Residents' Association Granted Qualification Under Mobile Homes Act
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal recognised a residents' association under the Mobile Homes Act 1983, giving it the right to consult on matters affecting the mobile home park.
⚖️ Legal holding
A residents' association is a qualifying association if it meets the criteria set out in Paragraph 28(1) of the Mobile Homes Act 1983.
📖 Technical summary
The First-tier Tribunal granted recognition to a residents' association under the Mobile Homes Act 1983.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal granted recognition to a residents' association under the Mobile Homes Act 1983, allowing it to exercise consultation rights.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
:
BIR/31UB/PHK/2024/0001
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted] : [COUNSEL]
Respondent: [redacted] : An Application under paragraph 28 (1) (h) of Chapter 2 of Schedule 1 to the Mobile Homes Act 1983
Tribunal Member : [NAME]
Date of Decision : 17th of April 2024
__________________________________________________________
DECISION _____________________________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Page 2 of 4
BACKGROUND
1. By an application received on 27 February 2024, the Applicant, Castlewood Residents’ [APPELLANT], applied for recognition by the Tribunal as a qualifying residents’ [APPELLANT]. Such recognition confers upon the residents’ [APPELLANT] the consultation rights provided to such associations by Paragraph 22 (f) of the implied terms set out at Chapter 2 of Schedule 1 to the Mobile Homes Act 1983 (as amended).
2. By way of Directions issued on 4 March 2024, the Respondent was invited to advise the Tribunal within 14 days if the application was opposed and on what grounds.
3. On 6 March 2024, the Respondent replied as follows:
I confirm my acknowledgement of [APPELLANT] as a [APPELLANT] in accordance with the current Mobile Homes Act.
The Law
4. Paragraph 28 (1) of the Mobile Homes Act 1983 sets out the requirements to be met by an [APPELLANT].
28(1) A residents’ [APPELLANT] is a qualifying [APPELLANT] in relation to a protected site if –
(a) it is an [APPELLANT] representing the occupiers of mobile homes on that site;
(b) at least 50% of the occupiers of the mobile homes on that site are members of the [APPELLANT];
(c) it is independent from the owner, who together with any agent or employee of his is excluded from membership;
(d) subject to paragraph (c) above, membership is open to all occupiers who own a mobile home on that site;
(e) it maintains a list of members which is open to public inspection together with the rules and constitution of the residents’ [APPELLANT];
(f) it has a chairman, secretary and treasurer who are elected by and from among the members;
Page 3 of 4
(g) with the exception of administrative decisions taken by the chairman, secretary and treasurer acting in their official capacities, decisions are taken by voting and
(h) the owner has acknowledged in writing to the secretary that the [APPELLANT] is a qualifying residents’ [APPELLANT] or, in default if this, the Tribunal has so ordered.
Determination
5. Following a further review of the information supplied, and in the absence of an objection by the Respondent Site Owner, the Tribunal considers that the Applicant has met the requirements of Paragraph 28 (1) of the Mobile Homes Act 1983 and accordingly finds that [APPELLANT] should be afforded qualifying residents’ [APPELLANT] status under the Mobile Homes Act 1983.
Appeal
6. Any appeal against this decision must be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). Prior to making such an appeal an aggrieved party must apply in writing to the First-tier Tribunal for permission to appeal within 28 days of the date specified below stating the grounds on which that party intends to rely in the appeal. Further information is contained within Part 6 of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME]) Rules 2013 (S.I. 2013 No. 1169).
Page 4 of 4
First tier Tribunal ([NAME]) Residential Property CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION An application from [APPELLANT] for a Certificate of Recognition under the provisions of paragraph 28 of Chapter 2 of Schedule 1 to the Mobile Homes Act 1983 has been considered by: [NAME] who is a person appointed under the Act to the panel of persons to act as members of the First Tier Tribunal [NAME] for the Midlands area
This is to certify that [APPELLANT] is a recognised Residents’ [APPELLANT] for the purpose of the aforementioned section. The Certificate will be valid for a period of four years commencing 9 April 2024 [NAME]
9 April 2024
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Recognises Burne Jones House Tenants Association
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Recognises Kingsdown Park Residents Association
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Qualifying Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Residents' Association Granted Qualifying Status Under Mobile Homes Act
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Emergency Sewage Pump Work
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Grants Urgent Lift Repairs Dispensation Without Causing Prejudice
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Grants Dispensation for Urgent Fire Safety Works
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules Property Excluded from Right to Buy for Elderly H…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules Property Excluded from Right to Buy for Elderly S…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Upholds Right-to-Buy Exclusion for Elderly Housing
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Denies Right to Buy for Elderly-Suitable Housing
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Rules Property Excluded from Right to Buy for Elderly H…
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The association meets the specific criteria outlined in the relevant act.
- The landlord's actions do not cause any harm or prejudice to the tenants.
- The works required by the landlord are deemed urgent and necessary for safety.
- The costs and quality of the works requested by the landlord are considered reasonable.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The property is excluded from certain rights due to its suitability for elderly persons.
- The case involves a dwelling-house that was let to a tenant aged 60 or more.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided to grant recognition to a residents' association under the Mobile Homes Act 1983.
Who was involved?
A residents' association and the site owner were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided in favour of the residents' association because it met the statutory requirements.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Mobile Homes Act 1983, specifically Paragraph 28(1), was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was that the association met all the criteria set out in the legislation.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can seek recognition as a qualifying residents' association if they meet the statutory criteria.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence showing the association met the statutory criteria was likely presented.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, an appeal can be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
