VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a new rent of £392.30 per week for an assured periodic tenancy. The decision was based on the open market value of the property in Shepherds Bush, London, and took effect from 3rd April 2023.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on the open market value of the property.

Topics

tenancyrent determinationhousing act

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar periodic tenancy. The determination takes into account the periods of the existing tenancy and the terms of the tenancy except for the rent amount.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a new rent of £392.30 per week for an assured periodic tenancy based on the open market value of the property in Shepherds Bush, London. The decision took effect from 3rd April 2023.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AN/MNR/2023/0190

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 31B [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 392.30 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 3rd April 2023

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 24th April 2023

6. Length of the term or rental period Weekly periodic

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A converted ground floor flat which forms part of Victorian building, comprising one bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom.

[NAME] of Decision 31ST October 2023

Case Reference

: LON/OOAN/MNR/2023/0190

Property : 31B [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 26th March 2023

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 31st October 2023

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £392.30 per calendar week with effect from 3rd April 2023. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On the 24th February 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £242.34 per week in place of the existing rent of £226.49 per week to take effect from 3rd April 2023.

2. On the 26th March 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the landlord together with a schedule of comparable evidence which estimated an open market rent at £1,800 pcm (£415.38 pcw). There were no written submissions from the tenant.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Shepherds Bush area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be £392.30 per week. From this level of rent we have made no adjustments in relation to condition.

6. The Tribunal determines a rent of £392.30 per calendar month.

Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £392.30 per calendar week.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £392.30 to take effect on the 3rd April 2023. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.

10. The Landlord and Tenant may renew this contract for a term to be fixed and agreed mutually at the time of renewal and may, at that time, vary any terms and conditions contained herein and there will be a 5% cap on the rent increase for an additional 12 months.

Chairman: [NAME]: 31 October 2023

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a rent determination based on the open market value of the property.
  • The property's open market value is considered for rent determination.
  • Previous determinations consistently favor the tenant's entitlement.
  • Courts have repeatedly allowed claims for rent determination based on open market value.
  • The right to a fair rent assessment based on open market value is upheld.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • No significant factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a new rent of £392.30 per week for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the open market value of the property in Shepherds Bush, London.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the open market value of the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might expect their rent to be determined based on current market conditions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from the landlord and a schedule of comparable evidence were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate channels.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.