation of mice. They considered that the rent should be £900 pcm.
9. The landlord did not submit written representations.
The law
10. S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice;
3 (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (c) (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (d) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
4
Consideration and valuation
11. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the parties is not relevant to this issue.
12. The tenants have provided letting details of two similar 2-bedroom properties in the general area which from the “Zoopla” details appear broadly comparable. Whilst the subject property suffers from the defects referred to at paragraph 7 above it is not possible to determine how its condition compares with the properties put forward as comparable.
13. The Tribunal finds the guidance provided by the asking rents of the comparables persuasive and considers that the rental value of the subject property is £900 pcm.
14. On the information available to the Tribunal in respect of the comparable properties it is not possible to make any adjustment to reflect the wants of repair referred to and we therefore determine the rent at £900 pcm.
Determination
15. The Tribunal therefore determines that the rent at which the property would be expected to let on the terms of the existing tenancy and in its existing condition is £900.00 per month payable from 30 July 2019 being the date referred to in the Landlord’s notice.
[NAME] (Chairman) [NAME] [NAME] 10 September 2019
PERMISSION TO APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to
5 appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenanc…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Condition…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent for Flooding and Lack of Amenities
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's condition is taken into account when determining rent.
- Recent improvements to the property can lead to a lower rent determination.
- The presence of essential amenities and the property's location (e.g., flood-prone areas) affect the rent determination.
- The terms of the tenancy agreement influence the rent determination.
- Similar properties' market values are considered in the rent determination.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's objection to a rent increase under the Housing Act 1988 alone does not necessarily lead to a favorable rent determination.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the rent for the property at £900 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on an inspection of the property and written statements from both parties.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and comparable rental prices were the most important factors.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting the rent at £900 per month.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should provide detailed information about the property's condition and comparable rental prices.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written statements from both the tenant and landlord, along with an inspection of the property, were crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
