VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Ground Floor Flat in London

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a ground floor flat in London, considering the property's condition and the improvements made by the tenant. The final rent set was £352.75 per week.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the market value of the property while considering the condition and any improvements made by the tenant.

Topics

rent determinationsection 14 Housing Act 1988

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for the property in the open market, excluding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for a ground floor flat in London, taking into account various factors such as the condition of the property and the improvements made by the tenant.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for a ground floor flat in London, taking into account the property's condition and the improvements made by the tenant, resulting in a weekly rent of £352.75.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AP/MNR/2022/0031

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 46a [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]; [APPELLANT] 42 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 352.75 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 April 2022

3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1990

6. Length of the term or rental period Weekly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs S.11 – Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Cooker and gas hob together with floor coverings in kitchen, hallway, shower room and bedroom.

9. Description of premises A ground floor one bedroom flat in a converted semi-detached house. The property has access to a rear garden.

[NAME] Date of Decision 16th May 2022

1

Case reference : LON/00AP/MNR/2022/0031 Property : 46a [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Respondent : [redacted] : 17 December 2021 Type of application : Determination of the market rent under Section 14 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal member(s) : [NAME] [NAME] Venue : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of decision : 12 July 2022

_______________________________________________

DECISION

____________________________________

The Tribunal determines the rent payable from 10 April 2022 is £352.75 per week.

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2014 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background

1. The tenant referred the Tribunal to a Notice of rent increase served by the landlord under section 13 of The Housing Act 1988. The landlord’s Notice which proposed a rent of £410.00 per week with effect from 18 April 2022 is dated 8 March 2022.

2. The tenancy is a periodic tenancy which commenced in January 1990.

3. The Tribunal received written representation from the tenant and the landlord.

The Property

4. The property is a ground floor flat formed from the conversion of a two- storey house.

5. The ground floor flat comprising a bedroom, kitchen, living room and bathroom/WC. Access is from a pathway along the flank wall.

6. It has all mains services including gas fired central heating.

7. The resident has the use of a rear garden.

The Inspection

8. The Tribunal inspected the premises in conjunction with the applicant.

9. A representative from the Landlord attended the property on the date of inspection but was not permitted access by the tenant.

10. The inspection revealed defective window frames and glazing. Dampness was visible to internal wall surfaces and the property is subject to poor thermal efficiency.

11. The Tribunal is told the flat is let unfurnished. The tribunal are advised all carpets, floor coverings and furniture are provided by the tenant.

Written submissions

12. The Landlord in written submission emphasised the extent of recent work undertaken to adapt the property for disabled use. They also provided comparable transaction rental evidence for similar property situated nearby.

13. The tenant submitted details of the dilapidation at the property.

3

The law

14. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rental which it considers that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

15. The Tribunal must first determine that the tenants notice under section 13(4) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.

16. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires the Tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

17. In so doing the Tribunal, are required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act.

18. A copy of the relevant legislation is at Appendix A.

Valuation

19. The Tribunal has had regard to the comparable transaction rental evidence supplied by the tenant, together with the Tribunal’s own knowledge and experience of rental levels in and around the locality of the property. On this basis, it was their opinion that if the flat were in the same condition and managed to the same standard as those available to let on the open market the rental value would be £415.00 per week.

20. The inspection revealed defective window frames and glazing, poor thermal efficiency and the evidence of dampness in the hallway.

21. The tenant has provided all carpets, curtains, white goods and soft furnishings.

22. After careful consideration the Tribunal determined that a weekly rent of £352.75 is appropriate for this dwelling in present condition. Table 1 below provides details on the deductions made from market rent in this calculation.

4

Table 1: Market Rental Assessment

46 a [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Market rent calculation in accordance with Housing Act 1988 Section 13 Market rent £415.00 per week Amount per week Deduction as % Disregards Carpets , curtains white, goods, soft furnishing £31.13 7.50% Dilapidations Defective window frames and glazing £10.38 2.50% Poor thermal efficiency £10.38 2.50% Dampness in hallway £10.38 2.50% Adjustment total £62.25 15.00% Adjusted Market Rent £352.75 per week

Decision

23. The Tribunal first determined that the tenant’s notice under section 13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was served in time.

24. In coming to its decision on the rent the Tribunal applied the relevant law appended at Appendix A.

25. The decision of this Tribunal is based upon the evidence provided in the written submissions and gathered from the inspection.

26. The Tribunal disregarded the benefit of tenants’ improvements or household effects supplied with landlord’s consent in assessment of the Market Rent in accordance with the provisions of the Housing Act.

27. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the rent at which this property in present condition, with disregarded tenants’ improvements and subject to an assured periodic tenancy might reasonably be expected to achieve on the open market is £352.75 per week.

28. This rent will take effect from 18 April 2022.

Valuer Chairman: [NAME]: 12 July 2022

5

Appendix A Housing Act 1988

14 Determination of rent by rent assessment committee.

(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In deciding under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, always during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.

6

(4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant's notice to refer the rent increase to the Tribunal was validly served and satisfied the requirements.
  • The value of carpets, curtains, white goods, and soft furnishings provided by the tenant was deducted from the market rent.
  • The defective window frames and glazing reduced the property's rental value.
  • The property's poor thermal efficiency reduced its rental value.
  • The dampness in the hallway reduced the property's rental value.
  • The Tribunal disregarded the benefit of tenant improvements and household effects when assessing the market rent.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord's argument about recent work for disabled use did not prevent rent deductions for dilapidations.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for a ground floor flat was set at £352.75 per week.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and the improvements made by the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and the improvements made by the tenant were the central arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and any improvements they've made when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition and the improvements made by the tenant were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.